| transcript | |
|---|---|
|
00:00 - 0:00:02
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:02 – 0:00:04
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:04 – 0:00:06
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:06 – 0:00:08
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:08 – 0:00:10
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:10 – 0:00:12
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:12 – 0:00:14
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:14 – 0:00:16
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:16 – 0:00:18
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:18 – 0:00:20
[Mobile phone rings]
|
|
|
0:00:20 – 0:00:22
Rectal digital
|
|
|
0:00:22 – 0:00:24
Welcome to Rektal Digital
|
|
|
0:00:24 – 0:00:26
[Music]
|
|
|
0:00:26 – 0:00:28
The Flattermann file
|
|
|
0:00:28 – 0:00:32
It will be wild again in the digital petting zoo of self-righteousness.
|
|
|
0:00:32 – 0:00:37
If you don't criticize one, you're the enemy.
|
|
|
0:00:37 – 0:00:41
But if you criticize the others, you are suddenly completely usable again.
|
|
|
0:00:41 – 0:00:46
So quickly "they're bad" becomes "finally," someone says.
|
|
|
0:00:46 – 0:00:52
And that's where the little parasocial circus number begins, which we take apart today.
|
|
|
0:00:52 – 0:00:57
It's about deleted comments, benevolent words that suddenly disappear,
|
|
|
0:00:57 – 0:01:01
To Jutta completely broken in the breakfast club
|
|
|
0:01:01 – 0:01:04
To create a catalogue of questions that is more after a personal campaign
|
|
|
0:01:04 – 0:01:07
It smells like journalistic enlightenment.
|
|
|
0:01:07 – 0:01:09
And, of course, the big question
|
|
|
0:01:09 – 0:01:13
When does criticism become obsession?
|
|
|
0:01:13 – 0:01:19
And as if that were not enough, today we also open the portal to the parallel world
|
|
|
0:01:19 – 0:01:22
Sascha and Sarah spontaneously go live on TikTok
|
|
|
0:01:22 – 0:01:26
Live and suddenly Frank is sitting in the stream himself.
|
|
|
0:01:26 – 0:01:33
With big small talk, critical questions and a community that doesn't seem to
|
|
|
0:01:33 – 0:01:39
more knew whether to clap, scream or throw the rod out the window.
|
|
|
0:01:39 – 0:01:48
So today a file about double standards, protective reflex, screenshot, fantasies.
|
|
|
0:01:48 – 0:01:54
Private borders, public criticism and people who would like to blow it all out.
|
|
|
0:01:54 – 0:01:58
But please only as long as others are sued for it.
|
|
|
0:01:58 – 0:02:05
So buckle up, polish the aluminium hat and caress the data protection officer.
|
|
|
0:02:05 – 0:02:09
Listen to Rektal Digital now.
|
|
|
0:02:09 – 0:02:12
The Flattermann file.
|
|
|
0:02:17 – 0:02:22
Hello and welcome to Rektal Digital, the file Flattermann.
|
|
|
0:02:22 – 0:02:24
Hello to Sasha!
|
|
|
0:02:24 – 0:02:25
Hello Sarah!
|
|
|
0:02:25 – 0:02:27
How are you?
|
|
|
0:02:27 – 0:02:30
Exceptionally, I'm fine.
|
|
|
0:02:30 – 0:02:32
Yeah, I'm happy about that.
|
|
|
0:02:32 – 0:02:35
How are you?
|
|
|
0:02:35 – 0:02:37
Yeah, all right.
|
|
|
0:02:37 – 0:02:39
It's nice.
|
|
|
0:02:39 – 0:02:45
I thought we'd meet for a little "get in" today.
|
|
|
0:02:45 – 0:02:47
Oh, come on!
|
|
|
0:02:47 – 0:02:52
Yes, for a brief pleasure, but crisp.
|
|
|
0:02:52 – 0:02:54
Oh, you mean something entertaining?
|
|
|
0:02:54 – 0:02:55
Exactly.
|
|
|
0:02:55 – 0:02:57
Hm, sounds good.
|
|
|
0:02:57 – 0:02:59
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:02:59 – 0:03:05
Uh, do we want to make the call to action?
|
|
|
0:03:05 – 0:03:08
Yeah, you can do it.
|
|
|
0:03:08 – 0:03:12
So, if you like what we're doing here,
|
|
|
0:03:12 – 0:03:19
Then give us a like, a thumbs up, a star rating, write a
|
|
|
0:03:19 – 0:03:25
Comment and if you see the whole thing on YouTube, give us your high points.
|
|
|
0:03:25 – 0:03:26
All of them.
|
|
|
0:03:26 – 0:03:27
All of them.
|
|
|
0:03:27 – 0:03:28
Thank you very much.
|
|
|
0:03:28 – 0:03:29
Thank you.
|
|
|
0:03:29 – 0:03:38
Yes, then I would have said, let's get to the house-making and today that's what
|
|
|
0:03:38 – 0:03:46
special, because our housemaking is divided into two parts. You can hear the first part now
|
|
|
0:03:46 – 0:04:01
And the second part at the end. You want to tell that, Lola? Yeah, I'd love to. You know,
|
|
|
0:04:01 – 0:04:10
I love to talk. And a lot. And a lot, yes. I have a long monologue period.
|
|
|
0:04:10 – 0:04:13
Maybe it's because I don't do a lot of podcasts.
|
|
|
0:04:13 – 0:04:15
That could be because of it, yes.
|
|
|
0:04:15 – 0:04:23
Okay, guys. So what we noticed after the last act of the self-actors,
|
|
|
0:04:23 – 0:04:29
is that many of the people who actually don't like us, people like Frank would
|
|
|
0:04:29 – 0:04:37
Now called Hater, suddenly our edition was super great.
|
|
|
0:04:37 – 0:04:39
Yes, also the consequence before.
|
|
|
0:04:39 – 0:04:46
Yeah, and the interesting thing is, they're the same people that Flatterman does on every file.
|
|
|
0:04:46 – 0:04:51
I'm pretty sure you've heard how shitty they are about our format.
|
|
|
0:04:51 – 0:04:57
And how bad and how vulgar and how bad that is with the fart sounds and so on
|
|
|
0:04:57 – 0:04:58
And so on.
|
|
|
0:04:58 – 0:05:15
Suddenly, what we do is super great, because the acts of the self-actors or also the acts of Lautfunk, where we also talked about Impulsiva, were from wording quite similar to the acts of Flatterband and also from the design.
|
|
|
0:05:15 – 0:05:21
Because that's the kind of rectal digital we work on.
|
|
|
0:05:21 – 0:05:26
In fact, I found the dynamics interesting.
|
|
|
0:05:26 – 0:05:32
So when it comes to Frank, the subject is shit, then we're shit.
|
|
|
0:05:32 – 0:05:38
But if we holistically pull all streamers, which means streamers, content creators through the cocoa,
|
|
|
0:05:38 – 0:05:43
in quotation marks, slashes, actually rather edit and thematize,
|
|
|
0:05:43 – 0:05:49
Then we're suddenly good, because with other content creators it's okay to criticize them.
|
|
|
0:05:49 – 0:05:51
Just don't stop at Frank's.
|
|
|
0:05:51 – 0:05:52
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:05:52 – 0:05:53
Interesting.
|
|
|
0:05:53 – 0:06:01
Yes, you can see how well all these dynamics work.
|
|
|
0:06:01 – 0:06:05
Here so pseudosocial and so on and so forth.
|
|
|
0:06:05 – 0:06:07
I mean, we've talked about that enough.
|
|
|
0:06:07 – 0:06:11
Yeah, folks, that's another core example of parasocial relationships.
|
|
|
0:06:11 – 0:06:20
Everything the content creator does that you like, you celebrate. Critics are outlawed for criticism.
|
|
|
0:06:20 – 0:06:29
And hardly critics do not criticize their favorite, but it is only mentioned in the margins, then we are suddenly great.
|
|
|
0:06:29 – 0:06:37
Above all, criticize the people who you already see critically anyway. Then you are celebrated all at once.
|
|
|
0:06:37 – 0:06:39
Interesting dynamics.
|
|
|
0:06:39 – 0:06:43
It's called parasocial relationships.
|
|
|
0:06:43 – 0:06:53
Yes, then it was particularly noticeable, under the last episode Bernie and Boris commented and what should I say?
|
|
|
0:06:53 – 0:06:59
Shortly thereafter, the comments disappeared again, but they were very benevolently written.
|
|
|
0:06:59 – 0:07:07
Yes, I mean Boris Brandt wrote, I think, how great he liked our AI song,
|
|
|
0:07:07 – 0:07:10
That came at the beginning, in the file of the self-actors.
|
|
|
0:07:10 – 0:07:17
Yes, and the Bernie said that we were right with our statement from that,
|
|
|
0:07:17 – 0:07:21
What we said, and he was, I think, wrong, right?
|
|
|
0:07:21 – 0:07:22
Kind of like that.
|
|
|
0:07:22 – 0:07:23
Yeah, sort of, yeah.
|
|
|
0:07:23 – 0:07:28
Yes, and the comments were gone.
|
|
|
0:07:28 – 0:07:33
Yes, yes. That's funny, isn't it? Yeah, but I don't think he said,
|
|
|
0:07:33 – 0:07:38
that he behaved wrongly. This was memory record and is wrong,
|
|
|
0:07:38 – 0:07:44
Because I think that's what we'd rather have heard. I think
|
|
|
0:07:44 – 0:07:49
He just said we were right about what we were saying.
|
|
|
0:07:49 – 0:07:57
Yeah, I think he said that, yeah. Yes, memory record, yes. And then put
|
|
|
0:07:57 – 0:08:03
The question is a) what we do not believe, this man would be suddenly
|
|
|
0:08:03 – 0:08:10
It is self-reflective and could accept criticism, especially if it is justified.
|
|
|
0:08:10 – 0:08:18
But that doesn't seem to be the case, because otherwise he wouldn't have the comment.
|
|
|
0:08:18 – 0:08:19
deleted.
|
|
|
0:08:19 – 0:08:23
Yes, especially as it has been criticized in its behavior towards us.
|
|
|
0:08:23 – 0:08:30
And then he almost, after he had renounced Frank,
|
|
|
0:08:30 – 0:08:39
I apologized to Impulsiva and also installed it there.
|
|
|
0:08:39 – 0:08:41
He would have quarreled with us.
|
|
|
0:08:41 – 0:08:47
And then he comments now under the last issue and then he deletes it again.
|
|
|
0:08:47 – 0:08:52
Yes, and again, he has us, he has quarreled with us.
|
|
|
0:08:52 – 0:09:06
Yes, in any case, the topic came up in a night talk and then he completely let go of how bad we are and we only build on Hate and we would look everywhere only for the bad.
|
|
|
0:09:06 – 0:09:09
So the usual wording again.
|
|
|
0:09:09 – 0:09:16
A typical Bernie. But it was embarrassing, because that would suggest point 2,
|
|
|
0:09:16 – 0:09:22
What I wanted to do if it wasn't self-reflection. Then it's just,
|
|
|
0:09:22 – 0:09:27
He says he found something cool because he probably thought it was against Frank.
|
|
|
0:09:27 – 0:09:34
Or maybe we didn't know in context exactly what we had to criticize.
|
|
|
0:09:34 – 0:09:38
Sometimes the fingers are faster than the mind.
|
|
|
0:09:38 – 0:09:40
Or he didn't listen to it.
|
|
|
0:09:40 – 0:09:44
Exactly and is then probably from others, I guess much more likely,
|
|
|
0:09:44 – 0:09:49
have been pointed out, tell me, how can you comment on such a thing,
|
|
|
0:09:49 – 0:09:51
If they drag you through the cacao like that.
|
|
|
0:09:51 – 0:09:55
First of all, there were also 20 or 22 subcomments.
|
|
|
0:09:55 – 0:10:04
Yes, he also got rid of his fat, you have to say that in the comments.
|
|
|
0:10:04 – 0:10:10
I look forward to Part 2. Me too.
|
|
|
0:10:10 – 0:10:19
Yes, then we come to the next block and that's of course, I don't know,
|
|
|
0:10:19 – 0:10:26
What do you call that, Yuta completely broken apart from edge and band? In Rage?
|
|
|
0:10:26 – 0:10:31
Yes, it would be funny, except the edge and band I found, but somehow more funny reminds me
|
|
|
0:10:31 – 0:10:40
We are now at the breakfast club on the 6th of May in the year of the Lord 2026.
|
|
|
0:10:40 – 0:10:43
Aren't you referring to the Breakfast Dead Club?
|
|
|
0:10:43 – 0:10:49
Yeah, the Breakfast Dead Club, uh, Breakfast Dead Sunday Club.
|
|
|
0:10:49 – 0:10:50
Oh, yeah, yeah, okay.
|
|
|
0:10:50 – 0:10:54
And we've been like that for the last 20 minutes or so.
|
|
|
0:10:54 – 0:11:03
And there's just such an illustrious telephone situation and at some point a Sarah calls.
|
|
|
0:11:03 – 0:11:05
Not me, folks!
|
|
|
0:11:05 – 0:11:17
No, no, no. A spectator named Sarah. And she criticizes the statements of the Raffaela
|
|
|
0:11:17 – 0:11:28
Frank had made a stop in the subject with the Fabian. Because Raffaela is
|
|
|
0:11:28 – 0:11:32
on TikTok with all the livestreams, which in his opinion was very much in the foreground
|
|
|
0:11:32 – 0:11:42
She was, and still is, the mother's mouthpiece, yes, she criticizes that. And Frank could
|
|
|
0:11:42 – 0:11:52
He took up the criticism and addressed it in a calm way.
|
|
|
0:11:52 – 0:12:01
But only to the extent that he allows the other opinion, but not the criticism as such.
|
|
|
0:12:01 – 0:12:07
Yeah, that means he gave her her opinion, but he's not factual,
|
|
|
0:12:07 – 0:12:14
In terms of content, it is better to deal with the criticism, because it has not
|
|
|
0:12:14 – 0:12:19
expressed in this regard. He just said he disagreed. Freedom of speech and so on.
|
|
|
0:12:19 – 0:12:28
bla bla. And at some point Jutta actually fell into the words of Frank and
|
|
|
0:12:28 – 0:12:37
It really took a lot of gas and went steep. And there I have to say, oi oi oi oi,
|
|
|
0:12:37 – 0:12:42
Not only can the woman always be right about Franke, she can also be quite malicious.
|
|
|
0:12:42 – 0:12:51
will be. Yes, you have to say, the voice rose, it became louder. You have such a
|
|
|
0:12:51 – 0:12:57
Aggressive undertone felt in the voice. You've noticed it crackles with her now
|
|
|
0:12:57 – 0:13:07
Huge. Don't forget, it's about your good friend Frank. Yes, man,
|
|
|
0:13:07 – 0:13:18
Frank, man. Such a lovely boab. Yeah, definitely. I thought it was amazing,
|
|
|
0:13:18 – 0:13:25
That she actually got the word. I mean otherwise, I think Frank could go to her
|
|
|
0:13:25 – 0:13:33
Going home and pooping on her head, and she'd even like that.
|
|
|
0:13:33 – 0:13:39
Yes, Frank would find some banal reason why that was right now to turn her upside down.
|
|
|
0:13:39 – 0:13:44
Koten and she would accept it that way. She would celebrate him for it.
|
|
|
0:13:44 – 0:13:50
Yes, and how we listened to that today,
|
|
|
0:13:50 – 0:13:57
Did you say that? You feel like she's not doing him any good.
|
|
|
0:13:57 – 0:14:04
No, actually. I mean, we're some of Frank's biggest critics,
|
|
|
0:14:04 – 0:14:06
When it comes to airtime, content.
|
|
|
0:14:06 – 0:14:11
Yes, you know, at least seven hours, if not eleven hours of podcasting.
|
|
|
0:14:11 – 0:14:19
According to Frank. I don't think the channel is that way.
|
|
|
0:14:19 – 0:14:26
It's very interesting in terms of content, which is actually Frank's fault. In the name of that,
|
|
|
0:14:26 – 0:14:31
How he sells himself and how he treats other people. Although he is also
|
|
|
0:14:31 – 0:14:38
I have to admit that he is very strong in the field of interviews. Yeah, except he stops at Mike's.
|
|
|
0:14:38 – 0:14:45
C's interview kicked in. But we had already discussed this in one of the earlier
|
|
|
0:14:45 – 0:14:49
expenditure. But otherwise, I have to say that he can do interviews.
|
|
|
0:14:49 – 0:14:55
He has a talent for conversation. You have to let him do that. Only that,
|
|
|
0:14:55 – 0:14:59
What we do with it is the problem with it.
|
|
|
0:14:59 – 0:15:02
It's heavy on clickbait.
|
|
|
0:15:02 – 0:15:05
Yeah, and heavy on beef.
|
|
|
0:15:05 – 0:15:09
The more controversial, the more interesting.
|
|
|
0:15:09 – 0:15:20
Yes, unfortunately. But you have to say, if Frank is already controversial as a person and the channel,
|
|
|
0:15:20 – 0:15:29
I think Jutta is again a small but fine cherry on this ice cream cup.
|
|
|
0:15:29 – 0:15:33
You mean that shitty cup.
|
|
|
0:15:33 – 0:15:42
Yeah, or something, that's what you said. Yeah, she's just making it worse. So,
|
|
|
0:15:42 – 0:15:49
no front. I mean, you can usually say your opinion, so should you.
|
|
|
0:15:49 – 0:15:56
to be admitted. But the way you sell yourself and get to the streamer
|
|
|
0:15:56 – 0:16:07
To bend over and lick his feet by agreeing with everything he says,
|
|
|
0:16:07 – 0:16:13
Yes, and fumigate it without end. I find that questionable. The interesting thing is yes,
|
|
|
0:16:13 – 0:16:21
If the two of them go into this discourse, just keep this distribution of roles that way again.
|
|
|
0:16:21 – 0:16:29
Jutta also thinks that she sometimes gives him a tinder and sometimes he
|
|
|
0:16:29 – 0:16:36
contradictory. Unfortunately, that's not the case at all, but she's already talking to him a lot.
|
|
|
0:16:36 – 0:16:44
the mouth and above all this behavior, that you defend the Frank every time
|
|
|
0:16:44 – 0:16:51
must. So if I've learned one thing in dealing with Frank all the time now, since
|
|
|
0:16:51 – 0:16:58
When we talk about Frank, he knows how to defend himself. Subtle or even
|
|
|
0:16:58 – 0:17:06
Hold on to the crowbar. So figuratively speaking. So starting from small tips in live situations
|
|
|
0:17:06 – 0:17:12
or in videos up to fat letters from the lawyer.
|
|
|
0:17:12 – 0:17:16
Yeah, so he's very capable of defending himself.
|
|
|
0:17:16 – 0:17:19
I mean, he doesn't need jutta.
|
|
|
0:17:19 – 0:17:23
No, he's also good at distributing spikes on his own.
|
|
|
0:17:23 – 0:17:26
I mean, if you look at the Instagram statuses
|
|
|
0:17:26 – 0:17:30
Look at the last few months, you know.
|
|
|
0:17:30 – 0:17:33
There's a lot of tinder behind it.
|
|
|
0:17:33 – 0:17:33
Oh, yeah.
|
|
|
0:17:33 – 0:17:40
And he can do it very well on his own. What Jutta is doing is in my eyes.
|
|
|
0:17:40 – 0:17:49
Just embarrassing, because it kind of looks like she's the mom and Frank's the little one.
|
|
|
0:17:49 – 0:17:57
Child you have to face. There is also the question, I want as a streamer, as a content
|
|
|
0:17:57 – 0:18:02
I work on my channel in such a way that I need others to stand up for me.
|
|
|
0:18:02 – 0:18:08
And then there's always the question of how she does it.
|
|
|
0:18:08 – 0:18:19
And the Breakfast Dead Club, Sunday Dead Club, that was something very special.
|
|
|
0:18:19 – 0:18:24
It was nice to see her going to the ceiling, especially when she was talking to this
|
|
|
0:18:24 – 0:18:30
The viewer is actually talking to Frank, she is constantly interfering,
|
|
|
0:18:30 – 0:18:37
He keeps coming up and wants to talk all the time,
|
|
|
0:18:37 – 0:18:42
Frank has very little say in the situation.
|
|
|
0:18:42 – 0:18:48
So even the viewer said I'm talking to Frank, not you.
|
|
|
0:18:48 – 0:18:56
It was content gold.
|
|
|
0:18:56 – 0:19:04
Yeah, definitely. That was special. I was jutter completely broken. Maybe
|
|
|
0:19:04 – 0:19:09
You should have your own YouTube channel. On the other hand, you really have to
|
|
|
0:19:09 – 0:19:16
Seriously critical questions. Frank, have fun. Do you really want such a
|
|
|
0:19:16 – 0:19:25
Breakfast club lead in the morning with a moderator who goes like this and actually
|
|
|
0:19:25 – 0:19:32
I want to take the format a bit too. I mean, she already has one.
|
|
|
0:19:32 – 0:19:38
A certain presence. That is not a bad thing per se. But then the question is whether they
|
|
|
0:19:38 – 0:19:43
You don't get your own format on your channel, which I do very well.
|
|
|
0:19:43 – 0:19:51
I wonder if I'm going to do this or if she's really doing something of her own.
|
|
|
0:19:51 – 0:19:52
on their own channel.
|
|
|
0:19:52 – 0:19:55
For me personally, it would be nothing.
|
|
|
0:19:55 – 0:19:59
It has happened from time to time that people with whom Frank worked
|
|
|
0:19:59 – 0:20:02
Suddenly I made my own channel.
|
|
|
0:20:02 – 0:20:04
That's one time or another.
|
|
|
0:20:04 – 0:20:10
Yes, it has also happened that one or the other, who once worked with Frank
|
|
|
0:20:10 – 0:20:12
He has distanced himself.
|
|
|
0:20:12 – 0:20:15
Or that he distanced himself.
|
|
|
0:20:15 – 0:20:19
Yeah, but we'll get back to that later.
|
|
|
0:20:19 – 0:20:21
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:20:21 – 0:20:26
Oh, we're going to do the next blog and it's so funny.
|
|
|
0:20:26 – 0:20:27
Mm-hmm.
|
|
|
0:20:27 – 0:20:30
Not really, either, no.
|
|
|
0:20:30 – 0:20:35
What do we call this blog?
|
|
|
0:20:35 – 0:20:40
Hm, good question.
|
|
|
0:20:40 – 0:20:47
Our topic is "New journalist Impulsiva asks questions".
|
|
|
0:20:47 – 0:20:50
Why a "new journalist"?
|
|
|
0:20:50 – 0:20:57
Ah, folks, you have to cut that out now, even if it actually has nothing to do with the Flattermann file.
|
|
|
0:20:57 – 0:21:04
Our Impulsiva Primitiva thought it would be an insanely horny idea,
|
|
|
0:21:04 – 0:21:09
Apply for a press card or get one.
|
|
|
0:21:09 – 0:21:11
Yeah, what am I supposed to say about that?
|
|
|
0:21:11 – 0:21:15
It's not that easy.
|
|
|
0:21:15 – 0:21:17
Unless you take this funny page on the internet
|
|
|
0:21:17 – 0:21:19
You pay $45 and then you get one.
|
|
|
0:21:19 – 0:21:21
But he is also
|
|
|
0:21:21 – 0:21:23
somehow worth nothing.
|
|
|
0:21:23 – 0:21:25
Yes, with this
|
|
|
0:21:25 – 0:21:27
You can get a press card
|
|
|
0:21:27 – 0:21:29
Nowhere to legitimize
|
|
|
0:21:29 – 0:21:31
Nor does it get any information anywhere.
|
|
|
0:21:31 – 0:21:33
No authority, no
|
|
|
0:21:33 – 0:21:35
Police and None
|
|
|
0:21:35 – 0:21:37
public sector bodies which:
|
|
|
0:21:37 – 0:21:39
I know or have a press office.
|
|
|
0:21:39 – 0:21:45
Yes, and with others you have to bring so certain evidence that you have publications,
|
|
|
0:21:45 – 0:21:53
So that you have to live on one bandage, so you have to live on your own.
|
|
|
0:21:53 – 0:21:58
journalistic activity. But there is also some kind of association, where you can also
|
|
|
0:21:58 – 0:22:05
You can be a part-time journalist. But somehow you have to prove with everyone,
|
|
|
0:22:05 – 0:22:07
They worked journalistically.
|
|
|
0:22:07 – 0:22:10
You have to have publications in the past.
|
|
|
0:22:10 – 0:22:15
And publications only mean YouTube videos?
|
|
|
0:22:15 – 0:22:22
You could make journalistic formats,
|
|
|
0:22:22 – 0:22:26
Documentation or something like that.
|
|
|
0:22:26 – 0:22:29
But opinion blogging, that's difficult.
|
|
|
0:22:29 – 0:22:37
Yes, because opinion blogging virtually undermines journalistic work. That's the opposite of that.
|
|
|
0:22:37 – 0:22:44
Yes, I meant that this has to be marked completely as a comment or something. I mean,
|
|
|
0:22:44 – 0:22:49
there is a commentary as a journalistic means and then the opinion of the
|
|
|
0:22:49 – 0:22:53
Journalists are reported. But you have to mark that specifically and bla bla,
|
|
|
0:22:53 – 0:22:58
You haven't seen it. So it is difficult to be a journalistic opinion blogger.
|
|
|
0:22:58 – 0:23:07
Especially if, as in the case of Impulsiva Primitiva, you actually built up your reach only through beef.
|
|
|
0:23:07 – 0:23:15
Especially against Frank Battermann.
|
|
|
0:23:15 – 0:23:20
Yes or by just guessing it stopped at trash TV formats.
|
|
|
0:23:20 – 0:23:27
You know that he was marked by the InTouch as an expert in this area.
|
|
|
0:23:27 – 0:23:31
As an expert in denunciation?
|
|
|
0:23:31 – 0:23:33
That's what you said now.
|
|
|
0:23:33 – 0:23:35
Well, that's fine.
|
|
|
0:23:35 – 0:23:38
No, but now it was fun aside.
|
|
|
0:23:38 – 0:23:45
Someone who has actually only produced scrap and opinion blogging and also very, very often
|
|
|
0:23:45 – 0:23:53
is above it and is very, very loud and impulsive and also uses many swear words and,
|
|
|
0:23:53 – 0:23:59
And, let's say, not really, yeah, what do you call that,
|
|
|
0:23:59 – 0:24:05
Not really benevolent and …
|
|
|
0:24:05 – 0:24:08
Yeah, it's hard.
|
|
|
0:24:08 – 0:24:16
Yes, no, but expresses not only benevolently, but also unresearched,
|
|
|
0:24:16 – 0:24:22
Because journalism is primarily about research.
|
|
|
0:24:22 – 0:24:31
And then I have to work with taking information that I can prove and verify.
|
|
|
0:24:31 – 0:24:37
Where I also bring evidence, where I work with sources that I bring in.
|
|
|
0:24:37 – 0:24:43
These are all things I've never seen with her.
|
|
|
0:24:43 – 0:24:51
As I said, because it only strikes through very impulsive, primitive behavior,
|
|
|
0:24:51 – 0:25:00
where she almost pulls over Frank Buttermann and has actually only stuck to one topic.
|
|
|
0:25:00 – 0:25:05
It's not just when you look at Instagram stories.
|
|
|
0:25:05 – 0:25:17
if she then considers misconduct by any Z-to-double Z-promises,
|
|
|
0:25:17 – 0:25:25
So much criticism and so much opinion is being posted.
|
|
|
0:25:25 – 0:25:29
We can't talk about journalism at all.
|
|
|
0:25:29 – 0:25:33
We are not a journalistic format.
|
|
|
0:25:33 – 0:25:40
That's opinion blogging, too, and that's perfectly okay.
|
|
|
0:25:40 – 0:25:51
But I mean, some people also think that there is the moral authority and the journalistic medium par excellence.
|
|
|
0:25:51 – 0:25:55
Now that's just my humble opinion.
|
|
|
0:25:55 – 0:26:01
Yes, the megalomania is ticking. It's mentioned in a magazine called InTouch.
|
|
|
0:26:01 – 0:26:06
You're the star of tomorrow, aren't you? And the star journalist.
|
|
|
0:26:06 – 0:26:13
So, I'm already imagining, tomorrow Impulsiva Primitiva will be the biggest influencer in the whole world.
|
|
|
0:26:13 – 0:26:14
Definitely.
|
|
|
0:26:14 – 0:26:15
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:26:15 – 0:26:18
Oh, the world.
|
|
|
0:26:18 – 0:26:22
The solar system is not enough either. This is universe.
|
|
|
0:26:22 – 0:26:24
Yeah, man.
|
|
|
0:26:24 – 0:26:26
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:26:26 – 0:26:29
In any case, she has seen an effort,
|
|
|
0:26:29 – 0:26:33
Send a list of questions to Frank.
|
|
|
0:26:33 – 0:26:36
Because Frank had in the video,
|
|
|
0:26:36 – 0:26:40
where he was about the visit he had received,
|
|
|
0:26:40 – 0:26:44
What was the day of work, huh?
|
|
|
0:26:44 – 0:26:47
Yes, I believe on the first of May, yes.
|
|
|
0:26:47 – 0:26:50
He probably got a visit there, after his signposting.
|
|
|
0:26:50 – 0:26:58
And then he said, if you have questions to me, then you can send me an e-mail or even
|
|
|
0:26:58 – 0:27:05
Call me, if necessary, and you can sort it out. And then there was this
|
|
|
0:27:05 – 0:27:14
Question catalogue, which was four pages long and I have to say hat off,
|
|
|
0:27:14 – 0:27:20
Because a few weeks ago they had made fun of the fact that Thal News,
|
|
|
0:27:20 – 0:27:29
what had these been, 14 pages with pictures and so on, a catalogue of questions finished
|
|
|
0:27:29 – 0:27:38
Yes, and yes, it made fun of me. And now you make one yourself
|
|
|
0:27:38 – 0:27:43
Catalogue of questions.
|
|
|
0:27:43 – 0:27:45
Yes, what I wanted to go into again, for
|
|
|
0:27:45 – 0:27:48
The people who did not know,
|
|
|
0:27:48 – 0:27:51
What I can't imagine, to
|
|
|
0:27:51 – 0:27:55
Subject of visit. This was a visit to the
|
|
|
0:27:55 – 0:27:59
Private property of Frank B. came
|
|
|
0:27:59 – 0:28:01
on 1 May. According to statements by
|
|
|
0:28:01 – 0:28:03
Frank, it's supposed to be two men.
|
|
|
0:28:03 – 0:28:06
They may have acted on the property.
|
|
|
0:28:03 – 0:28:11
They came when Christine was on the property and other relatives. The memory protocol
|
|
|
0:28:11 – 0:28:19
Now. So don't nail it, please. And these men are said to have asked about Frank,
|
|
|
0:28:19 – 0:28:26
Whether they are right there. I also had an old photo with me. Yes, and then, I think,
|
|
|
0:28:26 – 0:28:31
Christine asked what it was all about. And then they said to the Wollnies and to the
|
|
|
0:28:31 – 0:28:39
I want the boutique. And Christine then asked the two men to leave, which they didn't do at first.
|
|
|
0:28:39 – 0:28:46
They did, but only when it was almost said that now the police are called,
|
|
|
0:28:46 – 0:28:55
They must have reacted, according to hearsay, like "no police" and then the
|
|
|
0:28:55 – 0:28:57
We went back down from the property.
|
|
|
0:28:57 – 0:29:01
Frank had it that day.
|
|
|
0:29:01 – 0:29:05
Had he had a post in his Instagram story,
|
|
|
0:29:05 – 0:29:07
also memory protocol,
|
|
|
0:29:07 – 0:29:10
that there was some sort of police operation,
|
|
|
0:29:10 – 0:29:12
But he hasn't said anything concrete yet,
|
|
|
0:29:12 – 0:29:18
The story was told a day later, on May 2.
|
|
|
0:29:18 – 0:29:22
Yes, and then there was the Sunday livestream
|
|
|
0:29:22 – 0:29:33
The story again and there he says yes that you can just ask him and then Impulsiva created her catalog.
|
|
|
0:29:33 – 0:29:42
Exactly and the interesting thing is again on the spot, Tal News is a journalistic working magazine.
|
|
|
0:29:42 – 0:29:49
In contrast to Impulsiva, i.e. press cards, he also possesses the international one.
|
|
|
0:29:49 – 0:29:53
And by the way, it's not that easy to get.
|
|
|
0:29:53 – 0:29:58
So for this you have to be a real journalist, no matter what you think of part news or
|
|
|
0:29:58 – 0:29:59
It's not.
|
|
|
0:29:59 – 0:30:00
That's a fact.
|
|
|
0:30:00 – 0:30:11
And, of course, he has the right to send questionnaires to press offices or private individuals.
|
|
|
0:30:11 – 0:30:13
If he wants to make a report about it.
|
|
|
0:30:13 – 0:30:17
Of course, some people can laugh at that, that's not an issue.
|
|
|
0:30:17 – 0:30:22
But it is very questionable what Sasha wanted to do,
|
|
|
0:30:22 – 0:30:26
If you criticize Thal News for making a catalogue of questions,
|
|
|
0:30:26 – 0:30:32
to get information, because that's what a journalistic magazine does.
|
|
|
0:30:32 – 0:30:35
Now she does it herself.
|
|
|
0:30:35 – 0:30:46
The funniest thing is actually that she does it in her own form, even though she has been working on Frank for years and pulling him through the dirt.
|
|
|
0:30:46 – 0:30:54
And now you can get in with the questions as to what the matter is.
|
|
|
0:30:55 – 0:31:04
clean, tricky, in sleepless nights developed dramatology for this little feat here,
|
|
|
0:31:04 – 0:31:09
That you didn't just do, I now dedicate myself to the questions.
|
|
|
0:31:09 – 0:31:17
So of the many questions, so there are points 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and then a lot of sub-points,
|
|
|
0:31:17 – 0:31:24
Of course, the AI of my least trust has just picked out the strongest three.
|
|
|
0:31:24 – 0:31:35
And I don't read things like Sabrina or Impulsiva did, but in a shortened form.
|
|
|
0:31:35 – 0:31:48
How do they explain the contradiction between their public presentation that it was nothing and what was later admitted in court?
|
|
|
0:31:48 – 0:31:59
It is about the statement in the court hearing between his sworn oath and his statement.
|
|
|
0:31:59 – 0:32:14
What happens to the donations if the original donation purpose no longer supports the fight against alleged false factual claims after the judicial developments?
|
|
|
0:32:14 – 0:32:24
This refers to the changed fundraising campaign, which stops at Frank's GoFundMe fundraising campaign
|
|
|
0:32:24 – 0:32:25
It happened.
|
|
|
0:32:25 – 0:32:29
Because earlier it was about the many legal disputes, then it was once about the
|
|
|
0:32:29 – 0:32:30
appeal.
|
|
|
0:32:30 – 0:32:35
I don't know what's in it now, I haven't looked at it yet.
|
|
|
0:32:35 – 0:32:39
In any case, there were often substantive changes.
|
|
|
0:32:39 – 0:32:59
And the third strong question is, are they willing to give a clear, complete opinion on their own behavior, without, besides locations, counterattacks or distractions to other cases?
|
|
|
0:32:59 – 0:33:05
And that just refers to what you see on social media again and again,
|
|
|
0:33:05 – 0:33:13
if someone has to defend himself, that he stops side battlefields, straw men and
|
|
|
0:33:13 – 0:33:18
hatred in itself in order to somehow legitimize one's own behavior or
|
|
|
0:33:18 – 0:33:24
to distract or to relativize something.
|
|
|
0:33:24 – 0:33:54
I find it so extremely interesting that when you look at the entire catalogue of questions, it's not about revealing something or getting Frank to admit something, but it's not about enlightenment, it's just about keeping control of the narrative.
|
|
|
0:33:54 – 0:34:00
And that clearly shows. The entire list of questions cries out to the outside world.
|
|
|
0:34:00 – 0:34:13
It is also the case that Impulsiva has enjoyed an uncanny flight of heights since the trial and the verdict, which came later.
|
|
|
0:34:13 – 0:34:23
It's true that Impulsiva really stuck with Frank. By pinned, we really mean pinned.
|
|
|
0:34:23 – 0:34:31
Yes, that is, how can I say, of course, it claims the opposite.
|
|
|
0:34:31 – 0:34:40
Yes, and she would love to do anything else and this and that is a heart theme and bla bla bla.
|
|
|
0:34:40 – 0:34:48
In reality, one notices this total, yes, this is obsessive behavior,
|
|
|
0:34:48 – 0:34:54
This is so focused on him, this "I have to destroy this man".
|
|
|
0:34:54 – 0:34:57
It goes far beyond criticism.
|
|
|
0:34:57 – 0:35:01
That's right. What is happening is pure hatred.
|
|
|
0:35:01 – 0:35:08
And that's what we saw, even in the groups that had Impulsiva.
|
|
|
0:35:08 – 0:35:13
These structures, these people, how they interact.
|
|
|
0:35:13 – 0:35:21
And you can also see it in its entire way when it expresses itself. It is eaten up by hatred.
|
|
|
0:35:21 – 0:35:26
And the thing is, it also has some potential.
|
|
|
0:35:26 – 0:35:33
Many things that people have never understood, for example, she says she stands for child protection,
|
|
|
0:35:33 – 0:35:39
However, he only works with topic XY on Frank.
|
|
|
0:35:39 – 0:35:47
If she is so committed to child protection, why doesn't she actively do something for child protection?
|
|
|
0:35:47 – 0:35:55
Because she still has herself in her own, I don't know if it was livestream or in a video, yet recently voiced,
|
|
|
0:35:55 – 0:35:58
She would do the same with anyone else.
|
|
|
0:35:58 – 0:36:05
Impulsiva, there are so many cases publicly known, including cases that have occurred in recent months and weeks.
|
|
|
0:36:05 – 0:36:09
You only need to check the press reports once.
|
|
|
0:36:09 – 0:36:14
Or even look at social media.
|
|
|
0:36:14 – 0:36:17
At TikTok. There are always enough
|
|
|
0:36:17 – 0:36:20
Issues related to child protection.
|
|
|
0:36:20 – 0:36:26
I've been following you for the last few months,
|
|
|
0:36:26 – 0:36:32
You haven't even seen any content where you are in this regard.
|
|
|
0:36:32 – 0:36:39
about other people as well. Yes, when she uses other people, it's always,
|
|
|
0:36:39 – 0:36:43
To point to Frank. And then we come to such another point, which is also
|
|
|
0:36:43 – 0:36:49
I've noticed where I've seen this livestream, where is this catalogue of questions
|
|
|
0:36:49 – 0:36:57
was read aloud. What was suddenly swarming around? As you can see, they have a
|
|
|
0:36:57 – 0:37:03
a few weeks ago, a few months ago, destruction videos and livestream made,
|
|
|
0:37:03 – 0:37:09
where LaVan was literally disassembled. Then LaVan showed up with Frank Battermann.
|
|
|
0:37:09 – 0:37:17
Then, for whatever reason, Frank ended the collaboration with LaVan and swooped,
|
|
|
0:37:17 – 0:37:22
LaVan was good again. Every time someone has stress with Frank,
|
|
|
0:37:22 – 0:37:26
Is a good friend of an impulsive? Why that?
|
|
|
0:37:26 – 0:37:35
A great example is Cravalenta, i.e. Kalanta Volni. We also have in
|
|
|
0:37:35 – 0:37:41
The last podcast talked about it. There is hardly any difference between Frank and Cravalenta.
|
|
|
0:37:41 – 0:37:46
Discrepancies and the two distance themselves from each other and post the two
|
|
|
0:37:46 – 0:37:54
In public on Instagram, Impulsiva is back. The enemy of my
|
|
|
0:37:54 – 0:38:05
Enemy is my friend and then contact is established immediately. Impulsively, however, the
|
|
|
0:38:05 – 0:38:12
Gravalenta according to Gravalenta's own statements in Frank's interview with Acte Volgni
|
|
|
0:38:12 – 0:38:20
said that Impulsiva supposedly threatened her, I find this dynamic
|
|
|
0:38:20 – 0:38:28
It is interesting that a Cravalenta joins forces with an Impulsiva and the
|
|
|
0:38:28 – 0:38:32
Talk on the phone and then, I don't know, work together against Frank.
|
|
|
0:38:32 – 0:38:40
I mean, there's often nothing else to expect from Cravalenta, because she's also borderline.
|
|
|
0:38:40 – 0:38:47
She is untreated. This is a very important point. This is a typical borderline goal.
|
|
|
0:38:47 – 0:38:53
Injuring Frank so much that she goes to Impulsiva.
|
|
|
0:38:53 – 0:38:57
But from Impulsiva this is again a very interesting dynamic,
|
|
|
0:38:57 – 0:39:08
Because she always shot against Cravalenta, especially in connection with the Ghoul of Goliath, the Giulia.
|
|
|
0:39:08 – 0:39:18
As the biggest Wollny fan, she stands up for the family and would also like to be one of the Wollny children.
|
|
|
0:39:18 – 0:39:22
And by the way, super interesting …
|
|
|
0:39:22 – 0:39:25
Who's escaping?
|
|
|
0:39:25 – 0:39:32
Yes, man, the Ghoul of Ghouliat and Impulsiva are no longer friends, man, they were so …
|
|
|
0:39:32 – 0:39:42
Yeah? Goliath's ghoul was the gum under Impulsiva's sole.
|
|
|
0:39:42 – 0:39:46
Yes, it was even between the sole of the shoe and the foot.
|
|
|
0:39:46 – 0:39:56
Yes, yes. Man, the Ghoul of Goliath would have had the name of Impulsiva tattooed on his forehead.
|
|
|
0:39:56 – 0:40:00
As morbid as she was behind her.
|
|
|
0:40:00 – 0:40:03
And hardly, I guess, I don't know.
|
|
|
0:40:03 – 0:40:06
Yeah, that's thinking now.
|
|
|
0:40:06 – 0:40:09
That's a consideration, it's conjecture.
|
|
|
0:40:09 – 0:40:15
I think Guliad's ghoul didn't like it that much.
|
|
|
0:40:15 – 0:40:20
that Impulsiva suddenly gets along well with Gravalenta,
|
|
|
0:40:20 – 0:40:26
because the Ghul of Guliad, who would also like to be a Wollny child,
|
|
|
0:40:26 – 0:40:36
In recent months, Gravalenta has also shot massively against Gravalenta, because Gravalenta has problems with the Wollny family.
|
|
|
0:40:36 – 0:40:43
And I'd say for the Ghoul of Goliath that was probably highly treasonous,
|
|
|
0:40:43 – 0:40:47
Impulsiva has teamed up with Gravalenta.
|
|
|
0:40:47 – 0:40:54
And I find the dynamics interesting because according to Impulsiva and the Ghoul of Goliath, they were best friends.
|
|
|
0:40:54 – 0:41:02
How can it be that the own narcissism of Impulsiva ensures that
|
|
|
0:41:02 – 0:41:08
Just to get rid of Frank one thing, that he's all right, and that she's going over her girlfriend?
|
|
|
0:41:08 – 0:41:09
She doesn't give a shit.
|
|
|
0:41:09 – 0:41:12
You know the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
|
|
|
0:41:12 – 0:41:13
That's it.
|
|
|
0:41:13 – 0:41:18
Yes, and at all altitudes, the ruble has to roll.
|
|
|
0:41:18 – 0:41:20
That, of course, is.
|
|
|
0:41:20 – 0:41:23
I don't care about my friends either.
|
|
|
0:41:24 – 0:41:33
Yes, but now back to the journalistic noisy woman.
|
|
|
0:41:33 – 0:41:37
Do you think there will be an answer?
|
|
|
0:41:37 – 0:41:46
So as I judge Frank, I'd say, let me think for a moment, no.
|
|
|
0:41:46 – 0:41:51
Yeah, I'd put my hand on the fire, too, so there's nothing coming.
|
|
|
0:41:51 – 0:41:54
Yes, it would surprise me.
|
|
|
0:41:54 – 0:42:02
So that will be so slowly noisy in the digital ether, so "shhh" away, away.
|
|
|
0:42:02 – 0:42:04
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:42:04 – 0:42:14
So I also found this suffisant way of reading the questions interesting.
|
|
|
0:42:14 – 0:42:17
And in the meantime, they found out,
|
|
|
0:42:17 – 0:42:20
After a question-and-answer session,
|
|
|
0:42:20 – 0:42:22
"Write a one in the chat",
|
|
|
0:42:22 – 0:42:25
Ah, how it was,
|
|
|
0:42:25 – 0:42:28
whether you should send this thing in advance
|
|
|
0:42:28 – 0:42:31
Or wait for the livestream.
|
|
|
0:42:31 – 0:42:37
And then at some point like that at a third or half of the time like that
|
|
|
0:42:37 – 0:42:39
Then it came to pass,
|
|
|
0:42:39 – 0:42:42
Jutta should have been packed in CC,
|
|
|
0:42:42 – 0:42:50
It almost gets delivered as well. Then the only question is, in the open CC or in the
|
|
|
0:42:50 – 0:42:59
CC where you don't see that you were the CC. Questions about questions. Yes, questions about questions.
|
|
|
0:42:59 – 0:43:08
Yes, I mean, why would Jutta answer the questions addressed to Frank completely broken
|
|
|
0:43:08 – 0:43:18
I mean well, to a certain point you have to say yes, the Jutta likes to take over the
|
|
|
0:43:18 – 0:43:26
Speaking and responding very gladly. But I think Frank would be big enough,
|
|
|
0:43:26 – 0:43:34
If he wanted to, he would answer it alone. And many of the questions are actually
|
|
|
0:43:34 – 0:43:40
Also comprehensible. But we could turn the tables. We'll send you now
|
|
|
0:43:40 – 0:43:47
Impulsiva an imaginary catalogue of questions with exactly the same questions and ask them to you.
|
|
|
0:43:47 – 0:43:54
Because you haven't even commented on the accusations in the last few weeks,
|
|
|
0:43:54 – 0:44:04
which we have made for you, which are indeed so true. If I am morally so
|
|
|
0:44:04 – 0:44:11
flexible, which is why you have a lot in common, you and the Frank, yes, and also the
|
|
|
0:44:11 – 0:44:18
Double standards live, so I would have to face the criticism myself. But you know,
|
|
|
0:44:18 – 0:44:27
According to Impulsiva, we and Frank are extremely similar. Yeah, totally. We communicate it openly,
|
|
|
0:44:27 – 0:44:33
that we both have Borderline and if you just try a little bit, oh what do I say,
|
|
|
0:44:33 – 0:44:42
nano millimeter, which is familiar with the matter, then you know exactly, Borderliner and Narcissist
|
|
|
0:44:42 – 0:44:51
It cannot be further apart from the behaviors as it could be.
|
|
|
0:44:51 – 0:44:58
But, well, big words said aloud are especially impulsive.
|
|
|
0:44:58 – 0:45:03
Yes, especially if you come from an impulsiva primitiva.
|
|
|
0:45:03 – 0:45:05
and impulses.
|
|
|
0:45:05 – 0:45:15
But seriously, I mean the same questions you ask, Frank, could you
|
|
|
0:45:15 – 0:45:22
Rewords something, adapts it, and puts it in front of you. Because we're really interested in a question
|
|
|
0:45:22 – 0:45:31
Why? Why have you been working on him for years? Where did that start with you?
|
|
|
0:45:31 – 0:45:41
When did criticism become hatred? And when did you start being so dogged? I also wonder,
|
|
|
0:45:41 – 0:45:48
What must have gone wrong in life. Biting so hard doesn't have anything to do with normal
|
|
|
0:45:48 – 0:45:51
YouTube Beef, which is known as Creators.
|
|
|
0:45:51 – 0:45:56
You can see it in the things she broke with us.
|
|
|
0:45:56 – 0:46:05
She is unable to attribute positive qualities to a person like Frank.
|
|
|
0:46:05 – 0:46:07
Only all the negatives.
|
|
|
0:46:07 – 0:46:12
So I'm sure Frank's to blame for the sinking of the Titanic.
|
|
|
0:46:12 – 0:46:17
Frank is at the comet that struck and exterminated the dinosaurs.
|
|
|
0:46:17 – 0:46:27
And Frank will also be to blame for the universe eventually ceasing to exist.
|
|
|
0:46:27 – 0:46:31
It's as safe as the arm in the church.
|
|
|
0:46:31 – 0:46:32
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:46:32 – 0:46:36
And that shows the madness of it.
|
|
|
0:46:36 – 0:46:38
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:46:38 – 0:46:44
And as I said, since we ourselves are critics, because now many say that you speak for yourselves
|
|
|
0:46:44 – 0:46:45
about Frank.
|
|
|
0:46:45 – 0:46:59
Of course, we do, but we mainly focus on the content it makes and work on current issues, if necessary, and question certain moral misconducts.
|
|
|
0:46:59 – 0:47:08
But not so excessive and so destructive. That's not our style, and that's never been our style.
|
|
|
0:47:08 – 0:47:13
That's right. Are we going to make the next block?
|
|
|
0:47:13 – 0:47:15
Yes, we can do it.
|
|
|
0:47:15 – 0:47:19
That's fine. Read the book, he can.
|
|
|
0:47:19 – 0:47:25
Oh man, ey, this is …
|
|
|
0:47:25 – 0:47:28
You want to tell me that, right …?
|
|
|
0:47:28 – 0:47:31
Yes, so …
|
|
|
0:47:31 – 0:47:34
Okay, okay.
|
|
|
0:47:34 – 0:47:40
Frank likes to read newspaper articles every now and then.
|
|
|
0:47:40 – 0:47:41
Or a newsticker.
|
|
|
0:47:41 – 0:47:49
Yes, I mean he already has a small plus point, but he's paired with a minus point.
|
|
|
0:47:49 – 0:47:59
He managed to mention, at least in the audio track, where he got these reports from.
|
|
|
0:47:59 – 0:48:00
Well, sources.
|
|
|
0:48:00 – 0:48:07
Exactly, but you actually have to put the source information in the show notes, for example.
|
|
|
0:48:07 – 0:48:09
Or in the video description.
|
|
|
0:48:09 – 0:48:13
That's because you're a content creator.
|
|
|
0:48:13 – 0:48:16
Well, there's still room for improvement.
|
|
|
0:48:16 – 0:48:21
I'm glad you mentioned it in the audio track.
|
|
|
0:48:21 – 0:48:25
Where you got the information, but there's room for improvement.
|
|
|
0:48:25 – 0:48:35
And then he reads the newspaper articles about Frank,
|
|
|
0:48:35 – 0:48:37
Oh, by Fabian.
|
|
|
0:48:37 – 0:48:39
From Fabian.
|
|
|
0:48:39 – 0:48:45
I also like to talk about the election.
|
|
|
0:48:45 – 0:48:54
This was also a huge topic and is still a huge topic that went viral, where everyone talked about the election.
|
|
|
0:48:54 – 0:48:58
But you have to say, first Frank made fun of it,
|
|
|
0:48:58 – 0:49:04
to be a bit of a contempt for people to stop at this true crime bubble,
|
|
|
0:49:04 – 0:49:11
have reported on the case of Fabian or the other, other large cases.
|
|
|
0:49:11 – 0:49:14
But do it yourself.
|
|
|
0:49:14 – 0:49:19
Then he made fun of people who talked about the forest,
|
|
|
0:49:19 – 0:49:22
He was stranded in the Baltic Sea.
|
|
|
0:49:22 – 0:49:30
And what does he do? Read the news ticker or the newspaper reports about the election.
|
|
|
0:49:30 – 0:49:37
And that's how you think, why do you make fun of it first and then just put out the same content?
|
|
|
0:49:37 – 0:49:45
Yes man, because what everyone else is doing is shit and what he's doing is mega good and eloquent.
|
|
|
0:49:45 – 0:49:57
Yes, but this might not be more likely because this is just such a topic, which is of social interest or has a certain bubble interest, just like in the True Crime Bubble these cases.
|
|
|
0:49:57 – 0:50:03
And that actually brings a small advantage.
|
|
|
0:50:03 – 0:50:07
Yes, of course. It's a clickbait theme.
|
|
|
0:50:07 – 0:50:09
So it's business.
|
|
|
0:50:09 – 0:50:10
That's right.
|
|
|
0:50:10 – 0:50:11
That's fine.
|
|
|
0:50:11 – 0:50:22
I would say that interest is so semi-existent, but at least he has read articles.
|
|
|
0:50:22 – 0:50:30
Yes, I wanted to say, the choice, if you are interested in it, then yes.
|
|
|
0:50:30 – 0:50:37
But the matter with the young Fabian has already been noticed.
|
|
|
0:50:37 – 0:50:43
And you've noticed that, and you're getting enough of what's going on in the courtroom.
|
|
|
0:50:43 – 0:50:49
This happens because there are a lot of people reporting about it, including on TikTok and everywhere.
|
|
|
0:50:49 – 0:50:54
This is a topic that people are already interested in.
|
|
|
0:50:54 – 0:51:01
Yes, especially for this case, yes, I believe, even structurally a conversion measure
|
|
|
0:51:01 – 0:51:10
made in the court, so that quite a lot of press people can also find space in the audience,
|
|
|
0:51:10 – 0:51:18
in addition to the defence and secondary action, the public prosecutor's office and the judges,
|
|
|
0:51:18 – 0:51:21
Because I think it's an oath, but I'm not sure.
|
|
|
0:51:21 – 0:51:27
Please don't outlaw me for that. In any case, because of the range of people and also
|
|
|
0:51:27 – 0:51:38
Relatives and so on, had to wait there much more space and extra safety precautions were taken.
|
|
|
0:51:38 – 0:51:42
They were then increased again because of this case.
|
|
|
0:51:42 – 0:51:44
Yeah, that's right.
|
|
|
0:51:44 – 0:51:49
Yes, in any case, we can just remember that.
|
|
|
0:51:49 – 0:51:52
Read the book, he can.
|
|
|
0:51:52 – 0:51:55
Yeah, there he is.
|
|
|
0:51:55 – 0:51:57
Tip in it.
|
|
|
0:51:57 – 0:52:01
I can't do it so well. Definitely not.
|
|
|
0:52:01 – 0:52:06
No, I can't do it too well. I get bored every now and then.
|
|
|
0:52:06 – 0:52:11
Then we come to our favorite topic block.
|
|
|
0:52:11 – 0:52:13
The Flatterman of the Week.
|
|
|
0:52:13 – 0:52:15
The Flatterman of the Week.
|
|
|
0:52:15 – 0:52:24
So as we put this together now, we had to smile a bit,
|
|
|
0:52:24 – 0:52:32
There were some fluttering men of the week, also a few more or less desired.
|
|
|
0:52:32 – 0:52:39
Yes, desired ones are not presented to us in principle.
|
|
|
0:52:39 – 0:52:43
No, they're mentioned sometimes, but …
|
|
|
0:52:43 – 0:52:54
Yes, but then not because we see it as a flutterman of the week, but because it's their own
|
|
|
0:52:54 – 0:53:01
He is the chosen flatterer of the week. That's right. Then we say that too. Yes, and we take
|
|
|
0:53:01 – 0:53:06
No fluttering men of the week, if it is too obvious that it should be a fluttering man of the week.
|
|
|
0:53:06 – 0:53:09
Yeah, if it's already staged like that.
|
|
|
0:53:09 – 0:53:10
Exactly.
|
|
|
0:53:10 – 0:53:16
Yeah, but I don't know, did we get there?
|
|
|
0:53:16 – 0:53:19
No, I think the two of them even came up with it themselves.
|
|
|
0:53:19 – 0:53:22
The melon and grapefruit gate.
|
|
|
0:53:22 – 0:53:28
Yes, so I would have called it cherry or horngate.
|
|
|
0:53:28 – 0:53:31
Yeah, that would have been better somehow.
|
|
|
0:53:31 – 0:53:34
Yes, so a swerding of the two as well.
|
|
|
0:53:34 – 0:53:42
Christine says, "Let's go with the flat joke!"
|
|
|
0:53:42 – 0:53:53
And then she says, "Lautfunk, that was a promise! Shallow jokes! Let's start with the flat jokes!
|
|
|
0:53:53 – 0:54:02
What then the Franz says "But they are not so flat!"
|
|
|
0:54:02 – 0:54:06
Yeah, that was situational comic, wasn't it?
|
|
|
0:54:06 – 0:54:11
Definitely because that was definitely not wanted.
|
|
|
0:54:11 – 0:54:16
She was embarrassed. I mean, that could have happened to me, too.
|
|
|
0:54:16 – 0:54:20
It's stupid, of course, if it's such a livestream situation.
|
|
|
0:54:20 – 0:54:25
Yes, above all, Frank had brought before somehow such a typical Frank-speech.
|
|
|
0:54:25 – 0:54:28
And that was a flat joke.
|
|
|
0:54:28 – 0:54:32
And then she blows it out. That was so horny.
|
|
|
0:54:32 – 0:54:37
Yeah, that was really funny. We laughed tears.
|
|
|
0:54:37 – 0:54:46
But if we are already so in this matter, then the next point fits quite well.
|
|
|
0:54:46 – 0:54:48
Yeah, then tell us the point.
|
|
|
0:54:48 – 0:54:53
So I'd say that's so typical old white humor, old white man humor.
|
|
|
0:54:53 – 0:55:12
It just came to the breakfast club, I think that was yesterday or what today, I don't know, a new user came in, a new user and he had the name "Underconda"
|
|
|
0:55:12 – 0:55:20
And now you can imagine this situation in such a way that Frank then, after Jutta
|
|
|
0:55:20 – 0:55:27
had greeted him, immediately reached out and said, and now I quote verbatim,
|
|
|
0:55:27 – 0:55:35
When I look down in the morning in the bath by the sea, I also see an Andaconda.
|
|
|
0:55:35 – 0:55:38
Yeah, what do you say, honey?
|
|
|
0:55:38 – 0:55:47
Yes, that's nice, but that's information that I don't think anyone wanted to know.
|
|
|
0:55:47 – 0:55:57
I mean, these are private moments. I mean, you can enjoy them, so what? But I believe
|
|
|
0:55:57 – 0:56:04
Not that the world wants to know. Especially not in 2026.
|
|
|
0:56:04 – 0:56:10
Stop the old ball buzzer, it's not funny.
|
|
|
0:56:10 – 0:56:12
This is such a facepalm moment.
|
|
|
0:56:12 – 0:56:14
Such a...
|
|
|
0:56:14 – 0:56:17
Oh, God, he didn't say.
|
|
|
0:56:17 – 0:56:18
Such a moment.
|
|
|
0:56:18 – 0:56:22
So to follow in Frank's footsteps.
|
|
|
0:56:22 – 0:56:28
Does the Anaconda then also give standing ovation when he brings such sayings?
|
|
|
0:56:28 – 0:56:33
Yes, or even a Frank saying to optimize.
|
|
|
0:56:33 – 0:56:35
Or is he just working it?
|
|
|
0:56:35 – 0:56:38
Oh, nice thing!
|
|
|
0:56:38 – 0:56:40
Nice thing, Harry, nice thing!
|
|
|
0:56:40 – 0:56:45
And that was just a supplement now.
|
|
|
0:56:45 – 0:56:48
It was a suggestion of what could have been said.
|
|
|
0:56:48 – 0:56:50
Exactly.
|
|
|
0:56:50 – 0:56:53
I wouldn't say that.
|
|
|
0:56:53 – 0:56:57
No, I'd say...
|
|
|
0:56:57 – 0:57:02
I wouldn't baptize my Sascha at the condor, but no matter.
|
|
|
0:57:02 – 0:57:09
Nobody wants to know, man. Stop making Frank.
|
|
|
0:57:09 – 0:57:15
No, so I don't say anything to … anymore.
|
|
|
0:57:15 – 0:57:17
It's better.
|
|
|
0:57:17 – 0:57:27
But this is so typical Frank, such sayings and then always so easily spawned.
|
|
|
0:57:27 – 0:57:31
Yeah, I'm like, who's supposed to find this funny?
|
|
|
0:57:31 – 0:57:37
I mean, we'll be lifted up the crutches
|
|
|
0:57:37 – 0:57:42
and then the ladies walk in a circle with joy with the rollator when they hear that.
|
|
|
0:57:42 – 0:57:44
I don't know.
|
|
|
0:57:44 – 0:57:46
It had been the same.
|
|
|
0:57:46 – 0:57:51
Someone said that Jutta was in a
|
|
|
0:57:51 – 0:57:59
Funeral memory Sunday club had excited that stop at...
|
|
|
0:57:59 – 0:58:01
Who was that with? Which singer?
|
|
|
0:58:01 – 0:58:11
For some singer, the first row "100 Leg" has somehow been such a saying with "Go help me" somehow something.
|
|
|
0:58:11 – 0:58:15
And then Jutta felt herself kicked so animalically on the tie.
|
|
|
0:58:15 – 0:58:17
Frank thought the saying was pretty good.
|
|
|
0:58:17 – 0:58:27
As you can see, it's his kind of humor. I mean, okay, I think it's a bit out of place now and a bit out of time.
|
|
|
0:58:27 – 0:58:32
But now you have to see my saying out of place and fallen out of time.
|
|
|
0:58:32 – 0:58:36
Yes, but it was in the context of Frank's sayings.
|
|
|
0:58:36 – 0:58:43
Yes, but in fact it goes in the direction that it is just as short.
|
|
|
0:58:43 – 0:58:48
Yes, but it is a critical examination of what has been said.
|
|
|
0:58:48 – 0:58:51
And then again it is in a different light.
|
|
|
0:58:51 – 0:58:53
If you say so.
|
|
|
0:58:53 – 0:58:54
Yeah, it's like that.
|
|
|
0:58:54 – 0:58:58
After all, we are a non-journalistic format.
|
|
|
0:58:58 – 0:59:00
A block of opinion.
|
|
|
0:59:00 – 0:59:04
Ojojojo, I just had to reusp myself.
|
|
|
0:59:04 – 0:59:06
Yeah, I heard it.
|
|
|
0:59:06 – 0:59:10
I'm sure the neighbors heard that all around.
|
|
|
0:59:10 – 0:59:13
So above, below and next to us?
|
|
|
0:59:13 – 0:59:14
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:59:14 – 0:59:15
Okay.
|
|
|
0:59:15 – 0:59:22
Let's do the second part of the house-making.
|
|
|
0:59:22 – 0:59:31
Yes, folks, and imagine, for the people who haven't seen it yet, it has
|
|
|
0:59:31 – 0:59:34
Pigs and frogs rained from the sky at the same time.
|
|
|
0:59:34 – 0:59:39
We opened a gate.
|
|
|
0:59:39 – 0:59:41
Oh my God!
|
|
|
0:59:41 – 0:59:48
That we'd never have a chance to actually do that someday.
|
|
|
0:59:48 – 0:59:59
No, so there was something where we thought we would never have done that or something, or you, to enter a live of Maren.
|
|
|
0:59:59 – 1:00:04
But that had now reached the next level.
|
|
|
1:00:04 – 1:00:10
So the next one would be a 140 million Euro lottery win.
|
|
|
1:00:10 – 1:00:15
I think that's impossible.
|
|
|
1:00:15 – 1:00:21
Maybe fate will bring some happiness.
|
|
|
1:00:21 – 1:00:25
In the lucky streak that we have at the moment, in any case.
|
|
|
1:00:25 – 1:00:27
Toi, toi, toi.
|
|
|
1:00:27 – 1:00:33
Man, yeah. So folks, to make it short, spoiler alert, we had a TikTok livestream.
|
|
|
1:00:33 – 1:00:35
Very spontaneously, very spontaneously.
|
|
|
1:00:35 – 1:00:42
Very spontaneous, because I came home and we had something to eat and then I said,
|
|
|
1:00:42 – 1:00:47
Nostalgia, because we used to livestream while eating or cooking,
|
|
|
1:00:47 – 1:00:55
Let's go live. And since it didn't work on Instagram and we just wanted to go live on Insta
|
|
|
1:00:55 – 1:00:57
and I somehow didn't get it there,
|
|
|
1:00:57 – 1:00:59
shame on me,
|
|
|
1:00:59 – 1:01:01
We switched to TikTok.
|
|
|
1:01:01 – 1:01:04
And then I put the link in the Insta story
|
|
|
1:01:04 – 1:01:06
And I said come in.
|
|
|
1:01:06 – 1:01:09
Yes, and there were people.
|
|
|
1:01:09 – 1:01:14
And so, I'd say, so the first 15, 20 minutes
|
|
|
1:01:14 – 1:01:19
The chat was still very slow because it was
|
|
|
1:01:19 – 1:01:24
few people from Instagram in it, it was generally in the entire livestream
|
|
|
1:01:24 – 1:01:33
Very few people. Yes, so on average so 20 to 30. In fact, old people have come in from the
|
|
|
1:01:33 – 1:01:38
It's time we streamed. We were also happy. The viewers years ago
|
|
|
1:01:38 – 1:01:42
They were with us, but they can't do anything with the Frank topic at all. They were
|
|
|
1:01:42 – 1:01:50
Even for a moment, that was cool. In any case, a guest came. Somehow you have
|
|
|
1:01:50 – 1:01:57
Justifies that the person is watching. But where we didn't do justice, it's that they did it.
|
|
|
1:01:57 – 1:02:03
You can also watch the livestream. I was surprised because there was suddenly the television chest "Look
|
|
|
1:02:03 – 1:02:10
to". And the chat made us aware of it. Exactly and then we said "Hello Frank".
|
|
|
1:02:10 – 1:02:16
Yes, and he replied, but I don't know what. I think
|
|
|
1:02:16 – 1:02:27
He also said hello or something and then he sent five roses to TikTok. Five roses and
|
|
|
1:02:27 – 1:02:35
It is written that they are for Sasha. That's right. And I don't exist that way, so in
|
|
|
1:02:35 – 1:02:44
Frank's world, that's why they were for Sascha, of course. And then came another five.
|
|
|
1:02:44 – 1:02:52
Roses, then there were a total of ten roses. And then people wrote that we should
|
|
|
1:02:52 – 1:03:00
Let's get Frank in. Yes, and I've already asked questions. That's right, Frank. And then we had
|
|
|
1:03:00 – 1:03:07
thought, you know what, now it's raining pigs and frogs from the sky at the same time, let's get some
|
|
|
1:03:07 – 1:03:16
Frank's in. That's what we did. Frank was actually over an hour, so I think
|
|
|
1:03:16 – 1:03:28
Almost two hours with us guest in the livestream. Along with Talnews. In addition to Talnews, he was only later
|
|
|
1:03:28 – 1:03:39
came to that. And we had an interesting exchange. Yeah, that's right. We had different
|
|
|
1:03:39 – 1:03:47
Things spoken. One has also, I call it almost small talk, had a little far in the
|
|
|
1:03:47 – 1:03:55
Livestream and people found it interesting how friendly we treat each other. So the
|
|
|
1:03:55 – 1:04:06
Frank and me together. I'm gonna tell you a secret. We are adults and
|
|
|
1:04:06 – 1:04:13
I don't necessarily have to be particularly flawed to ask critical questions.
|
|
|
1:04:13 – 1:04:19
And the chat also asked questions, which we then also asked them on Frank.
|
|
|
1:04:19 – 1:04:26
Exactly and only because we see Frank as a human being critically and there is the file Flattermann,
|
|
|
1:04:26 – 1:04:31
Doesn't mean that you can't meet people kindly and on an equal footing,
|
|
|
1:04:31 – 1:04:40
with whom you talk. That's right. That's exactly what we did. The conversation was for that,
|
|
|
1:04:40 – 1:04:51
What was nice, you have to say. So it was uncritical, it was relaxed,
|
|
|
1:04:51 – 1:04:54
It wasn't like they were sniffing at it now. You already have
|
|
|
1:04:54 – 1:05:00
I've noticed that some of the questions I've been asked aren't so good now.
|
|
|
1:05:00 – 1:05:08
I've been shocked and I've responded more vigorously. But he has stopped
|
|
|
1:05:08 – 1:05:12
In the typical Frank way, things are now so explained from his point of view.
|
|
|
1:05:12 – 1:05:19
So we had questions about the debt with the money, which then Lexi owes.
|
|
|
1:05:19 – 1:05:26
We have been asked questions about the topic "Donations" and there we have our view
|
|
|
1:05:26 – 1:05:31
Let the things be explained again. He set out his view.
|
|
|
1:05:31 – 1:05:35
By the way, he also had there, because that fits well into the file Flattermann,
|
|
|
1:05:35 – 1:05:38
I'm also curious to see if this is still to come.
|
|
|
1:05:38 – 1:05:45
He also said, because it was asked, what actually happened to the donations,
|
|
|
1:05:45 – 1:05:48
Which he got because of the GoFoundMe campaign.
|
|
|
1:05:48 – 1:05:49
Yes, after the change.
|
|
|
1:05:49 – 1:05:50
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:05:50 – 1:05:55
The questions we asked, but not only after the change, but in general times the
|
|
|
1:05:55 – 1:05:59
Transparency, where did the money that was donated go?
|
|
|
1:05:59 – 1:06:06
And then he said it, and then we said it would be nice.
|
|
|
1:06:06 – 1:06:10
also for his remaining viewers, because in the live stream only approximately,
|
|
|
1:06:10 – 1:06:18
I think there were 25 or 26 people who thought it would be good for the rest of the audience.
|
|
|
1:06:18 – 1:06:23
to show transparency, because a lot of people have these questions,
|
|
|
1:06:23 – 1:06:26
Fans and critics alike,
|
|
|
1:06:26 – 1:06:30
If you want to know what happened to that money,
|
|
|
1:06:30 – 1:06:31
what it was used for.
|
|
|
1:06:31 – 1:06:35
We then said that he could blacken the sensitive data,
|
|
|
1:06:35 – 1:06:38
So speak any
|
|
|
1:06:38 – 1:06:42
Account numbers, names, purpose.
|
|
|
1:06:42 – 1:06:44
It doesn't have to be all there.
|
|
|
1:06:44 – 1:06:48
But so that you just show yes, people who donate,
|
|
|
1:06:48 – 1:06:52
which you have donated to me, are there and there at the places
|
|
|
1:06:52 – 1:06:54
Stop arrived.
|
|
|
1:06:54 – 1:06:56
I used them for that.
|
|
|
1:06:56 – 1:07:00
That's what he meant, memory log,
|
|
|
1:07:00 – 1:07:04
He could imagine doing that.
|
|
|
1:07:04 – 1:07:05
That's right.
|
|
|
1:07:05 – 1:07:08
A video about where he makes a transparency,
|
|
|
1:07:08 – 1:07:10
We really liked that.
|
|
|
1:07:10 – 1:07:12
Whether he does it, we don't know.
|
|
|
1:07:12 – 1:07:16
We mentioned it again on the podcast.
|
|
|
1:07:16 – 1:07:18
Mm-hmm.
|
|
|
1:07:18 – 1:07:21
And yes, we are waiting.
|
|
|
1:07:21 – 1:07:26
The next issue was the debt issue to Lexi.
|
|
|
1:07:26 – 1:07:30
And that's where he set out his view of things.
|
|
|
1:07:30 – 1:07:39
And the offer with the 100 euros, I mean, he has already communicated that, we have already taken up that one or two times.
|
|
|
1:07:39 – 1:07:43
And we also told them that 100 euros is simply too little.
|
|
|
1:07:43 – 1:07:46
Yes, with a dispute value of 10,000 euros.
|
|
|
1:07:46 – 1:07:47
From 11,000.
|
|
|
1:07:47 – 1:07:48
11.000.
|
|
|
1:07:48 – 1:07:55
11,000 euros is that, so 11,200 or 11,400 and there are still more interest rates on it,
|
|
|
1:07:55 – 1:08:02
That's just too little to pay off in an acceptable time.
|
|
|
1:08:02 – 1:08:05
At 100 Euro you are at roundabout eleven years.
|
|
|
1:08:05 – 1:08:15
Yes, and we had then also said that no creditor actually wants to wait eleven years for his money,
|
|
|
1:08:15 – 1:08:17
that he was awarded.
|
|
|
1:08:17 – 1:08:18
Above all, you only pay in the end,
|
|
|
1:08:18 – 1:08:22
So you paid off the 11,000 euros relatively quickly,
|
|
|
1:08:22 – 1:08:26
But you only pay the interest on it for years.
|
|
|
1:08:26 – 1:08:29
Yeah, that's right.
|
|
|
1:08:29 – 1:08:33
And if you think about it, the normal interest rate plus
|
|
|
1:08:33 – 1:08:37
plus this base interest rate, of which four percent or what they are now
|
|
|
1:08:37 – 1:08:41
For this period of time, that's a lot of money.
|
|
|
1:08:42 – 1:08:50
Yes, in addition, according to the memory protocol, he reacted in such a way that he said, yes, either
|
|
|
1:08:50 – 1:08:55
She should have taken the 100 euros, because he would have had a payment morale.
|
|
|
1:08:55 – 1:08:56
willingness to pay.
|
|
|
1:08:56 – 1:08:58
Yes, I mean, willingness to pay.
|
|
|
1:08:58 – 1:09:02
Or she just doesn't get any money, it's her decision.
|
|
|
1:09:02 – 1:09:09
I mean, on the one hand you have to say, yes, he shows a certain willingness to pay, but
|
|
|
1:09:09 – 1:09:15
He also has to pay, apart from that, if he pays 100 euros, but the rate is
|
|
|
1:09:15 – 1:09:17
Simply strikingly low.
|
|
|
1:09:17 – 1:09:24
But now we also have to say on the other side, because we want to break this down,
|
|
|
1:09:24 – 1:09:29
You have to figure out how much income a person has.
|
|
|
1:09:29 – 1:09:36
And now it's the case that he doesn't make the millions on YouTube now, he's self-employed,
|
|
|
1:09:36 – 1:09:42
He has to pay taxes, the cost of living.
|
|
|
1:09:42 – 1:09:45
Then people fall away, such as Gravalenta.
|
|
|
1:09:45 – 1:09:47
He has very few topics that click well.
|
|
|
1:09:47 – 1:09:53
He doesn't earn thousands of dollars a month.
|
|
|
1:09:53 – 1:10:03
Of course, 100 euros are strikingly low, but it will always be a bit the height
|
|
|
1:10:03 – 1:10:09
What you pay for is always based on your salary.
|
|
|
1:10:09 – 1:10:15
Yes, that's the case with such judicial matters. So when the court decides how much you should pay.
|
|
|
1:10:15 – 1:10:17
Isn't that so?
|
|
|
1:10:17 – 1:10:24
Then you assume how much you're punishing or something. Then it comes to the
|
|
|
1:10:24 – 1:10:27
income. Then the daily rates are calculated.
|
|
|
1:10:27 – 1:10:29
Okay, isn't that the case with him now?
|
|
|
1:10:29 – 1:10:31
No, it's not.
|
|
|
1:10:31 – 1:10:39
So he owes sum X and either he stutters it or he can pay it on a batch.
|
|
|
1:10:39 – 1:10:42
It would be cheaper on a batch.
|
|
|
1:10:42 – 1:10:46
Yes, it would also save interest and so on.
|
|
|
1:10:46 – 1:10:48
Yeah, a lot of interest.
|
|
|
1:10:48 – 1:10:50
Yeah, that's it.
|
|
|
1:10:50 – 1:10:56
Well, now you can understand Lexi, of course, because I would feel the same way,
|
|
|
1:10:56 – 1:11:03
If I were to wait more than 11 years for my money, it would go crazy on my sack.
|
|
|
1:11:03 – 1:11:07
And that's not just the compensation you've paid.
|
|
|
1:11:07 – 1:11:12
The pain money, but that's also the lawyer's fees, the court costs and you haven't seen them.
|
|
|
1:11:12 – 1:11:19
And that's a hell of a lot of money, which is still flowing down the ranks.
|
|
|
1:11:19 – 1:11:23
Yes, especially since she had to pay for everything herself first.
|
|
|
1:11:23 – 1:11:25
Mmm, that's right.
|
|
|
1:11:25 – 1:11:36
Lexi is also not a multimillionaire and you just have to see that she wants her money, of course.
|
|
|
1:11:36 – 1:11:50
Yes, and not everyone has an attitude like other people who had to get money from Frank, that they say, okay, I accept this little Rata, because then he does not think of me every month until he has paid it.
|
|
|
1:11:50 – 1:12:04
Not everyone thinks so. Maybe Lexi just wants this, this chapter, and then just go on with normal life and don't have to deal with this shit.
|
|
|
1:12:04 – 1:12:18
Yes, I can understand that. Another thing is that he had also said that she could, for example, also seek the conversation with him or something else. I don't know the exact context.
|
|
|
1:12:18 – 1:12:20
That's about what that said.
|
|
|
1:12:20 – 1:12:22
And I think that's pretty difficult.
|
|
|
1:12:22 – 1:12:25
Yes, because one must not forget,
|
|
|
1:12:25 – 1:12:29
Lexi is right not to speak well to you,
|
|
|
1:12:29 – 1:12:33
Frank, and she just doesn't want to have any contact with you.
|
|
|
1:12:33 – 1:12:38
And you have to respect that when there's something to communicate,
|
|
|
1:12:38 – 1:12:43
What needs to be communicated, of course, can be done through lawyers.
|
|
|
1:12:43 – 1:12:45
But Frank isn't in the position either.
|
|
|
1:12:46 – 1:12:51
to demand from Lexi that she should or must comment on any matter.
|
|
|
1:12:51 – 1:12:54
And that position is not.
|
|
|
1:12:54 – 1:12:58
Conversely, you have to say, but you are not always in the position,
|
|
|
1:12:58 – 1:13:02
Again and again, Frank draws attention to this topic.
|
|
|
1:13:02 – 1:13:06
There you have to say, if you want your peace,
|
|
|
1:13:06 – 1:13:09
then you should go the way generally through lawyers
|
|
|
1:13:09 – 1:13:15
This should be done privately or by legal means.
|
|
|
1:13:16 – 1:13:22
I don't think it's worth it if you somehow don't want to be mentioned in public anymore,
|
|
|
1:13:22 – 1:13:29
But then other content creators, for example, this topic, as we now also almost mentioned again and again.
|
|
|
1:13:29 – 1:13:38
Yes, because it almost causes you to react to it.
|
|
|
1:13:38 – 1:13:40
Yes, that's the Streisand effect.
|
|
|
1:13:40 – 1:13:42
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:13:42 – 1:13:45
Not that the defiance had, that of course he also had consequences.
|
|
|
1:13:45 – 1:13:47
Our little life.
|
|
|
1:13:47 – 1:13:50
Yes, people found it strange,
|
|
|
1:13:50 – 1:13:56
That we communicated with Frank on a friendly, factual level.
|
|
|
1:13:56 – 1:13:59
Many people actually thought it was good.
|
|
|
1:13:59 – 1:14:02
Some found it neutral who said
|
|
|
1:14:02 – 1:14:07
You're a critic of Frank.
|
|
|
1:14:07 – 1:14:11
It's amazing that you can communicate with these people on such a level.
|
|
|
1:14:11 – 1:14:18
Others found it nice, as I said, that you can sometimes go into a normal exchange,
|
|
|
1:14:18 – 1:14:26
It doesn't always have to be that way. There are views, and that is
|
|
|
1:14:26 – 1:14:30
Always in life, you can share it with someone. In other things, you are
|
|
|
1:14:30 – 1:14:36
Take a completely different view. Yes, even if you disagree completely,
|
|
|
1:14:36 – 1:14:46
In 99, maybe even 100 percent of the aspects, that doesn't mean that you can't
|
|
|
1:14:46 – 1:14:55
can be maintained at an adult and tyre level. You don't have to yell, yell
|
|
|
1:14:55 – 1:14:59
And smear it with shit. – No, others do.
|
|
|
1:14:59 – 1:15:05
Others can do it very well and much better. – Exactly. We don't do that. We had
|
|
|
1:15:05 – 1:15:12
tries to be critical by also asking the questions that have been asked by viewers,
|
|
|
1:15:12 – 1:15:20
They also asked questions. Which was not always easy, because Frank had a lot of speaking time for
|
|
|
1:15:20 – 1:15:26
has claimed. And, of course, does not necessarily express itself as the spectators or
|
|
|
1:15:26 – 1:15:32
That's what we want, but he's expressing himself the way he wants to in the moment. And this is
|
|
|
1:15:32 – 1:15:39
Even if it's partly up to us to express his right the way he wants it.
|
|
|
1:15:39 – 1:15:44
Yeah, I mean, we're not sitting here with the police or the prosecutor or
|
|
|
1:15:44 – 1:15:52
It was a stupid, banal livestream. It had been so,
|
|
|
1:15:52 – 1:15:58
that they complained that we were too nice and are no longer authentic,
|
|
|
1:15:58 – 1:16:05
Because we weren't critical or radical enough.
|
|
|
1:16:05 – 1:16:15
Yes, so the expectation was not met that we would completely freak out or, for example, also
|
|
|
1:16:15 – 1:16:22
Dox things – and that goes without saying – with content that was private. That's what I want
|
|
|
1:16:22 – 1:16:29
Do not enter. But I'm talking about screenshots etc. I'm not going to say anything about the content. Where we would have
|
|
|
1:16:29 – 1:16:39
Let's talk about it, Frank, and we didn't do that. Why? Because screenshots are private.
|
|
|
1:16:39 – 1:16:45
There were private conversations about what we had the screenshots of and we can
|
|
|
1:16:45 – 1:16:52
Not to thematize? Yes, firstly because there is such a thing as data protection. There is such a thing as
|
|
|
1:16:52 – 1:16:59
The right of personality. Yes, and we will be the first to receive a reminder.
|
|
|
1:16:59 – 1:17:06
I know that's not going to satisfy many now, the answer, but it is. And that wanted
|
|
|
1:17:06 – 1:17:10
I've been talking about it for a long time because it really annoys me.
|
|
|
1:17:10 – 1:17:14
How people react in part on Instagram.
|
|
|
1:17:14 – 1:17:17
Because, you have to see it from our point of view.
|
|
|
1:17:17 – 1:17:19
It's not just Instagram, it's also on YouTube.
|
|
|
1:17:19 – 1:17:22
Yes, as a content creator.
|
|
|
1:17:22 – 1:17:26
You write to us, we answer you.
|
|
|
1:17:26 – 1:17:30
You send us content, including content,
|
|
|
1:17:30 – 1:17:32
which should not be discussed in public,
|
|
|
1:17:32 – 1:17:36
because (a) they cannot be verified;
|
|
|
1:17:36 – 1:17:39
because they violate the personal rights of others
|
|
|
1:17:39 – 1:17:45
or data protection. These are things we can't say in our livestream because
|
|
|
1:17:45 – 1:17:53
Otherwise, we will get the next lawsuit from XY. We don't want that. But there are people,
|
|
|
1:17:53 – 1:17:58
They react angry and are pissed off that you don't mention these things. And to
|
|
|
1:17:58 – 1:18:03
I would like to tell these people, if you absolutely want these topics to be publicized.
|
|
|
1:18:03 – 1:18:08
If you wear it, grab your phone. Not everyone needs a professional setup.
|
|
|
1:18:08 – 1:18:13
with microphone. A simple cell phone is enough. Then you create an AI image, make a YouTube channel
|
|
|
1:18:13 – 1:18:20
on and then you can dox all this content and you can build in a thousand screenshots. You can
|
|
|
1:18:20 – 1:18:25
I also like to do it in your Instagram stories, yes. But demands
|
|
|
1:18:25 – 1:18:32
But not from us, because then we are liable for having to talk about it.
|
|
|
1:18:32 – 1:18:37
And what is also interesting, then we should not say from whom we have the screenshot,
|
|
|
1:18:37 – 1:18:42
Because then you suddenly don't want to have anything to do with it when there's stress.
|
|
|
1:18:42 – 1:18:45
That's something that annoys me insanely.
|
|
|
1:18:45 – 1:18:48
If you have something to say, say it yourself.
|
|
|
1:18:48 – 1:18:52
We listen to that, but don't blame us.
|
|
|
1:18:52 – 1:18:55
If we don't want to talk about these things in public,
|
|
|
1:18:55 – 1:18:59
Because then we get in trouble with the legislator.
|
|
|
1:18:59 – 1:19:03
Either we get into trouble with Frank, for example,
|
|
|
1:19:03 – 1:19:07
Frank's in it and other people I'm not going to name now.
|
|
|
1:19:07 – 1:19:12
I mean, we've said that many times. We have so much information
|
|
|
1:19:12 – 1:19:17
available. If we doxed all this, a few people would be really shitty.
|
|
|
1:19:17 – 1:19:22
And really stupid. And we're not just talking about Frank, we're talking about a bunch of people.
|
|
|
1:19:22 – 1:19:27
Exactly. And we don't make it public because we can't make it public.
|
|
|
1:19:27 – 1:19:32
Yeah, exactly because we can't.
|
|
|
1:19:32 – 1:19:34
Because we can't, and if we did,
|
|
|
1:19:34 – 1:19:37
We need really good lawyers and a lot of money.
|
|
|
1:19:37 – 1:19:41
Yes, and then we should also see that we are moving to another country,
|
|
|
1:19:41 – 1:19:43
We are not condemned under German law.
|
|
|
1:19:43 – 1:19:49
Yes, because with the best star lawyer in Germany, it doesn't look good,
|
|
|
1:19:49 – 1:19:57
if you shit in this way and violate the data protection and personal rights of others.
|
|
|
1:19:57 – 1:20:10
When we think about what kind of emails we got, where it was broken down to the smallest bit, what the wedding of Frank cost and "hate not seen" and this and that.
|
|
|
1:20:10 – 1:20:12
You can't use all that.
|
|
|
1:20:12 – 1:20:26
Yes, it's interesting to read. It's interesting so "Oh cool, I didn't even know" or "Oha krass" or "Oha krass that something like that was said or something like that happened."
|
|
|
1:20:26 – 1:20:35
But that's just content, we can't address that, because this material was never available to the public.
|
|
|
1:20:35 – 1:20:41
We are only allowed to address things that have been said publicly, that have been shared publicly.
|
|
|
1:20:41 – 1:20:49
We really, really, really don't want to be sued tens of times by other people.
|
|
|
1:20:49 – 1:20:58
As I said, in addition to the people who send us screenshots, they also send us the money for the lawyer and the entire trial.
|
|
|
1:20:58 – 1:21:02
Then we can talk about it again in advance.
|
|
|
1:21:02 – 1:21:08
As long as it's civil, it's not an issue. If it's going to be criminal, it's different.
|
|
|
1:21:08 – 1:21:12
But if you want to finance the fun, please.
|
|
|
1:21:12 – 1:21:14
Yes, but only advance payment.
|
|
|
1:21:14 – 1:21:15
That's right.
|
|
|
1:21:15 – 1:21:23
And that will be our attitude in the future. You are welcome to send us further information.
|
|
|
1:21:23 – 1:21:29
However, we will not forward or publish such information.
|
|
|
1:21:29 – 1:21:34
For us, it may serve to some extent privately the classification.
|
|
|
1:21:34 – 1:21:38
You're also curious, most people are.
|
|
|
1:21:38 – 1:21:41
Yes, that also makes the picture somehow more complete and rounded.
|
|
|
1:21:41 – 1:21:48
Yes, but we can't use it and all the people who demand it from us …
|
|
|
1:21:48 – 1:21:49
Do it yourself!
|
|
|
1:21:49 – 1:21:55
Do it yourself in the future, do it yourself. Point.
|
|
|
1:21:55 – 1:22:00
And if you're going to be on trial at some point, I'd like to see you.
|
|
|
1:22:00 – 1:22:02
Or when the lawyers knocked.
|
|
|
1:22:02 – 1:22:10
Because the thing is always, it always gets serious and you suddenly understand what it's all about when you get breasts yourself.
|
|
|
1:22:10 – 1:22:14
And the first bill flutters in.
|
|
|
1:22:14 – 1:22:19
Then you know what you're on and what it's about.
|
|
|
1:22:19 – 1:22:26
Yes, not everyone has the advantage that it doesn't matter what a lawyer costs, but
|
|
|
1:22:26 – 1:22:29
Some people have to pay for it themselves.
|
|
|
1:22:29 – 1:22:36
That's right. And don't do a fundraising campaign or have someone stop paying for it.
|
|
|
1:22:36 – 1:22:40
Exactly. But people don't care.
|
|
|
1:22:40 – 1:22:44
Exactly. But it's easier to be outraged,
|
|
|
1:22:44 – 1:22:46
That you were too nice, too uncritical.
|
|
|
1:22:46 – 1:22:49
And why didn't you say that and why didn't you say that?
|
|
|
1:22:49 – 1:22:52
Yes, we were in a situation.
|
|
|
1:22:52 – 1:22:53
You mustn't forget that either.
|
|
|
1:22:53 – 1:22:56
It was unplanned, unplanned.
|
|
|
1:22:56 – 1:22:57
That was spontaneous.
|
|
|
1:22:57 – 1:23:00
Or do you think we planned for him to give us ten roses?
|
|
|
1:23:00 – 1:23:03
Excuse me, Sascha sends ten roses.
|
|
|
1:23:03 – 1:23:09
Well, let's talk about this incredible effort,
|
|
|
1:23:09 – 1:23:13
It is worth the equivalent of five cents.
|
|
|
1:23:14 – 1:23:21
Exactly. Guys, seriously. There was no script, no script.
|
|
|
1:23:21 – 1:23:27
You spontaneously have someone in the livestream with whom you have never spoken before.
|
|
|
1:23:27 – 1:23:35
And then this is also someone you see critically and also classify and thematize,
|
|
|
1:23:35 – 1:23:40
with which you are almost "official" in the beef.
|
|
|
1:23:40 – 1:23:50
Don't you think, if there are also viewers in there and questions are asked, that you don't have such an inner tension as a content creator?
|
|
|
1:23:50 – 1:23:59
Because the questions are there too. So not that you were afraid, I don't want to say that, but you think three times exactly what you say.
|
|
|
1:23:59 – 1:24:07
Because if you say something wrong, for example, the next lawsuit may flutter into the house.
|
|
|
1:24:07 – 1:24:12
You might get a lock on TikTok because you violate the guidelines.
|
|
|
1:24:12 – 1:24:17
Or you kick someone else on the tie.
|
|
|
1:24:17 – 1:24:24
You have to be in a live situation, because you can't cut out a statement you made if it was stupid.
|
|
|
1:24:24 – 1:24:31
Here at the podcast, there are so many promises that are cut out, others we leave in.
|
|
|
1:24:31 – 1:24:35
You don't get that because things are cut out.
|
|
|
1:24:35 – 1:24:40
But you can't do that in the livestream. What was said was said.
|
|
|
1:24:40 – 1:24:42
And you can't change that either.
|
|
|
1:24:42 – 1:24:48
Yes and most importantly, there are enough people doing screen recordings, screenshots.
|
|
|
1:24:48 – 1:24:53
Didn't you see? And then it's conserved for eternity anyway.
|
|
|
1:24:53 – 1:24:54
That's right.
|
|
|
1:24:54 – 1:24:55
So from there.
|
|
|
1:24:55 – 1:25:00
Yes, so we got criticism because we were too friendly.
|
|
|
1:25:00 – 1:25:08
We got criticism because we didn't disclose things we can't disclose.
|
|
|
1:25:08 – 1:25:10
And I'm allowed to.
|
|
|
1:25:10 – 1:25:19
That's right. And because we haven't stepped in far enough for Lexi, what else should we have said,
|
|
|
1:25:19 – 1:25:27
without violating personal rights or anything like that by any people, either Frank or Lexi.
|
|
|
1:25:27 – 1:25:34
By simply, without asking, because we were in a livestream that wasn't planned,
|
|
|
1:25:34 – 1:25:37
Get some information out.
|
|
|
1:25:37 – 1:25:42
We have now taken a quasi-position.
|
|
|
1:25:42 – 1:25:50
The story that happened there that was with Lexi and Frank, who was officially known
|
|
|
1:25:50 – 1:25:54
And for some it's a term, and for others it's not, it's terrible.
|
|
|
1:25:54 – 1:25:56
We're behind Lexi.
|
|
|
1:25:56 – 1:26:04
Also in general, as far as this issue with this case is concerned, we stand behind Lexi.
|
|
|
1:26:04 – 1:26:12
We want to say that again, but we can't do anything like that in a live situation.
|
|
|
1:26:12 – 1:26:20
You have to understand us, too. Imagine you're in our position and we can,
|
|
|
1:26:20 – 1:26:28
Even if we can understand the situation, why you get upset, for example, but you must also be able to understand us.
|
|
|
1:26:28 – 1:26:33
We cannot do this because we are legally vulnerable.
|
|
|
1:26:33 – 1:26:40
That's right. And then there's something else we've noticed since the trial in Cologne.
|
|
|
1:26:40 – 1:26:42
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
1:26:42 – 1:26:51
It's only then that we realize how radical some people are.
|
|
|
1:26:51 – 1:26:55
spectators and also creators.
|
|
|
1:26:55 – 1:26:57
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
1:26:57 – 1:27:01
So that one person is already pretty much...
|
|
|
1:27:01 – 1:27:05
Dances in places from the row
|
|
|
1:27:05 – 1:27:10
Excessively exaggerated, we all knew that.
|
|
|
1:27:10 – 1:27:22
But I was shocked at how many of the viewers put it all into perspective.
|
|
|
1:27:22 – 1:27:34
That maybe even, I don't want to say celebrated now, but it didn't feel bad now what happened there.
|
|
|
1:27:34 – 1:27:36
Yes, that's right.
|
|
|
1:27:36 – 1:27:44
And they are also of the opinion that he deserved this, this that, that is, this bodily injury to the detriment of Frank.
|
|
|
1:27:44 – 1:27:55
We were shocked. We are also critics of Frank. We see him critically, we see him controversially. But we hate violence.
|
|
|
1:27:55 – 1:28:00
Yes, and there was just such a concatenation of border crossings.
|
|
|
1:28:00 – 1:28:13
And at some point there was also a point where we also said to ourselves, that was at the latest where there was the bodily injury, that this is now reached a point where you say that this goes so far.
|
|
|
1:28:13 – 1:28:39
We have already commented on this more than once, but I have to say that now I have to be turned on for being accused because we have not reacted radically enough to Frank in the live, which I found really strange.
|
|
|
1:28:39 – 1:28:46
Some people with whom you have had to deal more closely, who may also have spent months at a time.
|
|
|
1:28:46 – 1:28:52
were on our side, where one was in daily exchange and also exchanged about private things,
|
|
|
1:28:52 – 1:29:01
For example, to leave our group and say that the people
|
|
|
1:29:01 – 1:29:07
distance ourselves from us now because we would no longer be authentic, because we were live and not
|
|
|
1:29:07 – 1:29:14
More radically enough. That's a pretty nice slap in the face, you really have to say, because
|
|
|
1:29:14 – 1:29:23
From our side we have always tried to be kind and benevolent to all our
|
|
|
1:29:23 – 1:29:32
To be spectators. Yes, even with some kind of respect. And even if we go here and
|
|
|
1:29:32 – 1:29:36
Sometimes harsh criticism of Frank, who is sometimes extremely over it.
|
|
|
1:29:36 – 1:29:40
Yes, and there are also quite a lot of chubby sayings.
|
|
|
1:29:40 – 1:29:45
I mean, Frank does the same with other people and the same with us.
|
|
|
1:29:45 – 1:29:48
And that's all right.
|
|
|
1:29:48 – 1:29:51
There are always boundaries somewhere.
|
|
|
1:29:51 – 1:29:56
And just because we weren't energetic enough, loud,
|
|
|
1:29:56 – 1:30:07
If you haven't asked hard enough, checked in, then judged like that, I think it's really hard.
|
|
|
1:30:07 – 1:30:16
And that's the point I just meant. Since that incident, I've wondered a few times,
|
|
|
1:30:16 – 1:30:21
This is almost hatred.
|
|
|
1:30:21 – 1:30:27
Yes, I also found this to be on top of many.
|
|
|
1:30:27 – 1:30:32
We have tried again and again to explain the situation and have also said,
|
|
|
1:30:32 – 1:30:38
Imagine that it wasn't Frank, but you were the victim yourself, for example.
|
|
|
1:30:38 – 1:30:46
Or an acquaintance. You can't let a YouTube beef escalate like that.
|
|
|
1:30:46 – 1:30:52
There is no reason, no reason in this world, to physically attack a human being.
|
|
|
1:30:52 – 1:30:56
Yes, and we had, too, Daniel, you had just said that,
|
|
|
1:30:56 – 1:31:00
It's our popo that gets screwed up.
|
|
|
1:31:00 – 1:31:06
Right, we are the ones who have legal consequences when we speak up.
|
|
|
1:31:06 – 1:31:12
We can lose the channel. We can burn a lot of money.
|
|
|
1:31:12 – 1:31:15
It can even have criminal consequences.
|
|
|
1:31:15 – 1:31:23
Yes, but of course people don't care. Most importantly, their interests are enforced.
|
|
|
1:31:23 – 1:31:27
Even with the spectators. And woe, you don't do that as a content creator.
|
|
|
1:31:27 – 1:31:29
Yeah, that's tough.
|
|
|
1:31:29 – 1:31:32
Yes, and they tried to explain themselves.
|
|
|
1:31:32 – 1:31:38
And I'm just disappointed after months of dealing with it.
|
|
|
1:31:38 – 1:31:43
And also these people, I don't care, I won't name them now,
|
|
|
1:31:43 – 1:31:48
But they said they wouldn't go back to Impulsiva.
|
|
|
1:31:48 – 1:31:53
Because on Impulsiva, for example, they were not good to talk about for personal reasons.
|
|
|
1:31:53 – 1:32:00
And now all of a sudden you see these same people under the canal yesterday,
|
|
|
1:32:00 – 1:32:01
And there were several people.
|
|
|
1:32:01 – 1:32:13
I mean, one also knows that these people still have to do with people like Sabrina, also with people from this bubble of hers, where of course you are also instrumentalized.
|
|
|
1:32:13 – 1:32:24
But these people had direct access, which we are now talking about, to go directly into the discourse with us, which they also liked to do for weeks and months.
|
|
|
1:32:24 – 1:32:38
But I want to say it this way, since we also opened the acts of the self-actors and the acts of Lautfunk and just want to look at the whole thing more holistically
|
|
|
1:32:38 – 1:32:55
And then this TikTok livestream, we have now completely disqualified ourselves, because we do not support this collective of hatred against Frank.
|
|
|
1:32:55 – 1:33:03
Yes, above all, I can't go and then hold Frank responsible for all the bad and evil in the world.
|
|
|
1:33:03 – 1:33:07
Frank leaves some scorched earth behind.
|
|
|
1:33:07 – 1:33:13
Frank is controversial, without question, and there is so much to criticize.
|
|
|
1:33:13 – 1:33:17
But somewhere he is also a human being.
|
|
|
1:33:17 – 1:33:24
And then he deserves it, if you are in a live situation, that you humanly deal with them.
|
|
|
1:33:24 – 1:33:30
This also requires that you let them speak out, that you listen to them.
|
|
|
1:33:30 – 1:33:35
Because I expect the same respect from him that he lets me talk out,
|
|
|
1:33:35 – 1:33:43
I want him to listen to what I have to say. And if this is interpreted as not authentic,
|
|
|
1:33:43 – 1:33:50
So what? So I'm also in favour of making our own call to action.
|
|
|
1:33:50 – 1:33:56
A call to action for just these people, that's also the conclusion at the place for us.
|
|
|
1:33:56 – 1:34:06
Yes, if you didn't like what you heard, especially because of the TikTok Live
|
|
|
1:34:06 – 1:34:12
and you therefore consider us no longer authentic, just go and follow us,
|
|
|
1:34:12 – 1:34:18
No more liked, no more commenting, and last but not least, blocking us.
|
|
|
1:34:18 – 1:34:19
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
1:34:19 – 1:34:20
Thank you very much.
|
|
|
1:34:20 – 1:34:25
And if possible on all platforms, then you have nothing to do with us anymore.
|
|
|
1:34:25 – 1:34:34
do. We literally no longer exist. For you, exactly. And now we're probably coming to
|
|
|
1:34:34 – 1:34:45
Probably the most important points at all. Yes, for us. In fact, for selfish reasons. Because
|
|
|
1:34:45 – 1:34:53
This was actually announced in the livestream. So our trial,
|
|
|
1:34:53 – 1:34:58
He was standing between Frank and us, he's off the table.
|
|
|
1:34:58 – 1:35:04
Do we have to be grateful to anyone?
|
|
|
1:35:04 – 1:35:12
Our lawyers because they did a lot of work.
|
|
|
1:35:12 – 1:35:15
Oh, you mean, yeah. That's right.
|
|
|
1:35:15 – 1:35:15
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
1:35:15 – 1:35:21
I gave my lawyer a lot of gratitude.
|
|
|
1:35:21 – 1:35:35
Yes, I actually fell a stone from my heart, after then also an e-mail today
|
|
|
1:35:35 – 1:35:44
It was written in which it was written. And yes, that's a chapter I'm holding
|
|
|
1:35:44 – 1:35:49
I really don't need it again.
|
|
|
1:35:49 – 1:35:52
I don't need that either. It cost a lot of money,
|
|
|
1:35:52 – 1:35:57
Lots of nerves.
|
|
|
1:35:57 – 1:36:00
It must also be said that it has left no trace on us,
|
|
|
1:36:00 – 1:36:08
Because you're worried and worried.
|
|
|
1:36:08 – 1:36:14
Worries that are not only financial in nature, but you may also start
|
|
|
1:36:14 – 1:36:20
To question a bit. Yes, and then come such thoughts as logistical nature,
|
|
|
1:36:20 – 1:36:26
If he actually has to go to court in Cologne, how do I organize it, how do I do it?
|
|
|
1:36:26 – 1:36:34
Especially if you are traveling with a wheelchair or a rollator, stop
|
|
|
1:36:34 – 1:36:39
Everything is not so easy and then you are happy when the thing is eaten.
|
|
|
1:36:39 – 1:36:47
Exactly, especially since you have to think about unpleasant things especially in Cologne.
|
|
|
1:36:47 – 1:36:51
Meetings in front of the courthouse. That's all I want to say.
|
|
|
1:36:51 – 1:36:53
Yes, this is …
|
|
|
1:36:53 – 1:36:55
That could happen.
|
|
|
1:36:55 – 1:36:57
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
1:36:57 – 1:37:04
And these are things … You're just happy when you're under less stress and I think
|
|
|
1:37:04 – 1:37:10
This is also the case with Frank. Because it cost Frank money and nerves.
|
|
|
1:37:10 – 1:37:13
You can assume that.
|
|
|
1:37:13 – 1:37:19
Yes, and in the end, it's good that it's just done.
|
|
|
1:37:19 – 1:37:19
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
1:37:19 – 1:37:29
Yes, and hopefully there will be no more trials or so.
|
|
|
1:37:29 – 1:37:40
I knock on wood. Knock, knock, knock, knock. Yes, yes. Well, somehow it was now, wasn't it? Yes, yes.
|
|
|
1:37:40 – 1:37:49
It's hard, isn't it? Yes, now I definitely need a little break,
|
|
|
1:37:49 – 1:37:53
before we upload the next episode.
|
|
|
1:37:53 – 1:38:02
It's been a busy week and let's see what the future holds.
|
|
|
1:38:02 – 1:38:04
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:38:04 – 1:38:13
In this sense, I would say goodbye, until next time, thank you for listening and had you well.
|
|
|
1:38:13 – 1:38:15
Goodbye folks.
|
|
|
1:38:15 – 1:38:17
with Rectal Digital
|
|
|
1:38:17 – 1:38:20
The Flattermann file
|
|
|
1:38:20 – 1:38:25
Today it fluttered neatly in the digital chicken coop again
|
|
|
1:38:25 – 1:38:29
Deleted comments, sudden cheering storms from the wrong corner
|
|
|
1:38:29 – 1:38:34
Jotter in the breakfast club at operating temperature
|
|
|
1:38:34 – 1:38:40
And a new journalist with a catalogue of questions, press card, fantasy
|
|
|
1:38:40 – 1:38:45
and a lot of mission awareness at the most underground level.
|
|
|
1:38:45 – 1:38:52
In addition, there were shallow jokes, shallow jerks, anacondas and a spontaneous TikTok livestream,
|
|
|
1:38:52 – 1:38:55
Suddenly Frank Höchst was sitting in person.
|
|
|
1:38:55 – 1:39:00
And behold, you can see someone critically and still talk to them objectively.
|
|
|
1:39:00 – 1:39:07
For some, apparently a greater mystery than working Wi-Fi in the live stream.
|
|
|
1:39:07 – 1:39:10
And to all who support us,
|
|
|
1:39:10 – 1:39:13
As long as we flutter exactly to her nose,
|
|
|
1:39:13 – 1:39:14
Do it well!
|
|
|
1:39:14 – 1:39:17
Rektal Digital is not a rental megaphone
|
|
|
1:39:17 – 1:39:21
for foreign revenge fantasies.
|
|
|
1:39:21 – 1:39:22
We remain at the edge of criticism
|
|
|
1:39:22 – 1:39:25
and loss of control with source situation.
|
|
|
1:39:25 – 1:39:28
So listen again next time
|
|
|
1:39:28 – 1:39:31
Rectally digital.
|
|
|
1:39:31 – 1:39:33
The file's fluttering, man.
|
|
|
1:39:33 – 1:39:41
[Music]
|
In this edition of Rektal Digital – The Flattermann file It becomes unusual: Sascha and Sarah talk about parasocial dynamics, deleted comments, sudden sympathies from unexpected directions and why criticism is often only accepted when it meets the ‘right’ people.
This time, the focus will be on several themes: Jutta’s performance in the breakfast club, Impulsiva’s catalogue of questions to Frank, the question of journalistic ambition versus personal campaign and, of course, the ‘Flattermann of the Week’. In addition, Sascha and Sarah talk about their spontaneous TikTok livestream, in which Frank suddenly appeared himself – including roses, conversation, critical inquiries and the irritated reactions afterwards.
This is not only about beef, but also about responsibility: What can be discussed publicly? Where does doxing begin? Why are private screenshots not free tickets for public screenings? And why doesn't criticism automatically mean that you can't still talk to each other objectively?
A consequence about loss of control, double standards, community expectations, parasocial protective reflexes and the question why some people only celebrate criticism when they do not meet their own darling.
Thematic breakdown:
1. Welcome and entry into the file Flattermann
Sascha and Sarah open the episode, making the call-to-action and announcing that this time the ‘housemaking’ is divided into two parts.
2. Review of the last episode and sudden approval from an unexpected corner
It's about people who have previously criticized Rektal Digital suddenly showing approval as soon as it's not Frank who is at the center of the criticism, but other content creators.
3. Parasocial Dynamics and Selective Criticism
Sascha and Sarah talk about why criticism is evaluated differently depending on the target person: If your favourite creator is criticised, it is ‘hate’ – if it hits others, it is suddenly ‘brave’ and ‘right’.
4. Deleted comments by Bernie and Boris
Benevolent comments appeared under the last episode, which disappeared a short time later. This raises the question of whether there was real self-reflection in the game or just a quick comment from false expectation.
5. Jutta at the breakfast club: except margin and band
In the breakfast club from 06.05.2026, a caller named Sarah is addressed, who asks Frank critical questions. Jutta intervenes loudly, falls into the word and partially takes over the conversation.
6. Jutta's role as a shield for Frank
Sascha and Sarah analyse how Jutta defends Frank over and over again, almost standing in front of him like a protective body, even though Frank is quite capable of defending himself.
7. The question: Does Jutta actually do the format well?
It is discussed whether Jutta's presence strengthens the breakfast club or rather makes it more difficult, because she partially attracts the format due to her nature.
8. Impulsiva as a ‘new journalist’ and the press card fantasy
The topic changes to Impulsiva, her journalistic self-image and the idea of a press card. It is critically assessed what journalistic work actually means: Research, evidence, sources and clean separation of opinion and report.
9. The Question Catalog for Frank
Impulsiva has created a four-page questionnaire for Frank. Sascha and Sarah take up three central questions from this: Contradictions in Frank's presentation, the handling of donations and the question of a clear statement without distraction.
10. Criticism or control over the narrative?
The catalogue of questions is seen not only as an educational tool, but also as an attempt to maintain control over the public narrative. Impulsiva's long-standing fixation on Frank is viewed critically.
11. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
It's about changing alliances: Lawan, Gravalenta, Giulia and others are placed in the context of conflicts with Frank. As soon as someone has stress with Frank, he or she suddenly becomes interesting or welcome.
12. Upside-down questionnaire to Impulsiva
Sascha and Sarah turn the tables mentally and ask what questions you should actually ask Impulsiva: When did criticism become hatred? Why this year-long fixation? And why is one's own criticism hardly reflected?
13. Frank and reading articles
Frank reads newspaper articles in his formats, for example on current topics such as Fabian or the stranded whale. Positively, it is mentioned that sources are mentioned at least verbally, but critically, that they also belong in show notes or video descriptions.
14. Clickbait, True Crime Bubble and Theme Exploitation
It is arranged why topics such as the case of Fabian or the whale are so strongly taken up: They generate attention, reach and clicks, even for people who have previously made fun of other content creators.
15. The Flatterman of the Week
The humorous block is dedicated to promises, flat jokes, ‘flat wanks’, anacondas and old-white man humour. The typical dynamic between Frank and Christine is taken up.
16. The second part of home-making: The Spontaneous TikTok Livestream
Sascha and Sarah talk about their spontaneous TikTok livestream, which was supposed to be just a casual nostalgia live.
17. Frank appears in the livestream
Unexpectedly, Frank watches, sends roses and is finally brought into the live stream. This results in a longer conversation that is surprisingly objective and calm.
18. Conversation with Frank: Donations, debts and critical issues
The livestream addresses issues such as GoFundMe donations, transparency, debt to Lexi and Frank's view of various allegations.
19. Community Reactions to the Conversation
Some viewers like the fact that a factual exchange was possible. Others react disappointed because they expected Sascha and Sarah to appear harder, louder or more confrontational.
20. Why private screenshots are not publicly exploited
Sascha and Sarah clearly explain why they don't use private screenshots, emails or non-verifiable content publicly: Data protection, personal rights and legal risks.
21. Delimitation of foreign revenge fantasies
It is made clear that Rektal Digital is not a rental megaphone for others. Anyone who wants to make private information public should take responsibility for it himself.
22. Conclusion: Criticism yes, double standards no
The end result is the attitude: Criticism remains permissible and necessary, but not on call, not as a doxing tool and not as a vicarious agent of foreign indignation. The basis is the transcript of the uploaded sequence.
Links to the issue:
Advertising:
Related episodes:
- The TV Chest
- The file Flattermann 1
- The Flattermann 2 file
- The file Flattermann 3 - YouTube hate escalates: Threat of Murder and Intrigue
- The Flattermann 4 file between victim role and trash content
- Between foreign shame, reproaches and spiritual immature
- H2O2 & LautFunk: An unexpected conversation with Lina
- Creator Myth vs. Community Reality
- The Flattermann 8 file – The staged martyr
- The Flattermann 9 file - Thoughts under snow - Between community, criticism and reality
- The file Flattermann 10 – Knallt's or Flattert's already? – New Year's Eve special
- The Flattermann 11 file – The self-chosen decay in megalomania!
- The Flattermann 12 file - satire, stripping and false arguments
- The file Flattermann 13 - between stage and sensitivities
- The file LautFunk 1 - Impulsiva powder barrel
- The Acts of the Self-Performers - The Underpants Gate and how deep do you want to sink for clicks?
Contributors to this episode
Sarah
Sascha
Playing time: 1:39:41
Date of admission: 07.05.26
This episode is from season 4, there are a total of 4 seasons.
One According to Funk Publication Cartel Production - Where stories are transmitted unmistakably.
Podcast license:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Note: This post contains affiliate links. If you shop through these links, I'll get a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Related posts
Discover more from LautFunk Podcast & Blog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Author: Sascha Markmann
Sascha Markmann is a creative mind with a moving biography – and a person who has rediscovered life after a stroke. After working as a paramedic and elderly caregiver, Sascha found his way into creative expression. As a blogger, podcaster, musician and visual storyteller, he brings together things that just don't fit at first glance: He combines his keen enthusiasm for technology – from self-hosted servers to electronic music production – with emotional depth and an oblique sense of humor. His contributions are somewhere between borderline, acid basslines and assistance – honestly, directly and with a wink. Guiding principle: “Audio-visual dullness with no usefulness – but perhaps that's why it's so valuable.” View all posts by Sascha Markmann
English