| transcript | |
|---|---|
|
00:00 - 0:00:03
*Mobile phone rings*
|
|
|
0:00:03 – 0:00:04
Hehehe, hello!
|
|
|
0:00:04 – 0:00:04
Hello there!
|
|
|
0:00:04 – 0:00:06
Welcome to Uncensored and Outrageous!
|
|
|
0:00:06 – 0:00:09
*Mobile phone rings*
|
|
|
0:00:09 – 0:00:10
So, so, cell phone away!
|
|
|
0:00:10 – 0:00:12
Now someone is being publicly dismantled again!
|
|
|
0:00:12 – 0:00:14
*Mobile phone rings*
|
|
|
0:00:14 – 0:00:16
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
0:00:16 – 0:00:18
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
0:00:18 – 0:00:22
Not brave, not uncomfortable, just old hatred in the livestream system!
|
|
|
0:00:22 – 0:00:24
*Mobile phone rings*
|
|
|
0:00:24 – 0:00:27
Uncensored and outrageous? No, it's obsessive!
|
|
|
0:00:27 – 0:00:30
If it's going to be despite and perpetual loop, you call it discussion
|
|
|
0:00:30 – 0:00:31
It's a discussion
|
|
|
0:00:57 – 0:00:59
*Music*
|
|
|
0:00:59 – 0:01:06
[Music]
|
|
|
0:01:06 – 0:01:11
[Music]
|
|
|
0:01:11 – 0:01:14
[Music]
|
|
|
0:01:14 – 0:01:17
[Music]
|
|
|
0:01:17 – 0:01:20
[Music]
|
|
|
0:01:20 – 0:01:23
[Music]
|
|
|
0:01:23 – 0:01:26
[Music]
|
|
|
0:01:26 – 0:01:37
Yes, welcome to Rektal Digital.
|
|
|
0:01:37 – 0:01:40
The acts of the self-actors.
|
|
|
0:01:40 – 0:01:43
Wow, that's about time again, isn't it?
|
|
|
0:01:43 – 0:01:47
Yes, hello Sascha.
|
|
|
0:01:47 – 0:01:50
Hi Sarah, how are you?
|
|
|
0:01:50 – 0:01:52
Good and you?
|
|
|
0:01:52 – 0:01:59
Oh, wonderful, Mellagrippe is finally over. I mean, you know that yourself, you've got me well
|
|
|
0:01:59 – 0:02:07
Well maintained and now everything is wonderful again. And more importantly, hello Leon.
|
|
|
0:02:07 – 0:02:15
Hello Sarah and Sascha. Hello there. Glad it worked out with the appointment today.
|
|
|
0:02:15 – 0:02:25
Yeah, I'm really happy. Oh man! Today you actually get your own episode with us. Can
|
|
|
0:02:25 – 0:02:34
Imagine that? I think Mega is, really. So I never would have thought. In any case, thank you,
|
|
|
0:02:34 – 0:02:39
that you're here and then we'll tell you the story that interests so many,
|
|
|
0:02:39 – 0:02:47
between Talnews and the Lavan theme and also a bit more impulsive. We will
|
|
|
0:02:47 – 0:02:54
Talk about other topics together as well. Yes, there is a lot about this subject.
|
|
|
0:02:54 – 0:03:01
Lavan and so happens and there you have to stop for a short time or even times one or the other
|
|
|
0:03:01 – 0:03:08
Content creators are mentioned. If I had said, we'll start when you're ready.
|
|
|
0:03:08 – 0:03:10
Yes, yes. Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:03:10 – 0:03:12
Okay.
|
|
|
0:03:12 – 0:03:17
There's a lot to talk about. Yes, and I believe a lot about
|
|
|
0:03:17 – 0:03:21
correct. That's true. There are many
|
|
|
0:03:21 – 0:03:29
False information came to light. Yes, I would have said, let's start
|
|
|
0:03:29 – 0:03:39
Let's start with the beginning of the story. LaVan has become known in the last few months as a result of
|
|
|
0:03:39 – 0:03:44
It was such a scandal when it came to animal welfare.
|
|
|
0:03:44 – 0:03:46
He has almost exposted himself.
|
|
|
0:03:46 – 0:03:51
By talking about it publicly.
|
|
|
0:03:51 – 0:03:52
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
0:03:52 – 0:03:58
And then various content creators had reacted to it, including the
|
|
|
0:03:58 – 0:04:10
TV Chest, then Impulsiva with "Uncensored and outrageous" and stop Sam, the former
|
|
|
0:04:10 – 0:04:23
Moderator of Impulsiva and Frank. There were one, two, three videos.
|
|
|
0:04:23 – 0:04:32
And live streams, which were then suddenly deleted and a huge beef, until then stops
|
|
|
0:04:32 – 0:04:41
And then Talnews came along. That's true. We have our research
|
|
|
0:04:41 – 0:04:48
As far as the cat issue is concerned, we have come across a lot of new things.
|
|
|
0:04:48 – 0:04:53
Of course, things that were public, but we wanted to know more.
|
|
|
0:04:53 – 0:05:03
And there's just someone from us went to the named address, which she didxed
|
|
|
0:05:03 – 0:05:11
at snouts.de and the address was then checked. The one who went there,
|
|
|
0:05:11 – 0:05:21
I didn't know what person it was about or what topic it was about. He was just going there,
|
|
|
0:05:21 – 0:05:29
Check the address and leave. Of course, this person also has three pictures
|
|
|
0:05:29 – 0:05:35
It was published later, but it was not published until later.
|
|
|
0:05:35 – 0:05:44
So that means that the person almost went to the address, just like I said, took photos,
|
|
|
0:05:44 – 0:05:49
I didn't even know why she was going there, except to check the address.
|
|
|
0:05:49 – 0:06:00
So the person didn't know that you and your team were doing research in this story, so to speak.
|
|
|
0:06:00 – 0:06:14
Lavan technology, with animal welfare and all that. Exactly. Okay, before the man, let me tell you,
|
|
|
0:06:14 – 0:06:20
Did you get in touch with Lavant before?
|
|
|
0:06:20 – 0:06:27
No. Okay. So you didn't send a questionnaire, did you?
|
|
|
0:06:27 – 0:06:36
At the time, no, the questionnaire was not published until after the check at 5.30 p.m. on the
|
|
|
0:06:36 – 0:06:45
said day, I mean that would have been the 16.03., 2025, at 17.30 o'clock was then per
|
|
|
0:06:45 – 0:06:54
WhatsApp sends the questionnaire. And then came a relatively fast call from the young
|
|
|
0:06:54 – 0:07:03
and I didn't even see it because I was in Wuppertal at my regular work
|
|
|
0:07:03 – 0:07:09
I asked my boss if I could talk on the phone for five minutes. I have a
|
|
|
0:07:09 – 0:07:16
I've called a person five times. Oh, five times? - Exactly. And you didn't answer a call?
|
|
|
0:07:16 – 0:07:26
Or something like that. Yes, actually. Okay. But she didn't leave a message? No. Okay,
|
|
|
0:07:26 – 0:07:32
I would have a question at this point. Is there really a reason why you can use WhatsApp?
|
|
|
0:07:32 – 0:07:37
contacted and not by e-mail or by imprint or something like that, which is usual
|
|
|
0:07:37 – 0:07:45
Is it on YouTubers? She didn't go to the pressum because she doesn't have one at all as a YouTuber and
|
|
|
0:07:45 – 0:07:53
via mobile phone number I could only reach them via Whatsapp, because they do not have an e-mail address online
|
|
|
0:07:53 – 0:08:01
has. Okay and may I ask, the mobile phone number of LaVar, you have the then also online research
|
|
|
0:08:01 – 0:08:07
Can you do the same as the address?
|
|
|
0:08:07 – 0:08:14
Exactly, they can be viewed online
|
|
|
0:08:14 – 0:08:15
in an advertising world of animals and there have
|
|
|
0:08:15 – 0:08:20
I got this, and then I checked it out.
|
|
|
0:08:20 – 0:08:22
leave. All right, listeners, now
|
|
|
0:08:22 – 0:08:26
do you know how the Leon to the data
|
|
|
0:08:26 – 0:08:29
How it came about and how to contact
|
|
|
0:08:26 – 0:08:33
has taken place. So, we learn there's someone going to check if LaVan lives there.
|
|
|
0:08:33 – 0:08:41
Pictures were taken and then the questionnaire was sent to LaVan via WhatsApp.
|
|
|
0:08:41 – 0:08:47
Now let's ask, what was the content of the questionnaire? You don't have to do everything now
|
|
|
0:08:47 – 0:08:54
Let me tell you a little bit about the questions you asked LaVan.
|
|
|
0:08:54 – 0:08:58
I have to say that it was 14 pages.
|
|
|
0:08:58 – 0:09:05
It was 14 pages. But there were also seven pages of pictures that we attached.
|
|
|
0:09:05 – 0:09:12
The pictures from the ad, where their address could also be found.
|
|
|
0:09:12 – 0:09:18
And that's how the catalogue of questions is structured, you can imagine it,
|
|
|
0:09:18 – 0:09:21
It's like getting a letter from a lawyer.
|
|
|
0:09:21 – 0:09:24
Only that I or Thalnüs is not a lawyer,
|
|
|
0:09:24 – 0:09:26
You have to be very clear here.
|
|
|
0:09:26 – 0:09:29
The scripture is relatively large,
|
|
|
0:09:29 – 0:09:31
with a lot of line spacing,
|
|
|
0:09:31 – 0:09:33
Today in block style.
|
|
|
0:09:33 – 0:09:37
And the question was first,
|
|
|
0:09:37 – 0:09:43
How are the kittens kept?
|
|
|
0:09:43 – 0:09:46
How are the kittens cared for?
|
|
|
0:09:46 – 0:09:50
Veterinarians are vaccinated.
|
|
|
0:09:50 – 0:09:57
There is information that cats themselves have been illegally tampered with,
|
|
|
0:09:57 – 0:10:04
that the veterinarian or a veterinarian from Duisburg or Oberhausen
|
|
|
0:10:04 – 0:10:11
She was involved and the Go gave her the ability to chip there.
|
|
|
0:10:11 – 0:10:21
And it is also supposed to have been according to the first findings, the apartments were very littered.
|
|
|
0:10:21 – 0:10:26
That was the core of the questionnaire.
|
|
|
0:10:26 – 0:10:31
One has to say that Serafon has told a lot of things himself in live streams.
|
|
|
0:10:31 – 0:10:36
Also the story with the vet and the shepherds,
|
|
|
0:10:36 – 0:10:40
Then he builds an incubator and stuff like that.
|
|
|
0:10:40 – 0:10:48
Yeah, that's right. That was also content. At the beginning, we really imagined what we were doing.
|
|
|
0:10:48 – 0:10:57
That despite research, we contact them via WhatsApp to uncover possible grievances.
|
|
|
0:10:57 – 0:11:03
That we give her time as a partisan, as an editor. We set a time window.
|
|
|
0:11:03 – 0:11:08
That was Friday, March 20.
|
|
|
0:11:08 – 0:11:12
At 12 o'clock, please answer the questions.
|
|
|
0:11:12 – 0:11:16
And that we also have this checked by the legal department,
|
|
|
0:11:16 – 0:11:20
whether there are non-criminal matters.
|
|
|
0:11:20 – 0:11:26
And then it went on with cat population, accusations and mediation,
|
|
|
0:11:26 – 0:11:31
how it works so that she only had so many cats,
|
|
|
0:11:31 – 0:11:37
So many that she didn't get so many from the Oberhausen Animal Welfare Association.
|
|
|
0:11:37 – 0:11:43
This became clear only when we got in touch with the Animal Welfare Association Oberhausen.
|
|
|
0:11:43 – 0:11:51
have set. And then it goes on with nursing job status. To which animal welfare association
|
|
|
0:11:51 – 0:11:57
Does it belong? Is it now in Oberhausen or Tierschutzverein Duisburg? How are they
|
|
|
0:11:57 – 0:12:05
For example, when was the last time there was a check. And then we come stop
|
|
|
0:12:05 – 0:12:14
On the subject of chipping and castration. And there's really going out, she's got it herself too
|
|
|
0:12:14 – 0:12:21
Confirms in YouTube videos and live streams that she chipped cats with the vet's go
|
|
|
0:12:21 – 0:12:31
in Oberhausen. And we have just mentioned clear structures that they are also publicly available.
|
|
|
0:12:31 – 0:12:39
has often said to other creators how much she has in stock of cats,
|
|
|
0:12:39 – 0:12:45
They also sell it for $500. And then we asked, okay,
|
|
|
0:12:45 – 0:12:55
Donations, cash flows, how does that work? You have to be very clear when you have an animal.
|
|
|
0:12:55 – 0:13:03
sold for 500 euros and then an ups-litter, so an unwanted litter arises, okay, that can sometimes
|
|
|
0:13:03 – 0:13:11
happen. But with the good lady, with Lavan, it has happened quite often. And there was also
|
|
|
0:13:11 – 0:13:16
Research that our impulsive delusion has done with the Zerm.
|
|
|
0:13:16 – 0:13:24
Yes, you have to say yes, she had her cat neutered and actually immediately
|
|
|
0:13:24 – 0:13:31
Let the cats and the cats come together again and then it's just this ups accident
|
|
|
0:13:31 – 0:13:32
It's happening.
|
|
|
0:13:32 – 0:13:50
But you also have to say that LaVan has always contradicted himself in the videos with the different creators and has always told different versions of the same content.
|
|
|
0:13:50 – 0:13:51
Yes, that's true.
|
|
|
0:13:51 – 0:14:00
While she told the one content creator that she chipped the cats, according to my memory log,
|
|
|
0:14:00 – 0:14:06
with the knowledge of the veterinarian, in quotation marks with consultation,
|
|
|
0:14:06 – 0:14:15
Then again, she said yes to other content creators, no, no, that wasn't the case.
|
|
|
0:14:15 – 0:14:28
She would have done this on her own and would have informed the veterinarian afterwards and he would not have been enthusiastic about it.
|
|
|
0:14:28 – 0:14:43
Now one wonders, of course, if a person tells different versions of the same thing over and over again and hassles about the information that he reveals,
|
|
|
0:14:43 – 0:14:48
Ask yourself, where is the truth of your statements?
|
|
|
0:14:48 – 0:14:56
And that's why I think it's good that you also go as a press and then critically question,
|
|
|
0:14:56 – 0:15:02
because it is ultimately about animal welfare, especially if, as Lavanya claims,
|
|
|
0:15:02 – 0:15:04
Stand up for animal welfare.
|
|
|
0:15:04 – 0:15:12
I still have something in the catalogue of questions and it was then about patents, trademarks and public appearance.
|
|
|
0:15:12 – 0:15:21
After all, Laran said that she had given her something to protect, that she had registered a trade mark.
|
|
|
0:15:21 – 0:15:32
And that was invalidated by making a request and making it very clear that the trademark is not registered.
|
|
|
0:15:32 – 0:15:44
Then she offered an open consultation for cat keeping, cat education, cat care and cat health.
|
|
|
0:15:44 – 0:15:49
Then we asked ourselves the questions, what expertise does she have at all?
|
|
|
0:15:49 – 0:15:57
There should also have been questions about sedation and about the Rastrationsmanagement
|
|
|
0:15:57 – 0:16:02
and hygiene especially in the environment where the cats live.
|
|
|
0:16:02 – 0:16:08
And then we finally said that it's not a threat,
|
|
|
0:16:08 – 0:16:13
It's all about journalism, which is about enlightenment.
|
|
|
0:16:13 – 0:16:18
and that we really want to check in a transparent way what happened there,
|
|
|
0:16:18 – 0:16:21
that she can comment on it.
|
|
|
0:16:21 – 0:16:24
Because you have to make a clear distinction here again.
|
|
|
0:16:25 – 0:16:29
She justified herself on YouTube Creators.
|
|
|
0:16:29 – 0:16:35
And they do something completely different than an editor.
|
|
|
0:16:35 – 0:16:37
They're very different.
|
|
|
0:16:37 – 0:16:44
And we have again suggested to her that she should not forward this catalogue of questions.
|
|
|
0:16:44 – 0:16:51
In retrospect, we also had to learn that this unfortunately happened.
|
|
|
0:16:51 – 0:16:59
That's why there will definitely still be investigations in this regard.
|
|
|
0:16:59 – 0:17:07
That's perfectly true. Content may not be passed on,
|
|
|
0:17:07 – 0:17:12
If you explicitly say that this content should not be passed on.
|
|
|
0:17:12 – 0:17:17
But we have generally had the experience in the past,
|
|
|
0:17:17 – 0:17:27
A lot of content creators and users don't stick to it.
|
|
|
0:17:27 – 0:17:32
One time or another we have that, yes.
|
|
|
0:17:32 – 0:17:40
Yes, yes. How did the whole thing go on? So you sent LaVan this questionnaire.
|
|
|
0:17:40 – 0:17:48
I tried to call you five times when you were at work. How did it go on then?
|
|
|
0:17:48 – 0:17:55
I then called her back and made it clear to her that we were doing a research there.
|
|
|
0:17:55 – 0:18:02
They have been hired and will also be published. But on their statement, on the questions,
|
|
|
0:18:02 – 0:18:08
We have to wait until we publish something. And then she said,
|
|
|
0:18:08 – 0:18:13
Yes, but it's not possible, it wasn't like that.
|
|
|
0:18:13 – 0:18:16
And I once told her that she could speak up.
|
|
|
0:18:16 – 0:18:21
And she didn't want to realize that at first,
|
|
|
0:18:21 – 0:18:25
that we, as editors, as press, have become aware of it
|
|
|
0:18:25 – 0:18:27
They did the research themselves.
|
|
|
0:18:27 – 0:18:33
And then I gave her the tip,
|
|
|
0:18:33 – 0:18:34
'Cause I talked to her on the phone,
|
|
|
0:18:34 – 0:18:41
that she should be careful to disclose her data on the Internet alone,
|
|
|
0:18:41 – 0:18:50
as well as in a YouTube live or YouTube video to appear publicly and untruths to
|
|
|
0:18:50 – 0:18:57
spread and get involved in something, that you please just there
|
|
|
0:18:57 – 0:19:03
should take a step back. And then she said yes, I'll think about it
|
|
|
0:19:03 – 0:19:14
and she would contact me. And then the phone call ended. And another
|
|
|
0:19:14 – 0:19:19
Addition. We told her, so I personally, told her there was someone on site, got the address
|
|
|
0:19:19 – 0:19:33
He confirmed and took pictures. Then that was a back and forth and then sent it to me via WhatsApp
|
|
|
0:19:33 – 0:19:43
a message, so at about 9 p.m. that she presents it to her lawyer that she is currently
|
|
|
0:19:43 – 0:19:52
It doesn't look like Messi's apartment at all, that's another impression that she's just one of them.
|
|
|
0:19:52 – 0:20:01
It would be a voluntary animal shelter and that it would not treat the animals like dirt. And they
|
|
|
0:20:01 – 0:20:06
Would definitely report this and hand it over to her lawyer. Then a dry one came from me.
|
|
|
0:20:06 – 0:20:12
Message, okay, it would be easier to answer a question. I can read a question,
|
|
|
0:20:12 – 0:20:22
if they have chipped cats or kittens themselves. Where did they get the chips and what kind of
|
|
|
0:20:22 – 0:20:28
Document from the doctor or animal welfare association Oberhausen confirming that they have
|
|
|
0:20:28 – 0:20:36
Were they allowed? That would have been a simple question that she could have answered. And then came,
|
|
|
0:20:36 – 0:20:44
that she no longer expresses herself in public and that she still has a nice
|
|
|
0:20:44 – 0:20:48
Evening wishes and that she then has to take care of her children.
|
|
|
0:20:48 – 0:20:56
And then I made her believe again that she thinks I misunderstand, because
|
|
|
0:20:56 – 0:21:01
At the time, I put a text online and it's about data protection.
|
|
|
0:21:01 – 0:21:12
Because the television chest of Frank has published Shads of Impulsiva and Lavan.
|
|
|
0:21:12 – 0:21:16
That's right, yes. I still remember that.
|
|
|
0:21:16 – 0:21:25
And then we wrote an article about this data protection scandal and she pleaded for it.
|
|
|
0:21:25 – 0:21:31
He said it wasn't true, more or less.
|
|
|
0:21:31 – 0:21:36
Yeah, and then she blocked me, I blocked her too
|
|
|
0:21:36 – 0:21:43
And then I got a call all of a sudden early in the morning the next day.
|
|
|
0:21:43 – 0:21:47
I didn't hear it because I was in a meeting.
|
|
|
0:21:47 – 0:21:51
And then I called the number back.
|
|
|
0:21:51 – 0:21:55
And then there was a man from the criminal police.
|
|
|
0:21:55 – 0:22:00
Then he asked, am I talking to Mr. Wagemann?
|
|
|
0:22:00 – 0:22:02
I mean, yes, of course, what's going on?
|
|
|
0:22:02 – 0:22:07
Yes, the Lawan would have been here and wanted to stop an ad.
|
|
|
0:22:07 – 0:22:13
And why I sent her a catalogue of questions.
|
|
|
0:22:13 – 0:22:20
And then I told the police commissioner, yes, we are an editorial office and editorial offices act like this,
|
|
|
0:22:20 – 0:22:31
that before we publish something, the persons concerned, the accused offer the opportunity to ask questions or also to express themselves,
|
|
|
0:22:31 – 0:22:36
If you think the public misunderstands something.
|
|
|
0:22:36 – 0:22:46
And he said very clearly that I could not file a complaint because there was nothing criminally relevant here.
|
|
|
0:22:46 – 0:22:56
And that ended the phone call and I thought, okay, then we can keep researching and we can keep going.
|
|
|
0:22:56 – 0:23:06
Okay, so LaVan tried to report you, or the editors Thal News to the police,
|
|
|
0:23:06 – 0:23:12
However, it was found that there was nothing criminally relevant.
|
|
|
0:23:12 – 0:23:23
My question about this, has she ever told you publicly that she was trying to report you, but the report hasn't been recorded?
|
|
|
0:23:23 – 0:23:25
Just for that reason?
|
|
|
0:23:25 – 0:23:38
I can't say whether she played it in a livestream or not, because the good lady, Lavan, does a livestream or deletes it immediately afterwards.
|
|
|
0:23:38 – 0:23:40
Yeah, she does.
|
|
|
0:23:40 – 0:23:47
And just to cover things up, I say now, or not to understand that they are these
|
|
|
0:23:47 – 0:23:52
I've said things, so I can't confirm if she's doing that in any live time.
|
|
|
0:23:52 – 0:24:01
reproduced. All right, but dear listeners, you already hear how the previous procedure
|
|
|
0:24:01 – 0:24:11
He was a lawant. And what happened after that? After that, nothing happened at all. In other words:
|
|
|
0:24:11 – 0:24:17
We did some more research and one day I went to the
|
|
|
0:24:17 – 0:24:25
Editor, open the mailbox and what do you see? There is a large yellow envelope. me
|
|
|
0:24:25 – 0:24:30
I was already happy inside and thought, finally I get some mail and can
|
|
|
0:24:30 – 0:24:36
deal with things and thought to me in such a way, maybe one or the other creator could
|
|
|
0:24:36 – 0:24:43
The one who misunderstood something, and then I opened the envelope and saw
|
|
|
0:24:43 – 0:24:54
There is a temporary arrangement of the good lava. And I was really amazed.
|
|
|
0:24:54 – 0:25:01
An interim order? Why? Do you want that or can you say that?
|
|
|
0:25:01 – 0:25:04
Yes, you have to say it that way, it was also in the rush procedure.
|
|
|
0:25:04 – 0:25:13
Exactly, that was the urgent procedure. That is, she has, after she was with the police,
|
|
|
0:25:13 – 0:25:22
17.03.26, definitely there is stop, I have read all this and was
|
|
|
0:25:22 – 0:25:31
A little bit shocked that something like this is going through at all, because the arrangement is
|
|
|
0:25:31 – 0:25:39
really on me personally, on my person and on my business address from Talnews
|
|
|
0:25:39 – 0:25:50
I left. And then it was really said that I went to the applicant's apartment, i.e. Lavan,
|
|
|
0:25:50 – 0:25:57
may not approach the road more than 20 metres in any case,
|
|
|
0:25:57 – 0:26:02
Lavan may approach less than 20 meters, so she personally.
|
|
|
0:26:02 – 0:26:10
I'm not allowed to listen to her and I'm not allowed to communicate remotely either.
|
|
|
0:26:10 – 0:26:17
using social networks.
|
|
|
0:26:17 – 0:26:24
Nor can I bring about a meeting. And first there was the duration
|
|
|
0:26:24 – 0:26:32
the order is also limited in time until mid-September 2026.
|
|
|
0:26:32 – 0:26:42
And then it became quite clear that the costs of the proceedings I have to bear
|
|
|
0:26:42 – 0:26:48
the defendant and the value of the proceedings was set at EUR 1500.
|
|
|
0:26:48 – 0:26:56
And then it's funny, so for me it's funny and also for my lawyer it was funny,
|
|
|
0:26:56 – 0:27:09
because the decision is based on § 823, 100, 1004 BGB and that the applicant,
|
|
|
0:27:09 – 0:27:20
Lavan, therefore, has made it credible that I personally, Leon Wagemann, on 16.03.26 before
|
|
|
0:27:20 – 0:27:27
He went to his home and then turned his back on him.
|
|
|
0:27:27 – 0:27:35
He wrote several messages via WhatsApp. And that would be the case
|
|
|
0:27:35 – 0:27:43
fulfilled. But then we hold on to the place once again, for the listeners, who just pay attention
|
|
|
0:27:43 – 0:27:53
Leon has never been to the place where Lavan lives. This is an important thing and an
|
|
|
0:27:53 – 0:28:03
Contact via WhatsApp with the question catalog, which came about later.
|
|
|
0:28:03 – 0:28:10
So here you can prick up again. The address was confirmed on 16.03.1926,
|
|
|
0:28:10 – 0:28:15
then later in the afternoon area on the same day she received the questionnaire via WhatsApp.
|
|
|
0:28:15 – 0:28:20
Then there was the closest, so in the next instance there was also a telephone conversation on the
|
|
|
0:28:20 – 0:28:27
The same day and then a text message was written by her. Lawyer, she's going to do this.
|
|
|
0:28:27 – 0:28:32
I thought about it and then I was blocked. At that time there was no further rapprochement.
|
|
|
0:28:32 – 0:28:40
Or contact attempt. And when I received this, the request "to issue a one-time order",
|
|
|
0:28:40 – 0:28:50
Of course, I immediately took a lawyer who checked this and who has only
|
|
|
0:28:50 – 0:28:59
Shake your head. He said it went through at all. And I've got myself
|
|
|
0:28:59 – 0:29:04
I took some time and let it go through my head, okay, what am I being accused of here,
|
|
|
0:29:04 – 0:29:13
What do I have to stop, what reasons are there, but I very quickly realized, against this
|
|
|
0:29:13 – 0:29:22
I will appeal the decision and then have a request for oral proceedings.
|
|
|
0:29:22 – 0:29:33
put in place. It also came relatively quickly. And then we got ourselves, so me, my lawyer,
|
|
|
0:29:33 – 0:29:42
We consulted again, what do we do? And then we really went through everything.
|
|
|
0:29:42 – 0:29:49
The file was, I think, 450 pages. Accordingly, it took a very long time.
|
|
|
0:29:49 – 0:29:57
And then we both had to appear in court, that is Lavan and I,
|
|
|
0:29:57 – 0:30:03
and the respective defenders that are assigned.
|
|
|
0:30:03 – 0:30:04
The lawyers, right?
|
|
|
0:30:04 – 0:30:09
The lawyers, exactly. And in the meantime,
|
|
|
0:30:09 – 0:30:21
where I got the subpoena, then our Impulsiva comes into play. And you have to have them
|
|
|
0:30:21 – 0:30:27
Impulsiva, i.e. the lava, have pinned when this negotiation is and that it is at all
|
|
|
0:30:27 – 0:30:33
There is a trial. Yes, you have to say yes, in prehistory there were these
|
|
|
0:30:33 – 0:30:40
Reconnaissance streams, two or three pieces in number, where then the misconduct of sides stops
|
|
|
0:30:40 – 0:30:51
was processed by Impulsiva and Zem and that is, as I shall say, very detailed and
|
|
|
0:30:51 – 0:31:00
It was cut down to the smallest. And Lavando had already been quite finished, because you
|
|
|
0:31:00 – 0:31:06
She did everything in the name of animal welfare and, strangely enough, after working with Frank.
|
|
|
0:31:06 – 0:31:14
When she showed up, she was suddenly a big friend with Impulsiva again. Yes, with such a thick
|
|
|
0:31:14 – 0:31:20
It wasn't, so it went on and Sam got away from Impulsiva in the meantime.
|
|
|
0:31:20 – 0:31:28
Distant, but Impulsiva has continued and there was another livestream where LaVan
|
|
|
0:31:28 – 0:31:33
also has to call where impulsive lawan has also properly finished my
|
|
|
0:31:33 – 0:31:38
Opinion after and pressured has not let loose had questions
|
|
|
0:31:38 – 0:31:42
and you really have everything down to the smallest detail even the accusations
|
|
|
0:31:42 – 0:31:48
But I didn't discuss it until I turned on Leon with Talenius.
|
|
|
0:31:48 – 0:31:53
Suddenly you deleted all the content on the channel.
|
|
|
0:31:53 – 0:31:57
Frank had done that when there was a huge scandal.
|
|
|
0:31:57 – 0:32:01
One always wonders, what was the goal of Impulsiva?
|
|
|
0:32:01 – 0:32:03
Did she really want to do something about animal welfare?
|
|
|
0:32:03 – 0:32:07
Because then I would rather reach out to the press,
|
|
|
0:32:07 – 0:32:11
How to Suddenly Delete Everything
|
|
|
0:32:11 – 0:32:13
And to say, that never happened.
|
|
|
0:32:13 – 0:32:17
We must protect LaVarne under a false guise,
|
|
|
0:32:17 – 0:32:20
With the construct, what then?
|
|
|
0:32:21 – 0:32:24
It was built around you, Leon.
|
|
|
0:32:24 – 0:32:29
You have to protect the children of LaVan etc.
|
|
|
0:32:29 – 0:32:36
She would have panicked, because a giant construction was built in the background.
|
|
|
0:32:36 – 0:32:41
That's right. And this is also based on the interim order,
|
|
|
0:32:41 – 0:32:45
that they are worried about the children,
|
|
|
0:32:45 – 0:32:50
that someone else comes by, asks questions or even lurks from the house.
|
|
|
0:32:50 – 0:32:58
That never happened. You really only took three pictures, confirmed the address and then
|
|
|
0:32:58 – 0:33:05
You are also away from this spot, from the place of residence. And I find it fascinating that then said
|
|
|
0:33:05 – 0:33:10
Please take all those who have worked with me or where I have been in the
|
|
|
0:33:10 – 0:33:15
Livestream or in videos, please take it down immediately. I am afraid for my children,
|
|
|
0:33:15 – 0:33:26
Afterwards, they are still questioned and Sabrina, Impulsiva, of course, deleted it immediately.
|
|
|
0:33:26 – 0:33:34
But dear Frankie, he had to give himself some time for reflection and had to think about it
|
|
|
0:33:34 – 0:33:41
And in return, he also asked the Lavan why he was doing this video.
|
|
|
0:33:41 – 0:33:49
and I heard that the lava was really crying and that Frank was begging,
|
|
|
0:33:49 – 0:33:54
Tell him to take the videos because she's afraid for her children.
|
|
|
0:33:54 – 0:33:59
Yeah, that's what she said in Berni's coffee.
|
|
|
0:33:59 – 0:34:00
Exactly.
|
|
|
0:34:00 – 0:34:12
And then it went on. Then there was a live from Impulsiva, in which she had many topics
|
|
|
0:34:12 – 0:34:19
ravaged, among other things, the subject with lava and told her I will
|
|
|
0:34:19 – 0:34:24
support. I will now apply for a press card, I will take this money into my hands,
|
|
|
0:34:24 – 0:34:30
I will report to associations and will make this request.
|
|
|
0:34:30 – 0:34:36
Then I ask directly, where is the ID card now and from which association is it?
|
|
|
0:34:36 – 0:34:39
Because there are different press cards.
|
|
|
0:34:39 – 0:34:45
There is the press card, which you can get for 45 to 40 euros on the Internet,
|
|
|
0:34:45 – 0:34:49
It is not worth anything in front of the authorities.
|
|
|
0:34:49 – 0:34:56
So that means you can't legitimize yourself with such an ID card and get
|
|
|
0:34:56 – 0:34:58
No information from the authorities?
|
|
|
0:34:58 – 0:35:05
Right, you can't accredit yourself for any information, be it authorities,
|
|
|
0:35:05 – 0:35:14
be it other intuition, blue light, fire brigade, cities.
|
|
|
0:35:14 – 0:35:24
There are exceptions where you really need a press card. And this
|
|
|
0:35:24 – 0:35:32
She won't get a press card because she can't prove journalistic publications.
|
|
|
0:35:32 – 0:35:37
What are journalistic publications, Leon, for the people who don't know that?
|
|
|
0:35:37 – 0:35:48
So journalistic publications are really elaborated articles, blog pages, for example.
|
|
|
0:35:48 – 0:35:55
Yes, there is also a bit of opinion in it, but you have to mark this extra, but pure
|
|
|
0:35:55 – 0:36:03
Opinion blogging, what happens on YouTube, what Impulsiva does on YouTube and on Instagram
|
|
|
0:36:03 – 0:36:11
and so on. This does not count as a journalistic publication. There's too much opinion in there,
|
|
|
0:36:11 – 0:36:21
There's too much faecal language in there. There she would, so no association would there be a press card
|
|
|
0:36:21 – 0:36:29
issue. Not a serious association? No, not a serious association. So dear Impulsiva,
|
|
|
0:36:29 – 0:36:34
At that point, how about it, because you said in your livestream today,
|
|
|
0:36:34 – 0:36:41
that you are now in possession of a press card, how about you listen to us,
|
|
|
0:36:41 – 0:36:48
Show us who you are and tell us who you are from and what you are from.
|
|
|
0:36:48 – 0:36:55
Very good journalistic publications. I think that shouldn't be a problem
|
|
|
0:36:55 – 0:37:02
There should be a lot of them, if you're really in a serious business.
|
|
|
0:37:02 – 0:37:11
Yeah, so we're open to it. So I don't think you're in any bandage.
|
|
|
0:37:11 – 0:37:16
If you confirm and disclose this because of transparency, you stand for honesty,
|
|
|
0:37:16 – 0:37:23
I will personally apologize for that. But only if you do.
|
|
|
0:37:23 – 0:37:33
Thank you. Okay, on to the text. What did I want to say? That wasn't the only thing. She has yes,
|
|
|
0:37:33 – 0:37:39
I believe also the Impulsiva announced on the subject of support with lava, not only
|
|
|
0:37:39 – 0:37:45
with the press card, but did not also say that they would then be present in court
|
|
|
0:37:45 – 0:37:52
Will you support Lavaren? Exactly, that's very important again. In fact, she has
|
|
|
0:37:52 – 0:37:57
she then said in the video that she will apply for the ID card and will also make a request
|
|
|
0:37:57 – 0:38:07
in court in Duisburg and will report on the spot. It must have been at the end of March,
|
|
|
0:38:07 – 0:38:13
Early April. Now I have the presumption, because it is just not in possession of one
|
|
|
0:38:13 – 0:38:20
serious press card and the trial was not public,
|
|
|
0:38:20 – 0:38:25
She didn't get through it if she got an answer at all.
|
|
|
0:38:25 – 0:38:30
on a request, if she has ever made one at all.
|
|
|
0:38:30 – 0:38:36
At least she couldn't be present as a press, but why was she there?
|
|
|
0:38:36 – 0:38:41
Not as a friend on the spot, even if she'd just waited in front of the hall?
|
|
|
0:38:41 – 0:38:49
She said she supports Lahwane. Where was she? Was she there that day? Tell me, Leon.
|
|
|
0:38:49 – 0:38:56
No, no one was there. But of course, as a person, I had to assume that she would be there.
|
|
|
0:38:56 – 0:38:58
She had also announced big.
|
|
|
0:38:58 – 0:38:59
Yeah, that's it.
|
|
|
0:38:59 – 0:39:03
Personally, I understood that she would be there.
|
|
|
0:39:03 – 0:39:12
Exactly, but she wasn't. And before the trial started or the day came,
|
|
|
0:39:12 – 0:39:20
I applied for personal protection because I couldn't be sure.
|
|
|
0:39:20 – 0:39:28
That she won't be there. And then I was standing there when I arrived in the courtroom
|
|
|
0:39:28 – 0:39:38
There were also two watchmen, a woman and a gentleman, and they looked to see if it was all right.
|
|
|
0:39:38 – 0:39:43
So everything goes smoothly. Yes, that was also discussed in the livestream today
|
|
|
0:39:43 – 0:39:53
had. So rather suffisant that you had just requested security, personal protection. That's right,
|
|
|
0:39:53 – 0:40:03
because there are people in the environment, in the habitat of Impulsiva, who very much like to quickly
|
|
|
0:40:03 – 0:40:09
Physical violence tends. Yes, and from the events surrounding the negotiations in Cologne,
|
|
|
0:40:09 – 0:40:18
If you were, you were also a witness. To the detriment of Frank Batamann for memory.
|
|
|
0:40:18 – 0:40:24
Are you afraid of applying for personal protection?
|
|
|
0:40:24 – 0:40:26
Exactly.
|
|
|
0:40:26 – 0:40:28
It's an understandable move.
|
|
|
0:40:28 – 0:40:37
No one should say anything or be ridiculed in any way.
|
|
|
0:40:37 – 0:40:42
You have to expect that you will then be physically approached,
|
|
|
0:40:42 – 0:40:47
When it is announced that it will be there.
|
|
|
0:40:47 – 0:40:52
Yes, well, violence in the classical sense is not, if it is then on site,
|
|
|
0:40:52 – 0:40:57
because it is not that this is misunderstood, because Impulsiva likes to rotate a bit and
|
|
|
0:40:57 – 0:41:03
I like to reveal facts. It's just a matter of guessing that if Impulsiva had been there
|
|
|
0:41:03 – 0:41:09
Maybe she wouldn't be alone and since it's already happening, I'll say,
|
|
|
0:41:09 – 0:41:17
Crimes have come in the past, one protects oneself from possible, unplanned
|
|
|
0:41:17 – 0:41:28
Crimes, because presumption of innocence and so on. Do this in advance because you
|
|
|
0:41:28 – 0:41:34
In fact, due to the past, this could be expected. I hope I put it well.
|
|
|
0:41:34 – 0:41:41
Yes, now you have to say that you are not particularly good with Impulsiva.
|
|
|
0:41:41 – 0:41:43
That's true.
|
|
|
0:41:43 – 0:41:50
There is this accounting history and commissioning of debt collection office and that has
|
|
|
0:41:50 – 0:41:54
Today she had all the topics in her livestream and you have also
|
|
|
0:41:54 – 0:41:58
Clearly belongs to how she stands on the matter.
|
|
|
0:41:58 – 0:42:06
Yeah, that's one thing. I can't believe she's making it public,
|
|
|
0:42:06 – 0:42:11
But that is their own problem. And yes, I can harm myself, I have a
|
|
|
0:42:11 – 0:42:17
Instructed by the collection service. Because the bill is justified.
|
|
|
0:42:17 – 0:42:24
If you want, we can come back to that right away. We will only be in the meanwhile
|
|
|
0:42:24 – 0:42:34
Keep going. Then came the trial. You went to court with your lawyer that day.
|
|
|
0:42:34 – 0:42:45
Exactly. Who was there in court? For the first time I was there all alone and already had a
|
|
|
0:42:45 – 0:42:49
A little worried that the lawyer will be late, which he did. He's a few minutes
|
|
|
0:42:49 – 0:42:55
It was late, but it wasn't so bad because the judge had the door.
|
|
|
0:42:55 – 0:43:05
Opened up from the lecture hall and asked if Lavan was gone. She was on site. I was there too.
|
|
|
0:43:05 – 0:43:12
And then she said that my lawyer's secretariat called, that he was late.
|
|
|
0:43:12 – 0:43:17
and that she will have a drink now and the trial for a short time,
|
|
|
0:43:17 – 0:43:25
Until my lawyer interrupts it. Then came my lawyer. We've got a little
|
|
|
0:43:25 – 0:43:32
And he said so, but you have a lot of supporters on the Internet. They have great
|
|
|
0:43:32 – 0:43:38
Reach on Instagram, on their website. And I said that was true. The website,
|
|
|
0:43:38 – 0:43:47
This is really important, especially for the elderly. And then the judge came along.
|
|
|
0:43:47 – 0:43:58
quickly back and you could already see that Lavan had such a lump in her throat because she was there as a person
|
|
|
0:43:58 – 0:44:09
was alone. Because she said that her lawyer, whom she had commissioned, did not today
|
|
|
0:44:09 – 0:44:17
He is present and because he has an appointment, an important appointment in Cologne. And the judge
|
|
|
0:44:17 – 0:44:24
He said, "Wait a minute, I don't know if you're going to be a lawyer or if you're going to be a lawyer.
|
|
|
0:44:24 – 0:44:30
Some documents were even requested by a lawyer." And there you have already noticed,
|
|
|
0:44:30 – 0:44:34
This is where the pulse line really went.
|
|
|
0:44:34 – 0:44:36
Ah, she had pulse.
|
|
|
0:44:36 – 0:44:38
She had a pulse, definitely.
|
|
|
0:44:38 – 0:44:41
How was it, if I may ask,
|
|
|
0:44:41 – 0:44:43
The appearance of LaVane?
|
|
|
0:44:43 – 0:44:45
Can you describe,
|
|
|
0:44:45 – 0:44:48
How she was dressed and how she was dressed?
|
|
|
0:44:48 – 0:44:51
Was she polite? Did she say hello?
|
|
|
0:44:51 – 0:44:53
How did she look like that?
|
|
|
0:44:53 – 0:44:57
She came over quite calmly.
|
|
|
0:44:57 – 0:45:03
She has a black robe, I'll call it, worn.
|
|
|
0:45:03 – 0:45:05
She was wearing a headscarf.
|
|
|
0:45:05 – 0:45:09
I know she's converted.
|
|
|
0:45:09 – 0:45:14
And she ignored me.
|
|
|
0:45:14 – 0:45:18
And I didn't look at her either,
|
|
|
0:45:18 – 0:45:23
to simply aggressions that might arise there with her,
|
|
|
0:45:23 – 0:45:26
Just get her out of the way.
|
|
|
0:45:26 – 0:45:33
I sat there, read my notes again and then it went quickly.
|
|
|
0:45:33 – 0:45:42
The lawyer came, the judge came, we went to the courtroom, and then we all sat down.
|
|
|
0:45:42 – 0:45:52
And then the judge started, who is there, the avalanche is there, I am there as a person, my defender is there.
|
|
|
0:45:52 – 0:45:58
Then this was first taken to the minutes and then there were certain questions.
|
|
|
0:45:58 – 0:46:06
You were allowed to laver first, first to express how it came to this request at all.
|
|
|
0:46:06 – 0:46:09
She did that too.
|
|
|
0:46:09 – 0:46:18
She gave it very objectively, only she got involved in a lot of things.
|
|
|
0:46:18 – 0:46:27
Because she only said she was when she got the catalogue of questions, she would have been in the Aldi.
|
|
|
0:46:27 – 0:46:36
And their children, their two daughters, who are uncalculated between the ages of 15 and 16, would have been at home.
|
|
|
0:46:36 – 0:46:42
And of course she immediately called home and asked if everything was good.
|
|
|
0:46:42 – 0:46:45
And whether the children have noticed anything.
|
|
|
0:46:45 – 0:46:48
And the children denied it.
|
|
|
0:46:48 – 0:46:51
They didn't see anything and couldn't confirm either.
|
|
|
0:46:51 – 0:46:56
That I was there as a person, as Leon.
|
|
|
0:46:56 – 0:46:57
And then it went on.
|
|
|
0:46:57 – 0:47:01
Then the judge asked more explicitly,
|
|
|
0:47:01 – 0:47:03
How that happened then.
|
|
|
0:47:03 – 0:47:08
That she got the catalogue of questions that was in the Aldi at the time,
|
|
|
0:47:08 – 0:47:11
Then he thought,
|
|
|
0:47:11 – 0:47:16
Why do I get a 17-page, uh, 14-page questionnaire?
|
|
|
0:47:16 – 0:47:22
Um, and she didn't know Talnews.
|
|
|
0:47:22 – 0:47:26
And uh, didn't know me as a person either.
|
|
|
0:47:26 – 0:47:31
And then the judge asked more explicitly, so you can confirm,
|
|
|
0:47:31 – 0:47:35
that the accused who sits in front of you,
|
|
|
0:47:35 – 0:47:40
Was in front of your house and took pictures?
|
|
|
0:47:40 – 0:47:44
And then she ignored the question and said,
|
|
|
0:47:44 – 0:47:50
No, wait a minute, I was in the rewe when I got the questionnaire.
|
|
|
0:47:50 – 0:47:52
Not with Aldi?
|
|
|
0:47:52 – 0:47:56
No, she was in Rewe.
|
|
|
0:47:56 – 0:48:06
And then she says she read through the catalogue of questions and at first she completely
|
|
|
0:48:06 – 0:48:15
asked many questions about why, why, why and then she would have called me, several times, that has
|
|
|
0:48:15 – 0:48:23
She admits, and the judge asks, "Wait a minute, you're applying for an injunction."
|
|
|
0:48:23 – 0:48:37
that the Lord who sits in front of them, i.e. me, would harass them and make them feel threatened. In
|
|
|
0:48:37 – 0:48:47
In return, they call the Lord several times. What kind of relationship is that? And there she has
|
|
|
0:48:47 – 0:48:54
Good La was then said, yes I became curious. I wanted to know why, what now
|
|
|
0:48:54 – 0:49:00
That's how things go. And then she just told me a little bit about the whole topic,
|
|
|
0:49:00 – 0:49:05
that she has already been checked by animal welfare and then the judge has become a little louder,
|
|
|
0:49:05 – 0:49:12
Because the judge said this isn't going to be discussed here today. It is being negotiated,
|
|
|
0:49:12 – 0:49:22
whether the accused stood at their home in front of the door and massively harassed them and so
|
|
|
0:49:22 – 0:49:28
He wrote a lot of messages via WhatsApp. That's the case and I'm going to talk about it today.
|
|
|
0:49:28 – 0:49:38
decide. And then it was pretty clear. I was able to prove it because my
|
|
|
0:49:38 – 0:49:44
My lawyer then sent the entire chat history to the court.
|
|
|
0:49:44 – 0:49:51
And as already announced, it really came down to the catalogue of questions, that they then
|
|
|
0:49:51 – 0:49:52
report to the lawyer.
|
|
|
0:49:52 – 0:49:58
I then explained to her again in simple language that you would like to comment on this.
|
|
|
0:49:58 – 0:50:02
and that she should no longer be harassed.
|
|
|
0:50:02 – 0:50:04
Opinion will not be given.
|
|
|
0:50:04 – 0:50:05
Have a nice evening.
|
|
|
0:50:05 – 0:50:07
She takes care of her animals and children now.
|
|
|
0:50:07 – 0:50:11
And then the conversation was over, so the text messages were over.
|
|
|
0:50:11 – 0:50:20
And then the judge realized that something could not be right.
|
|
|
0:50:20 – 0:50:25
After all, who is going to apply for a temporary injunction?
|
|
|
0:50:25 – 0:50:31
And this again noted here, the interim order was issued the next day,
|
|
|
0:50:31 – 0:50:41
The next day. This means that the questionnaire was sent out on 16.03.26. On 17.03.26 she is at
|
|
|
0:50:41 – 0:50:49
It was the police. Then the call was with the chief commissioner and right after that she goes to court
|
|
|
0:50:49 – 0:50:57
to a judicial officer and has an affidavit. Listeners need to understand this.
|
|
|
0:50:57 – 0:51:06
make. An affidavit. She says 100 percent she swears she saw me
|
|
|
0:51:06 – 0:51:17
I took the pictures and I was there. Me as a person. And that's why it's
|
|
|
0:51:17 – 0:51:26
the preliminary hearing has been held or the decision has been obtained. But in court could
|
|
|
0:51:26 – 0:51:31
Then they don't prove it? Did she repeat that statement again?
|
|
|
0:51:31 – 0:51:38
No, she didn't repeat the statement. She clearly said she had her
|
|
|
0:51:38 – 0:51:44
Children asked. They couldn't confirm it. Neighbours are not all
|
|
|
0:51:44 – 0:51:52
The German language is powerful. So they couldn't confirm it either. And then the judge
|
|
|
0:51:52 – 0:52:02
Then asked, and why do they testify under oath that they have seen the Lord? And there she was
|
|
|
0:52:02 – 0:52:10
Of course, she lost that she messed up. Most importantly, they also have an
|
|
|
0:52:10 – 0:52:17
Wrong old-fashioned insurance. That's right, and then my defender
|
|
|
0:52:17 – 0:52:22
He also asked and asked a few questions about the
|
|
|
0:52:22 – 0:52:28
Affidavits she gave and she was asked.
|
|
|
0:52:28 – 0:52:32
Can they really say 100 percent that my client is there?
|
|
|
0:52:32 – 0:52:38
Was it? Can you 100 percent confirm that he took photos?
|
|
|
0:52:38 – 0:52:43
Because we have the photos. According to metadata, these photos are not even from
|
|
|
0:52:43 – 0:52:49
have been made to their end device, let alone by the digital camera or SLR camera.
|
|
|
0:52:49 – 0:53:00
And then she answered, no, she can't confirm that. And then has
|
|
|
0:53:00 – 0:53:09
In any event, my defence counsel requested that the interlocutory injunction be
|
|
|
0:53:09 – 0:53:17
immediate effect is set aside, so that it is laid down, first of all until the decision.
|
|
|
0:53:17 – 0:53:28
And then the judge said it wasn't relatively so. The good lava
|
|
|
0:53:28 – 0:53:34
I couldn't prove that I said, because I was supposed to have said on the phone,
|
|
|
0:53:34 – 0:53:41
that I have been there and have taken pictures and that I personally confirm the address
|
|
|
0:53:41 – 0:53:48
I know I've been there. That's what she said, and I was able to refute it.
|
|
|
0:53:48 – 0:53:55
by saying, no, I haven't been there, I've never been to Duisburg to this day,
|
|
|
0:53:55 – 0:54:05
What I can remember is that I said on the phone that there was someone on the ground and that
|
|
|
0:54:05 – 0:54:15
Address confirmed. And then the judge said, labern, the thing is through,
|
|
|
0:54:15 – 0:54:21
they make a one-two order here, practically take an oath of Mine, which is then still
|
|
|
0:54:21 – 0:54:25
It will be checked whether she has committed the Main oath intentionally.
|
|
|
0:54:25 – 0:54:34
Main oath or affidavit? These are actually two different
|
|
|
0:54:34 – 0:54:36
Clothes, isn't it?
|
|
|
0:54:36 – 0:54:43
A main oath would have been if she had made the affidavit
|
|
|
0:54:43 – 0:54:47
In the meantime, I knew it was a lie.
|
|
|
0:54:47 – 0:54:52
Okay, all right. I'm just asking.
|
|
|
0:54:52 – 0:54:57
That's how it is, that's how I know it and that's how I would give it again and again.
|
|
|
0:54:57 – 0:55:02
Unless it's something else, of course I apologize for it.
|
|
|
0:55:02 – 0:55:07
But it is now under criminal review by the public prosecutor's office,
|
|
|
0:55:07 – 0:55:09
The extent to which she lied.
|
|
|
0:55:09 – 0:55:18
Then it came quite quickly to the fact that the judge said that Laban has lost,
|
|
|
0:55:18 – 0:55:30
That this thing is just through. She was looking for contact again. There is no reason for that,
|
|
|
0:55:30 – 0:55:38
to issue a single order. Then all this was recorded by dictation device.
|
|
|
0:55:38 – 0:55:47
And when we were all done, then came the sentence of her, O-tone, memory record,
|
|
|
0:55:47 – 0:55:54
Oh, you know what, my defender, who didn't show up today, he advised me,
|
|
|
0:55:54 – 0:56:01
I'm taking back the restraining order, it's best anyway because I don't have any evidence.
|
|
|
0:56:01 – 0:56:05
That's what she said at the end?
|
|
|
0:56:05 – 0:56:13
At the end of the trial, when it was clear that I won as a person, as Leon Hagemann.
|
|
|
0:56:13 – 0:56:16
How did the judge respond?
|
|
|
0:56:16 – 0:56:21
She said, what are we sitting here for?
|
|
|
0:56:21 – 0:56:25
That would have been before the beginning of the trial or during the beginning of the trial.
|
|
|
0:56:25 – 0:56:28
At the beginning of the trial, you can say,
|
|
|
0:56:28 – 0:56:31
withdraw the interim order.
|
|
|
0:56:31 – 0:56:35
Lavan didn't say anything.
|
|
|
0:56:35 – 0:56:45
After that, when all this was dictated, she then pleaded again,
|
|
|
0:56:45 – 0:56:54
Yes, but at any time the Animal Welfare and Veterinary Office, which were also there and
|
|
|
0:56:54 – 0:56:58
have checked me and have not been able to detect any flaws at the first moment, have
|
|
|
0:56:58 – 0:57:03
I only gave tips and of course the judge again "this is not being negotiated here, this is
|
|
|
0:57:03 – 0:57:09
It's not my discretion, we're really just referring to the interim order.
|
|
|
0:57:09 – 0:57:23
And then the thing was actually done. I was sprinkled with hormones, I was happy,
|
|
|
0:57:23 – 0:57:32
'Cause that was a tough thing that came to me because she didn't
|
|
|
0:57:32 – 0:57:39
Charnews as a company in the deficiency, but she has taken me personally in the deficiency
|
|
|
0:57:39 – 0:57:46
and ordered an interim order to be issued. And you can see that she also
|
|
|
0:57:46 – 0:57:53
He just lied. On the one hand, when she took out the affidavit.
|
|
|
0:57:53 – 0:58:01
And I don't know what the other content creators told me, especially Impulsiva,
|
|
|
0:58:01 – 0:58:08
Bernie, Frank, whatever, who. Here you can hear what went on in court and then you should
|
|
|
0:58:08 – 0:58:16
Think again and remember, is all that Lavan says true?
|
|
|
0:58:16 – 0:58:22
You may have all noticed that Lavan is always in the wrong statements
|
|
|
0:58:22 – 0:58:30
He has been involved in the creation of all sorts of content creators, and has also been involved in all sorts of untruths.
|
|
|
0:58:30 – 0:58:37
He told stories or later recounted them in a different way. And there I would also
|
|
|
0:58:37 – 0:58:45
Instead of some content creators, consider sharing information that isn't
|
|
|
0:58:45 – 0:58:51
I'm sure I'm going to say something about it, because that's embarrassing and it could also be embarrassing.
|
|
|
0:58:51 – 0:58:57
Perhaps there are legal consequences, because we are also in the area of reputational damage.
|
|
|
0:58:57 – 0:59:05
You have to say that again, if you bring Talenews into disrepute and actually
|
|
|
0:59:05 – 0:59:09
Everything went the same way as an editor does.
|
|
|
0:59:09 – 0:59:16
Yes, you have to say, it's not for nothing that Frank's cooperation
|
|
|
0:59:16 – 0:59:23
ended with LaVan because she made contradictory statements to him that Sabrina
|
|
|
0:59:23 – 0:59:28
The same thing was said in a livestream, i.e. Impulsiva.
|
|
|
0:59:28 – 0:59:35
Several people have publicly said in livestreams that they are contradictory statements.
|
|
|
0:59:35 – 0:59:40
It came from LaVan. And that's why we stop working together.
|
|
|
0:59:40 – 0:59:46
Yes, of course it is interesting that you can see again, LaVan has now a few
|
|
|
0:59:46 – 0:59:53
Days streamed again. You can also talk about what they are all about.
|
|
|
0:59:53 – 0:59:59
Stacked had left in their livestreams. And it was interesting that Impulsiva also
|
|
|
0:59:59 – 1:00:06
She was a guest because she was supposedly talked about in the livestream. And LaVan was also today
|
|
|
1:00:06 – 1:00:15
Very active in the chat on the go with the live stream of Impulsiva. So they still seem
|
|
|
1:00:15 – 1:00:22
to be in exchange. Only support LaVan has not received in the presence of Impulsiva in court,
|
|
|
1:00:22 – 1:00:25
This is what Impulsiva has said.
|
|
|
1:00:25 – 1:00:35
Yes, I mean, we've also listened to some livestreams lately and we've had
|
|
|
1:00:35 – 1:00:41
We talked to you, Leon, about it. Best of all was the livestream from now on.
|
|
|
1:00:41 – 1:00:48
I believe yesterday or was the day before yesterday where in 80 minutes livestream, I believe 50 times
|
|
|
1:00:48 - 1:01:00
Ali has fallen. Oh yeah, it's still in my head, the live. Yes, and that was the live,
|
|
|
1:01:00 – 1:01:12
where Impulsiva was also present and you have to say, that was such a reckoning with
|
|
|
1:01:12 – 1:01:21
various people and things have fallen there, about which LaVan then reported
|
|
|
1:01:21 – 1:01:28
in the last few live streams where she was not present. Where you just realized that
|
|
|
1:01:28 – 1:01:35
He received the information from other people. Just like our live back then with
|
|
|
1:01:35 – 1:01:45
with Frank and Dier Leon on TikTok. The content has also been cited. And yes,
|
|
|
1:01:45 – 1:01:53
It just raises questions. Why do you distance yourself so much from a person?
|
|
|
1:01:53 – 1:02:02
But then it also provides information. Yeah, that's very funny. On the one hand, they say,
|
|
|
1:02:02 – 1:02:06
Oh yeah, we're more like that, we keep our distance now.
|
|
|
1:02:06 – 1:02:09
And yet it happens in livestreams,
|
|
|
1:02:09 – 1:02:12
to discuss each other,
|
|
|
1:02:12 – 1:02:14
They are present in the livestream.
|
|
|
1:02:14 – 1:02:17
It doesn't matter if it's more impulsive with "Lavan"
|
|
|
1:02:17 – 1:02:19
or "Lavan" in "Impulsiver".
|
|
|
1:02:19 – 1:02:21
That's a little strange.
|
|
|
1:02:21 – 1:02:25
And I have to say, this live from "Lavan",
|
|
|
1:02:25 – 1:02:27
She's gone off like a suppository.
|
|
|
1:02:27 – 1:02:31
Yeah, like I said, in 90, uh, 80 minutes
|
|
|
1:02:31 – 1:02:40
50 times Allie, so Marie Käferchen was mentioned there and not exactly positive. Among other things,
|
|
|
1:02:40 – 1:02:45
other content creators and what they did in the livestreams they had done before,
|
|
|
1:02:45 – 1:02:54
where she had compared the dead whale, Hope or Timmy with Jesus and described herself as an absolute
|
|
|
1:02:54 – 1:03:02
She is a woman who does everything she can to protect animals. And if you look at the whole
|
|
|
1:03:02 – 1:03:06
Look at her communication and the livestreams a bit analytical
|
|
|
1:03:06 – 1:03:15
Look, this is a catastrophe. The woman should be taken away from the internet. Doesn't do that
|
|
|
1:03:15 – 1:03:24
good. Yes, and it is a self-distance already, as it actually presents itself publicly. And
|
|
|
1:03:24 – 1:03:30
Actually, she would have to notice it very personally.
|
|
|
1:03:30 – 1:03:36
One only thinks of the question, the poor children, they even know what their mum is doing.
|
|
|
1:03:36 – 1:03:38
Doing it on the Internet?
|
|
|
1:03:38 – 1:03:41
Yeah, that's one thing I was wondering.
|
|
|
1:03:41 – 1:03:50
The accusations that Sam and Impulsiva raised at the time were all information.
|
|
|
1:03:50 – 1:03:56
which she herself has dripped in her live streams and stop when she was a guest at
|
|
|
1:03:56 – 1:03:57
other live streams.
|
|
|
1:03:57 – 1:04:01
And that fell before her feet.
|
|
|
1:04:01 – 1:04:07
And it must have learned at some point or should actually learn that these
|
|
|
1:04:07 – 1:04:11
The problems she has are her own.
|
|
|
1:04:11 – 1:04:12
But no, that just doesn't happen.
|
|
|
1:04:12 – 1:04:14
She just keeps going.
|
|
|
1:04:14 – 1:04:19
And you can see that there are people who are simply not well served by the Internet.
|
|
|
1:04:19 – 1:04:23
In fact, they should be protected from themselves.
|
|
|
1:04:23 – 1:04:30
And that's the crass thing, she still thinks she's right about everything she does.
|
|
|
1:04:30 – 1:04:34
That everything is as true as it says it is.
|
|
|
1:04:34 – 1:04:41
Yes, and then it just happens that it just gets such an escalation spiral,
|
|
|
1:04:41 – 1:04:47
Just like now, that you are sitting in court and then the process is more likely to fall before your feet.
|
|
|
1:04:47 – 1:04:52
Exactly because she is now allowed to pay all the court costs.
|
|
|
1:04:52 – 1:05:00
Yeah, I mean, it's all expensive and it just burns a bunch of money. For nothing and again nothing.
|
|
|
1:05:00 – 1:05:08
Exactly. She also requested legal aid. That's what Judge Ehrweiler has right now.
|
|
|
1:05:08 – 1:05:13
I took it and said they'd get it, but I'm not going to approve it 99 percent of the time.
|
|
|
1:05:13 – 1:05:20
Because they simply claimed false facts.
|
|
|
1:05:20 – 1:05:23
You just can't think of that.
|
|
|
1:05:23 – 1:05:29
That's really crass. You have to trust that first. You have to trust,
|
|
|
1:05:29 – 1:05:38
To say something like that. He was on the spot. I confirm this by oath and take the risk
|
|
|
1:05:38 – 1:05:45
that a decision is then adopted and then oral proceedings are held, and that
|
|
|
1:05:45 – 1:05:51
then still has the courage to get there and try to turn it around, but does not make it,
|
|
|
1:05:51 – 1:05:58
In the end, I want to say that I am withdrawing the motion. And then after a day or two
|
|
|
1:05:58 – 1:06:04
sit down in a livestream, make fun of it, about the whole situation,
|
|
|
1:06:04 – 1:06:12
that I did so well research and what great research we did and what kind of
|
|
|
1:06:12 – 1:06:20
a good editor we are, what good journalists and then she also suddenly caught
|
|
|
1:06:20 – 1:06:26
that I think I would have shot myself in her, that I had something of her
|
|
|
1:06:26 – 1:06:35
want in the classical sense of love. Yeah, you're obsessed with her. Yes, so no,
|
|
|
1:06:35 – 1:06:46
I'm not obsessed with her. And the funniest thing is, you have the outward appearance of
|
|
|
1:06:46 – 1:06:53
That which is not evil for God's sake. Everyone is allowed to act on their own and have their own religion and
|
|
|
1:06:53 – 1:06:57
Believe in what he wants. If you have a person sitting in front of you,
|
|
|
1:06:57 – 1:07:10
Dressed accordingly, but speaking with a dialect, I find that a bit amusing.
|
|
|
1:07:10 – 1:07:16
Yeah, I can imagine what you want out of it. You have, if you only have the voice
|
|
|
1:07:16 – 1:07:23
Listen or something like that, keep a certain image in mind. That's easy. And if you have someone
|
|
|
1:07:23 – 1:07:29
Real looks and that just doesn't fit together, then of course that's amusing.
|
|
|
1:07:29 – 1:07:30
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:07:30 – 1:07:39
But I find it super interesting how she expresses herself. I think if you listen to her,
|
|
|
1:07:39 – 1:07:46
This is also very funny with the dialect, even in their videos.
|
|
|
1:07:46 – 1:07:54
Yes, especially in the livestreams of the last week, so in the last days they made
|
|
|
1:07:54 – 1:08:00
had, it had been so that she distorted the voice and then chased people
|
|
|
1:08:00 – 1:08:07
and then said that she had no shashibitti, what do you call that again,
|
|
|
1:08:07 – 1:08:16
Schätschibititti or something like that, many things do not understand and must constantly ask and the
|
|
|
1:08:16 – 1:08:26
It was already a revelation. Yes, that was it, and Lavan could not pronounce the word loyalty either.
|
|
|
1:08:26 – 1:08:37
That was amusing. This isn't an inhibition or anything, but it's so damn conspicuous. Man
|
|
|
1:08:37 – 1:08:40
I'm worried.
|
|
|
1:08:40 – 1:08:41
Yeah, it's like that.
|
|
|
1:08:41 – 1:08:46
And one wonders, without being ironic about that now, that's really my seriousness, how
|
|
|
1:08:46 – 1:08:48
Could the woman be so old?
|
|
|
1:08:48 – 1:08:55
And how does a woman succeed, depending on if you sometimes listen to her in places,
|
|
|
1:08:55 – 1:09:00
their approach as generally as an adult woman with children succeeds in
|
|
|
1:09:00 – 1:09:03
Living an independent life?
|
|
|
1:09:03 – 1:09:04
Fully comprehensive.
|
|
|
1:09:04 – 1:09:09
Fully comprehensive. If you listen to her so partially, you naturally also ask yourself the question,
|
|
|
1:09:09 – 1:09:16
She doesn't need more support in her life. But this is
|
|
|
1:09:16 – 1:09:18
Just my personal impression.
|
|
|
1:09:18 – 1:09:27
Yes, so my advice is to take the Internet away from the woman. That doesn't do her any good. It develops
|
|
|
1:09:27 – 1:09:39
Any ideas and theories. It deals with things that are not important. Whether
|
|
|
1:09:39 – 1:09:44
now fixed in the Walffinna the tracker with one screw or with two screws
|
|
|
1:09:44 – 1:09:54
became. Then she has an app where she can track whale sightings and ship movements
|
|
|
1:09:54 – 1:10:03
And then she has such essential fears and needs that you could stop her there.
|
|
|
1:10:03 – 1:10:09
So for me, this is just a picture of a person who is outrageous with life,
|
|
|
1:10:09 – 1:10:16
is overwhelmed with real life and then gets caught up in such tiny details,
|
|
|
1:10:16 – 1:10:23
to keep control of her life completely out of control.
|
|
|
1:10:23 – 1:10:26
Yeah, that's kind of sad.
|
|
|
1:10:26 – 1:10:34
I can only advise people like LaVan not to put everything private in public,
|
|
|
1:10:34 – 1:10:39
Don't go to every content creator and tell their life story.
|
|
|
1:10:39 – 1:10:45
and, above all, to tell untruths, then to contradict one another.
|
|
|
1:10:45 – 1:10:49
It just doesn't paint a good picture of you.
|
|
|
1:10:49 – 1:10:54
As I said, it's all very questionable.
|
|
|
1:10:54 – 1:11:01
Yes, especially if you felt two different content creators in one day
|
|
|
1:11:01 – 1:11:04
They tell different versions of the same story.
|
|
|
1:11:04 – 1:11:07
It has to fall in front of your feet someday.
|
|
|
1:11:07 – 1:11:09
Of course.
|
|
|
1:11:09 – 1:11:13
And since we are already at "falling before the feet",
|
|
|
1:11:13 – 1:11:18
Now I would like to come back to the matter between you and Impulsiva,
|
|
|
1:11:18 – 1:11:26
If you want, with the debt collection service and the bill and so on.
|
|
|
1:11:26 – 1:11:28
And thank you for the assignment.
|
|
|
1:11:28 – 1:11:38
Thanks for the job, exactly. In this sense, she has accepted my mission or it is a
|
|
|
1:11:38 – 1:11:44
Order came about in which she took my text, reposted it, made a false
|
|
|
1:11:44 – 1:11:52
The source is set. This is a contract. The contract was concluded and therefore
|
|
|
1:11:52 – 1:11:58
I charged her the bill. And if she had paid the bill improperly, nothing would have happened either.
|
|
|
1:11:58 – 1:12:05
continue to happen. So you do what other people do when you stop their content,
|
|
|
1:12:05 – 1:12:12
Use pictures, music, texts and so on, also make.
|
|
|
1:12:12 – 1:12:13
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:12:13 – 1:12:17
And what your right as an editor is.
|
|
|
1:12:17 – 1:12:18
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:12:18 – 1:12:21
Whatever anyone else would do.
|
|
|
1:12:21 – 1:12:26
Yes, that's right, because she had taken the entire text and reposted it and was able to
|
|
|
1:12:26 – 1:12:32
Don't be dismayed by the quote, so she took a short snippet and there's something
|
|
|
1:12:32 – 1:12:36
I would have said so. That would have been perfectly fine, but she just has a wrong one.
|
|
|
1:12:36 – 1:12:42
Query information set and accordingly I have completed an invoice. This invoice,
|
|
|
1:12:42 – 1:12:52
Then there were also reminders from me and with late fees and quasi reminder fees.
|
|
|
1:12:52 – 1:13:14
And yes, then we were accused, or I was accused, that I allegedly sent her an invoice, then a reminder and then another invoice, where I would then have withdrawn the reminder fees, which definitely does not correspond to the truth.
|
|
|
1:13:14 – 1:13:28
Yes, but this thing, i.e. this process, she almost blamed, which Frank also accused at the time, that he had taken content from her, without mentioning the source and so on.
|
|
|
1:13:28 – 1:13:33
And then the whole conflict with Frank arose.
|
|
|
1:13:33 – 1:13:45
Yeah, yeah, that's not the first time she's done that. In the past, she has used our content and has not mentioned a source.
|
|
|
1:13:45 – 1:13:52
And this time my lawyer said, clear, bill, done.
|
|
|
1:13:52 – 1:14:02
So she has done several times already what she accuses the Frank and makes a big rear hatch.
|
|
|
1:14:02 – 1:14:06
But if you're doing stern shit, that's bad.
|
|
|
1:14:06 – 1:14:07
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:14:07 – 1:14:10
Well, that's kind of double standard for me.
|
|
|
1:14:10 – 1:14:21
Mm-hmm. She always talks about it, yes the Frank is a double standard and is back and forth and even she is not better.
|
|
|
1:14:21 – 1:14:27
Yes, and the interesting thing is, and I want to do it right here, because you're here right now.
|
|
|
1:14:27 – 1:14:30
I'm asking that, not Leon asking that.
|
|
|
1:14:30 – 1:14:35
Impulsiva, you always ask Frank when he pays his bills, etc.
|
|
|
1:14:35 – 1:14:40
Peepee. Impulsiva, when are you planning to pay your bills?
|
|
|
1:14:40 – 1:14:42
You have to ask now.
|
|
|
1:14:42 – 1:14:46
This has been going on for several weeks, months now, when the bill is open.
|
|
|
1:14:46 – 1:14:53
And recently, that was also the subject of the court hearing between you and Frank,
|
|
|
1:14:53 – 1:15:00
Talnews was also present as a press. Yes, there too this topic came up for discussion
|
|
|
1:15:00 – 1:15:07
with your partner, who also wanted to pay this sum,
|
|
|
1:15:07 – 1:15:09
If I remember correctly. Or is it, Leon?
|
|
|
1:15:09 – 1:15:15
Exactly. He was with me and asked me, how much is the sum? Okay,
|
|
|
1:15:15 – 1:15:21
I can't settle it in cash right away and in advance he said the sum is so
|
|
|
1:15:21 – 1:15:27
we can't agree on the sum I give you now cash just and with that
|
|
|
1:15:27 – 1:15:34
where i told him no good lord this can't be done if you absolutely pay the bill
|
|
|
1:15:34 – 1:15:39
Would you like to call me or write to me because I just had another visit
|
|
|
1:15:39 – 1:15:43
card given and then you can like me no matter who pays the bill main thing the
|
|
|
1:15:43 – 1:15:52
Invoice is paid. And shortly after that sentence fell, Frank was attacked.
|
|
|
1:15:52 – 1:15:58
Interesting is the thing, you always have to ask yourself the question, why does someone want to bar
|
|
|
1:15:58 – 1:16:05
Make on-site without invoice, without bank transfer. If there is such a thing in the room, a bill,
|
|
|
1:16:05 – 1:16:13
and you also act as a serious editor, as a company, then you make such a payment
|
|
|
1:16:13 – 1:16:21
Not nearly black on the hand, because by the way. That is all his correctness.
|
|
|
1:16:21 – 1:16:25
You have to, and that should be understandable. I would also like a receipt for it,
|
|
|
1:16:25 – 1:16:34
That I paid. That's right, that's right. And that didn't happen, but he would have
|
|
|
1:16:34 – 1:16:40
You can pay in hindsight, he didn't. Impulsiva doesn't have its bill either.
|
|
|
1:16:40 – 1:16:47
pays that the whole thing then had to go to the collection service, in the end, because you want yes
|
|
|
1:16:47 – 1:16:52
of course have his money, just like the others want their money and then because of their claims
|
|
|
1:16:52 – 1:16:59
Going to debt collection agencies, Leon did as well. So Impulsiva, why do you have your bill
|
|
|
1:16:59 – 1:17:03
Not paid? Like I said, it's not your first offense. The fact is, this account is
|
|
|
1:17:03 – 1:17:11
In the room, why isn't she being paid? That's what I'm asking you. And before you accuse someone else,
|
|
|
1:17:11 – 1:17:17
Pay the bills, pay your own first, then you can do that to other people.
|
|
|
1:17:17 – 1:17:24
accuse. Are we doing this for the future? Thank you very much. Then I would have another
|
|
|
1:17:24 – 1:17:31
Ask without going into too much detail, because it's also about impulses and also about you and yourself.
|
|
|
1:17:31 – 1:17:39
around us. The day the attack took place on Frank, at the trial between
|
|
|
1:17:39 – 1:17:47
Impulsiva and Frank, after the bodily injury story, you had about the thing
|
|
|
1:17:47 – 1:17:56
We reported it, and we reported it. Impulsiva wanted us to
|
|
|
1:17:56 – 1:18:03
make any corrections
|
|
|
1:18:03 – 1:18:05
We should, and otherwise we would.
|
|
|
1:18:05 – 1:18:07
Admonish everyone. We'll get mail from
|
|
|
1:18:07 – 1:18:09
Lawyer, she's grown up several times.
|
|
|
1:18:09 – 1:18:11
We have announced that we have legal
|
|
|
1:18:11 – 1:18:15
The consequences would come and Tanius would also
|
|
|
1:18:15 – 1:18:16
It was Malchiel, and I think it was Malchiel.
|
|
|
1:18:16 – 1:18:19
I think I'm concerned too, I know now.
|
|
|
1:18:19 – 1:18:23
But not exactly anymore. Memory protocol.
|
|
|
1:18:19 – 1:18:26
Protocol. I have my question, have you ever received a warning, Tanjus?
|
|
|
1:18:26 – 1:18:33
No, no warning, no advert. In the past, it was also when I was impulsive.
|
|
|
1:18:33 – 1:18:41
Somehow I got to know them through such media, there was already the thing that they e-mails
|
|
|
1:18:41 – 1:18:46
sent and said that this is now going to the police, there are complaints filed. To date
|
|
|
1:18:46 – 1:18:55
There was no notice, no warning, no letter from the lawyer. It was just unsubstantiated emails.
|
|
|
1:18:55 – 1:19:00
It may have been written with AI as well.
|
|
|
1:19:00 – 1:19:02
I find that interesting.
|
|
|
1:19:02 – 1:19:09
That's why I found this so funny when I was standing at the mailbox and this horny letter
|
|
|
1:19:09 – 1:19:17
I thought to myself "yey, post from Impulsiva" and then it was about the
|
|
|
1:19:17 – 1:19:22
The topic of lava. There I was a little bit, so my heart has already bled, I must say.
|
|
|
1:19:22 – 1:19:30
You were disappointed, and so were we. It was announced so big and nothing came.
|
|
|
1:19:30 – 1:19:38
There were also stories, where then stop, I'm now on the way because of this thing
|
|
|
1:19:38 – 1:19:46
somewhere and then they will get mail if they don't clarify it themselves
|
|
|
1:19:46 – 1:19:52
and so on. Yes, so my mailbox is still empty.
|
|
|
1:19:52 – 1:20:02
Yes, yawning emptiness, spider webs. So much for honesty and transparency. It will be
|
|
|
1:20:02 – 1:20:09
always things big announced at Impulsiva, but nothing happens and then these
|
|
|
1:20:09 – 1:20:13
Topics are also silent. We have already mentioned this in the last podcast or in
|
|
|
1:20:13 – 1:20:20
Previous stories on Instagram. This was all consistently hosted. I think Impulsiva thinks
|
|
|
1:20:20 – 1:20:27
Still, if you don't respond to something, it's no longer being addressed. But this is not
|
|
|
1:20:27 – 1:20:33
so. Especially since we also want to enlighten and she does so with others and
|
|
|
1:20:33 – 1:20:40
That's why we have to mention it. That corresponds to all the facts.
|
|
|
1:20:40 – 1:20:46
Exactly and I would like to hack into it again. It is not an arbitrary
|
|
|
1:20:46 – 1:20:50
Invoice. If I had written a bill now, I would have said it might have been a
|
|
|
1:20:50 – 1:20:57
used an image or an image of, a royalty-free image, which I did not hear at all, then would have
|
|
|
1:20:57 – 1:21:04
I still understand the uprising. But she has my property, my text, has used it,
|
|
|
1:21:04 – 1:21:11
There was a misrepresentation of the source, even if it was the source of Instagram. The
|
|
|
1:21:11 – 1:21:17
The article was only available on my website and nobody cares.
|
|
|
1:21:17 – 1:21:21
whether I can get to the website via the link on Instagram.
|
|
|
1:21:21 – 1:21:28
It has to be clearly defined where I got it from.
|
|
|
1:21:28 – 1:21:35
It's very important, I can take a text and can specify a source, that's good
|
|
|
1:21:35 – 1:21:36
and beautiful.
|
|
|
1:21:36 – 1:21:42
But where is your license to upload this article?
|
|
|
1:21:42 – 1:21:51
Because it doesn't matter whether she uses a source or not, whether the wrong one or the right one, she must have a license for it.
|
|
|
1:21:51 – 1:21:57
This means, for example, if I now use a picture from the German Press Agency
|
|
|
1:21:57 – 1:22:04
and I put a source, the photographer and dpa, it is not enough,
|
|
|
1:22:04 – 1:22:10
They will come and say "so and now we would have liked to see the license,
|
|
|
1:22:10 – 1:22:14
Do you have one, don't you? Okay, then comes a letter from the lawyer,
|
|
|
1:22:14 – 1:22:20
They are usually big and then they can pay and there you pay the picture,
|
|
|
1:22:20 – 1:22:29
the documentation is paid that it has been secured and the lawyer's fees. It can be in
|
|
|
1:22:29 – 1:22:36
300 Euro area go for a picture. So she should be a little careful if she pays for this,
|
|
|
1:22:36 – 1:22:42
the bill or if we'll see each other again in court. You will definitely continue,
|
|
|
1:22:42 – 1:22:46
Because that's also... I'll keep going. It is also your right, even as a company,
|
|
|
1:22:46 – 1:22:52
As an editor, not only Leon himself, but Thalnews in general is behind it, the company.
|
|
|
1:22:52 – 1:23:00
And not Leon as a private person. I think that impulsively forgets again and again in the place.
|
|
|
1:23:00 – 1:23:04
She also announced in her livestream today.
|
|
|
1:23:04 – 1:23:06
She will continue to fight against the woman.
|
|
|
1:23:06 – 1:23:13
So far, nothing has come. I don't have a letter,
|
|
|
1:23:13 – 1:23:16
You will not receive an email from your lawyer. Nothing.
|
|
|
1:23:16 – 1:23:23
This is because there were discrepancies with the collection service. She also wants
|
|
|
1:23:23 – 1:23:28
blaming you for it. I would like to mention another point. You're just
|
|
|
1:23:28 – 1:23:35
the client, but you can not influence, as for example, if there is
|
|
|
1:23:35 – 1:23:42
Mistakes come, which I won't confirm. You don't have a hand like that.
|
|
|
1:23:42 – 1:23:48
Debt collection service is working. For example, if mistakes happen there, you are not responsible for
|
|
|
1:23:48 – 1:23:54
in whatever form, but the collection service. She can't do you either
|
|
|
1:23:54 – 1:24:00
Then to blame for it. That's true. It's kind of like when I go into
|
|
|
1:24:00 – 1:24:07
I go for iced coffee, a kid throws my ice cream down next to me and I make the ice cream saleswoman
|
|
|
1:24:07 – 1:24:15
It's because she gave me the ice. She already has it in my hand
|
|
|
1:24:15 – 1:24:19
given, has already run. But I can't blame the ice cream vendor for that.
|
|
|
1:24:19 – 1:24:27
make. Maybe the ice cream saleswoman is nice and offers me a new grove of ice cream out of goodwill,
|
|
|
1:24:27 – 1:24:33
But she doesn't have to. But it's basically the same thing. You've got the debt collection service.
|
|
|
1:24:33 – 1:24:39
Nothing to do. You're just the principal. I also don't know if you're so aware of it.
|
|
|
1:24:39 – 1:24:45
and whether there were errors or not from the collection service, I do not know. This claims
|
|
|
1:24:45 – 1:24:53
Now, and without evidence or anything else, I'm not going to talk about it. You have to be like that
|
|
|
1:24:53 – 1:24:58
I question and refute them a little bit, because they really do.
|
|
|
1:24:58 – 1:25:04
I'm interested in how she wants to hold you accountable or Talnews. That's funny.
|
|
|
1:25:04 – 1:25:10
That's true. So I'm still wondering how she wants to hold me accountable.
|
|
|
1:25:10 – 1:25:17
Well, but Impulsiva talks a lot when the day is long, even for her followers. She must yes
|
|
|
1:25:17 – 1:25:22
polarizing and loud. Whether this is wise and well-founded, what she gives of herself, that is of course
|
|
|
1:25:22 – 1:25:28
on another sheet. But yes. I mean, she always has to set some frames.
|
|
|
1:25:28 – 1:25:41
She likes to put people in certain pictures, a certain frame. And she does it very loudly,
|
|
|
1:25:41 – 1:25:52
Very outrageous and yes, she likes to do that. And then to mention it again, to do that.
|
|
|
1:25:52 – 1:26:02
A lot of people would ask themselves, okay, but Talnews had a picture.
|
|
|
1:26:02 – 1:26:10
made public by Lavan, where the house can be seen. Yes, that's true, we did, but to
|
|
|
1:26:10 – 1:26:19
at a later stage, i.e. after the application for interim measures has been made.
|
|
|
1:26:19 – 1:26:28
Because as evidence, she has indicated our catalogue of questions and the post to the
|
|
|
1:26:28 – 1:26:40
Data scandal with Frank Gottermann, Impulsiva and Lava. This is attached as evidence. The
|
|
|
1:26:40 – 1:26:47
other articles were uploaded only after the request. Where did you know about this
|
|
|
1:26:47 – 1:26:54
Request at the time they came online? Not right now. So I didn't know. Only in
|
|
|
1:26:54 – 1:27:02
In hindsight, it was somehow said in a live interview that she had applied for a decision.
|
|
|
1:27:02 – 1:27:07
But at the moment I didn't even assume that she had applied for a decision against me as a person,
|
|
|
1:27:07 – 1:27:14
But against something else that she may have misinterpreted there in the bubble.
|
|
|
1:27:14 – 1:27:19
And that's why it came relatively like a blow from the head.
|
|
|
1:27:19 – 1:27:24
What people, I just want to say for a moment, yes, I don't know, because that's an important point,
|
|
|
1:27:24 – 1:27:32
If I go to court today and apply for something like this today, the person will not get this in the mailbox today.
|
|
|
1:27:32 – 1:27:38
It takes a few days for something like this to be delivered at all.
|
|
|
1:27:38 – 1:27:41
You mustn't forget that.
|
|
|
1:27:41 – 1:27:48
The letter way, it's not as if the lady in court immediately finishes this and immediately puts it in the mail.
|
|
|
1:27:48 – 1:27:50
It may also have processing days.
|
|
|
1:27:50 – 1:27:57
So suppose that would be processed two days in court, then goes out by mail
|
|
|
1:27:57 – 1:28:00
and arrives two days later.
|
|
|
1:28:00 – 1:28:05
If he notices himself, then you have it four days later as an example only in the mailbox.
|
|
|
1:28:05 – 1:28:10
And that's what almost happened there.
|
|
|
1:28:10 – 1:28:16
She makes the request, but you had no knowledge of it at all, because this letter
|
|
|
1:28:16 – 1:28:23
It was not yet delivered. So for rounding it off again.
|
|
|
1:28:23 – 1:28:30
To be clear, we posted a post on YouTube.
|
|
|
1:28:30 – 1:28:38
that TalNews or I have won the whole Chose through my lawyer and that it is there
|
|
|
1:28:38 – 1:28:48
There is more information. There was still research, and there were certain
|
|
|
1:28:48 – 1:28:55
Comments from her directly. She wrote that I won because she didn't have a lawyer.
|
|
|
1:28:55 – 1:29:04
The lawyer would have let her sit, that she didn't have any witnesses and that I didn't even
|
|
|
1:29:04 – 1:29:11
There would be great reporting. This may be true on a small point. me
|
|
|
1:29:11 – 1:29:19
Don't come to a station like WDR, Sat.1, RTL, RTL2. I don't want that either. I,
|
|
|
1:29:19 – 1:29:28
For Leon, for Thanius, we have different values. We're focusing on something else. And I knew
|
|
|
1:29:28 – 1:29:34
Exactly when we report that something great will come to light in some way.
|
|
|
1:29:34 – 1:29:43
And something has come to light, because she has tried, you have to keep that in mind here,
|
|
|
1:29:43 – 1:29:54
She's tried to hide that she's implanting an illegally ordered chip into a cat.
|
|
|
1:29:54 – 1:30:00
and then to say that she got a go from the vet, that she herself
|
|
|
1:30:00 – 1:30:06
can perform. God knows what could have happened. And I've really
|
|
|
1:30:06 – 1:30:14
Talk to animal rights activists. They said no vet in the world in Germany would do that.
|
|
|
1:30:14 – 1:30:23
allow. He would lose his license. Only one doctor is allowed, or in exceptions.
|
|
|
1:30:23 – 1:30:33
a medical professional. And then a little comment on the trial. There's
|
|
|
1:30:33 – 1:30:42
She asked me and the defender that we, as Thal News, as editors, should stop talking about it.
|
|
|
1:30:42 – 1:30:49
They will communicate publicly. Whether we can confirm this here. And there's my defender.
|
|
|
1:30:49 – 1:30:55
I said, no, we won't, because we don't know 100 percent if we won't talk about it again.
|
|
|
1:30:55 – 1:31:02
The whole thing will inform the public. And at this point I have to say if it
|
|
|
1:31:02 – 1:31:07
It is about animal welfare, because it always makes itself strong for it, I am of the opinion that
|
|
|
1:31:07 – 1:31:14
Sarah, that you should report on it very well and I also think Leon, if the matter
|
|
|
1:31:14 – 1:31:19
is big enough, maybe the WDR or a larger station will be interested in it and
|
|
|
1:31:19 – 1:31:26
Maybe the whole thing will get even bigger. We must not forget that this is about animal welfare.
|
|
|
1:31:26 – 1:31:35
Just like Lavan in the incubator raised eggs from the Aldi with the children. Who
|
|
|
1:31:35 – 1:31:41
Does it come up with such an idea? Yeah, and then there's keeping chickens and the big mistake, and there's
|
|
|
1:31:41 – 1:31:49
Again, the good lava is always, I say, an open paperback. It sends
|
|
|
1:31:49 – 1:31:57
constantly any pictures, addresses are called, phone numbers, chat histories, voice messages
|
|
|
1:31:57 – 1:32:04
And it always comes down to people who have something bad in mind. Yes, and that was it,
|
|
|
1:32:04 – 1:32:11
What I said earlier. She constantly feeds her critics or her haters with her
|
|
|
1:32:11 – 1:32:19
content itself. She shows the question catalogue in the live streams and there is totally open her address
|
|
|
1:32:19 – 1:32:27
to see. She goes, goes to the court and makes an urgent request that it stop
|
|
|
1:32:27 – 1:32:37
There is a food ban and a contact ban because she is afraid for her children, but constantly keeps her
|
|
|
1:32:37 – 1:32:43
Address on the Internet. Then she tells me that she hatched the eggs, that she hatched cats.
|
|
|
1:32:43 – 1:32:49
He flipped. That's not what anyone said about her. She does it all herself.
|
|
|
1:32:49 – 1:32:52
These are facts.
|
|
|
1:32:52 – 1:32:57
Yes, and then she is surprised that these topics are taken up.
|
|
|
1:32:57 – 1:33:02
On the one hand, that content creators talk about it and that maybe at some point the press
|
|
|
1:33:02 – 1:33:03
become aware of it.
|
|
|
1:33:03 – 1:33:07
Why are you telling this on the net?
|
|
|
1:33:07 – 1:33:15
That's what Impulsiva and Sam have here and also the Frank have already prepared it all
|
|
|
1:33:15 – 1:33:16
I had what happened there.
|
|
|
1:33:16 – 1:33:21
All two for different interests. One to add one to the other,
|
|
|
1:33:21 – 1:33:28
then the other to insert the one of the other and somehow the animal welfare remained
|
|
|
1:33:28 – 1:33:35
A bit on the track. And all of them. Yes, you can, stop Sam, you can just say,
|
|
|
1:33:35 – 1:33:43
It was animal welfare that came first. But it was somehow,
|
|
|
1:33:43 – 1:33:49
had all this a bit bitter aftertaste, if you look at all the livestreams and
|
|
|
1:33:49 – 1:33:58
I watched the videos about it. And LaVan builds the shit herself and then she gets upset about it,
|
|
|
1:33:58 – 1:34:05
Is it being reported? Yes, and now you are doing something for animal welfare by
|
|
|
1:34:05 – 1:34:11
Clarify the grievances. This is very important and perhaps also ensures to a certain extent that
|
|
|
1:34:11 – 1:34:18
that such people either get a ban on animal husbandry, but above all
|
|
|
1:34:18 – 1:34:25
No help center, counseling center are for people who keep animals. That can't be. Someone,
|
|
|
1:34:25 – 1:34:32
who deals with animals in this way and makes such blatant scandals, he has, in my opinion,
|
|
|
1:34:32 – 1:34:38
It is not lost in animal welfare and has no animals to keep. I can't do that. Sorry.
|
|
|
1:34:38 – 1:34:41
And then she wonders why this is being discussed.
|
|
|
1:34:41 – 1:34:50
Yes, then she also showed the balcony in a livestream, where also the chickens
|
|
|
1:34:50 – 1:34:55
At that time it was held, which today is an absolute cat El Dorado.
|
|
|
1:34:55 – 1:35:01
And well, that's just, if I were a cat, I'd be happy on this balcony.
|
|
|
1:35:01 – 1:35:06
So it's so nicely made and with scratching trees and so on.
|
|
|
1:35:06 – 1:35:12
But she shows the pictures of herself, she tells the stories.
|
|
|
1:35:12 – 1:35:20
Exactly and where you just sat balcony, I noticed a very important thing and
|
|
|
1:35:20 – 1:35:29
She has a cat pool for her cats. And just before she did this live,
|
|
|
1:35:29 – 1:35:34
We were told something and then we talked about it and said,
|
|
|
1:35:34 – 1:35:40
Cat and dog swimming pools are full cooling or underestimated risk.
|
|
|
1:35:40 – 1:35:44
Because a lot can happen, even if it's a small pelvis,
|
|
|
1:35:44 – 1:35:46
As seen in the livestream.
|
|
|
1:35:46 – 1:35:50
The animals could die.
|
|
|
1:35:50 – 1:35:55
But then I would have said, there would have been at most a kitten drink place in the pool.
|
|
|
1:35:55 – 1:35:58
That's right, from the square.
|
|
|
1:35:58 – 1:36:02
I mean, there were three water balls in there, so small,
|
|
|
1:36:02 – 1:36:04
The pelvis was almost full.
|
|
|
1:36:04 – 1:36:11
So I found that really creepy everything. So my personal opinion.
|
|
|
1:36:11 – 1:36:18
In general, however, I think she has to listen to these accusations,
|
|
|
1:36:18 – 1:36:24
because she herself made it available to the public. And when I'm an
|
|
|
1:36:24 – 1:36:34
Misconduct, where I harm other living beings with it, then it should also be there.
|
|
|
1:36:34 – 1:36:41
Please take action to protect the animals at the end of the day.
|
|
|
1:36:41 – 1:36:47
And that's why I would recommend you to continue and everyone else, of course,
|
|
|
1:36:47 – 1:36:49
who are committed to animal welfare.
|
|
|
1:36:49 – 1:36:53
Yes, that's contradictory.
|
|
|
1:36:53 – 1:36:57
And there would have to be an insight from a lava.
|
|
|
1:36:57 – 1:37:02
But instead, she only positions herself in the role of victim.
|
|
|
1:37:02 – 1:37:06
But you can see zero insight into their content.
|
|
|
1:37:06 – 1:37:10
Yes, if you also watch the livestream, which was now a few days ago
|
|
|
1:37:10 – 1:37:13
Or even yesterday, look at it,
|
|
|
1:37:14 – 1:37:21
how she spoke in rage and made such a real all-round deal with different people.
|
|
|
1:37:21 – 1:37:27
That had been fierce. Like I said, 50 times Elli.
|
|
|
1:37:27 – 1:37:35
I mean, she didn't say a good word to Bernie, to Thalnews and everyone else.
|
|
|
1:37:35 – 1:37:38
That was fierce.
|
|
|
1:37:38 – 1:37:48
And you just have to imagine that, she's on her mailbox, here I read it now,
|
|
|
1:37:48 – 1:37:55
Wunder Maus Wunderhaus volunteer care places for kittens.
|
|
|
1:37:55 – 1:37:58
Okay, she can do it, no problem.
|
|
|
1:37:58 – 1:38:05
In her ad online in the animal worlds at snouts.de, however, she clearly writes that she
|
|
|
1:38:05 – 1:38:09
I would like to be a volunteer nurse.
|
|
|
1:38:09 – 1:38:11
What now?
|
|
|
1:38:11 – 1:38:13
Do you want or is she one?
|
|
|
1:38:13 – 1:38:18
I'll put this in the room.
|
|
|
1:38:18 – 1:38:26
Larvan, are you a volunteer nurse for kittens and cats or do you want a
|
|
|
1:38:26 – 1:38:32
be, because the Animal Welfare Association Oberhausen has with you directly after that to the light
|
|
|
1:38:32 – 1:38:41
The accusations came, they immediately broke off contact with you and they said
|
|
|
1:38:41 – 1:38:49
We don't want anything to do with it. How do you know that? Was there an opinion on animal welfare?
|
|
|
1:38:49 – 1:38:54
Exactly there was a statement from the Animal Welfare Association Oberhausen. I also have
|
|
|
1:38:54 – 1:38:57
I asked again if I could publish the email. This was unfortunately
|
|
|
1:38:57 – 1:39:03
No, but I assure you, this email exists. That the
|
|
|
1:39:03 – 1:39:07
Animal Welfare Association Oberhausen has said, after the incidents we have the
|
|
|
1:39:07 – 1:39:13
Contact with Lahwann completely discontinued.
|
|
|
1:39:13 – 1:39:21
And she is also quasi for Duisburg-Neumühl and Oberhausen she is
|
|
|
1:39:21 – 1:39:29
burned. She's on a blacklist with her name. She won't be in a nursing home.
|
|
|
1:39:29 – 1:39:36
More to come in. I mean, that's what Impulsiva and SEM have for.
|
|
|
1:39:36 – 1:39:44
Animal welfare and so on, and have provided the information. Yes, that must
|
|
|
1:39:44 – 1:39:50
I also mention positively at this point. But what you have to say negatively is what you have to say negatively.
|
|
|
1:39:50 – 1:39:57
In the end, it was made into a show by Impulsiva. And then when I go and remove all
|
|
|
1:39:57 – 1:40:04
Content that I have made in this regard, again from the net, then my commitment was
|
|
|
1:40:04 – 1:40:09
Almost for the cats. Except that they have at least informed the animal welfare,
|
|
|
1:40:09 – 1:40:15
At least something. And I'd be personally interested, and now I'm judging the
|
|
|
1:40:15 – 1:40:22
Question to Impulsiva. Do you have an answer
|
|
|
1:40:22 – 1:40:25
the Veterinary Office of Duisburg
|
|
|
1:40:25 – 1:40:28
where did you get the request or where did you get the request
|
|
|
1:40:28 – 1:40:31
Sent? Is there an opinion
|
|
|
1:40:31 – 1:40:34
from the Duisburg Veterinary Office? I would have
|
|
|
1:40:34 – 1:40:34
I'd love to see you.
|
|
|
1:40:34 – 1:40:41
So according to our information have
|
|
|
1:40:41 – 1:40:43
Several people on the videos
|
|
|
1:40:41 – 1:40:46
co-researched. So it wasn't just Impulsiva, Sam and other people were involved.
|
|
|
1:40:46 – 1:40:53
Yes and since Impulsiva, I have to say unfortunately now, actually other people like
|
|
|
1:40:53 – 1:40:59
because she wants to have nothing to do with many things herself, with administration and
|
|
|
1:40:59 – 1:41:07
The distribution of tasks, but rather people like to delegate, I also doubt that they themselves
|
|
|
1:41:07 – 1:41:13
They may have asked such questions. But I don't know. It's just a guess.
|
|
|
1:41:13 – 1:41:21
Yes, the problem is, she won't get any information either because of data protection. Would
|
|
|
1:41:21 – 1:41:26
If you use your press card now, it may well be. But since the
|
|
|
1:41:26 – 1:41:33
Press card, which she probably has possible, from a non-reputable association or even the
|
|
|
1:41:33 – 1:41:41
Council card, which associations may issue, it does not have and there it will not make any statements
|
|
|
1:41:41 – 1:41:48
Get or take a position. It must be said that this Council card, which is from the
|
|
|
1:41:48 – 1:41:56
German Press Council and it has extremely harsh conditions. You have to be at least 51%.
|
|
|
1:41:56 – 1:42:05
Generate your income from journalistic activities. And a few others
|
|
|
1:42:05 – 1:42:14
Things. So this is going to be difficult. It's really difficult, yes. Since they are not an editor either
|
|
|
1:42:14 – 1:42:21
As a result, it is even more difficult to prove it. She must have a proof of salary
|
|
|
1:42:21 – 1:42:27
She has to prove and she has to prove publications and this includes her YouTube appearance, which she
|
|
|
1:42:27 – 1:42:35
put there. Definitely not in this form. And there you have to do certain other things,
|
|
|
1:42:35 – 1:42:43
You just have to keep certain things. You have to follow a press code and
|
|
|
1:42:43 – 1:42:53
This press code is not available on uncensored and outrageous Impulsiva's Youtube account.
|
|
|
1:42:53 – 1:42:55
Yes, it is not applicable there.
|
|
|
1:42:55 – 1:42:57
No.
|
|
|
1:42:57 – 1:42:59
Yeah, that's the way it is.
|
|
|
1:42:59 – 1:43:01
The language alone.
|
|
|
1:43:01 – 1:43:03
That's true.
|
|
|
1:43:03 – 1:43:05
It's not just the language, it's the whole thing.
|
|
|
1:43:05 – 1:43:07
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:43:07 – 1:43:10
Total appearance.
|
|
|
1:43:10 – 1:43:12
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:43:12 – 1:43:15
Your way of researching,
|
|
|
1:43:15 – 1:43:17
their way of working,
|
|
|
1:43:17 – 1:43:19
Gestures, facial expressions, their way of speaking,
|
|
|
1:43:19 – 1:43:21
Everything doesn't fit in there.
|
|
|
1:43:21 – 1:43:23
I have one more,
|
|
|
1:43:23 – 1:43:26
I have a few more questions
|
|
|
1:43:26 – 1:43:28
to Empol Siva, and if she
|
|
|
1:43:28 – 1:43:30
is such a friend of the catalogue of questions,
|
|
|
1:43:30 – 1:43:33
Because she accuses me of it,
|
|
|
1:43:33 – 1:43:35
How can Thalnius have one?
|
|
|
1:43:35 – 1:43:41
send a 14-page letter to LaVern, but send one yourself in return,
|
|
|
1:43:41 – 1:43:48
I don't know how many pages letter, 5 to Frank, to our Frankie from the Allgäu,
|
|
|
1:43:48 – 1:43:55
then I ask you now so, how would it be, if I as an editor you a question catalog
|
|
|
1:43:55 – 1:44:00
To send that I, I have a few questions and would like to get them answered.
|
|
|
1:44:00 – 1:44:02
What do you think of it?
|
|
|
1:44:02 – 1:44:12
So dear Impulsiva, we would welcome that as an honest, transparent person you pretend to be on your channel,
|
|
|
1:44:12 – 1:44:17
You might want to ask yourself these questions and answer them.
|
|
|
1:44:17 – 1:44:25
You want to be authentic, make authentic content, then just like to start with it.
|
|
|
1:44:25 – 1:44:29
So take the question.
|
|
|
1:44:29 – 1:44:36
Or as they would say in Cologne, if you have eggs, you accept them.
|
|
|
1:44:36 – 1:44:40
Was that good? I hope so.
|
|
|
1:44:40 – 1:44:44
Yeah, that was good and loud.
|
|
|
1:44:44 – 1:44:47
Thank you, thank you, thank you. I went to great lengths.
|
|
|
1:44:47 – 1:44:58
I've been torn back and forth a little bit. On the one hand, of course, this
|
|
|
1:44:58 – 1:45:04
Answers are interesting, on the other hand I know exactly, on Sunday the topic will be
|
|
|
1:45:04 – 1:45:13
It will be ridiculed and ridiculed. Of course. Yes, that's also
|
|
|
1:45:13 – 1:45:21
Her only way to deal with it is by trying to make herself bigger and make things ridiculous.
|
|
|
1:45:21 – 1:45:26
But she doesn't answer questions and doesn't give answers.
|
|
|
1:45:26 – 1:45:32
That's just the thing. That's their way of dealing with it.
|
|
|
1:45:32 – 1:45:37
Topics that concern them, glide, rise above others, make fun of themselves
|
|
|
1:45:37 – 1:45:42
and bombard other people with accusations that are mostly baseless.
|
|
|
1:45:42 – 1:45:55
Yes, people are framed, placed in a framework that underlines their opinion, their interests.
|
|
|
1:45:55 – 1:46:02
This is evident in all communication to the outside world. Be it on Instagram or YouTube.
|
|
|
1:46:02 – 1:46:09
But this is not how you work transparently, if you only report narrowly and one-sidedly, dear Impulsiva.
|
|
|
1:46:09 – 1:46:17
What kind of demands have been made on us? Where we should speak,
|
|
|
1:46:17 – 1:46:21
what we should put right, where we should go into it and so on and so forth.
|
|
|
1:46:21 – 1:46:25
But interestingly, that doesn't happen on their side at all.
|
|
|
1:46:25 – 1:46:31
So we're really looking forward to it. I would bet,
|
|
|
1:46:31 – 1:46:33
She didn't answer the questions and now she's happy.
|
|
|
1:46:33 – 1:46:41
Yes, I am also of the opinion, my personality, the questions will not answer them. And also
|
|
|
1:46:41 – 1:46:46
We also give Lavan another chance. Lavan, you have our email address, you have
|
|
|
1:46:46 – 1:46:55
our phone number, you can write and you can also send the questionnaire. me
|
|
|
1:46:55 – 1:47:01
can also send it to you again in simple language, if that is desired, because these
|
|
|
1:47:01 – 1:47:10
Language, which is used there in the questionnaire, is already an upscale language, so very much in the
|
|
|
1:47:10 – 1:47:18
Legal style. And we're not going to let go of that. The lawyer in the
|
|
|
1:47:18 – 1:47:26
Court hearing said. You can complain, you can take action against the publications,
|
|
|
1:47:26 – 1:47:31
then you must submit a cease-and-desist declaration to the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf or Cologne.
|
|
|
1:47:31 – 1:47:37
I wonder if she'll do that. I don't think so because she has now
|
|
|
1:47:37 – 1:47:43
Lawyer's fees, court costs on the neck. That's the first time she's served.
|
|
|
1:47:43 – 1:47:48
They have to be paid first.
|
|
|
1:47:48 – 1:47:49
Exactly.
|
|
|
1:47:49 – 1:47:56
And I don't think it's that easy for a woman with children.
|
|
|
1:47:56 – 1:47:58
That's true.
|
|
|
1:47:58 – 1:48:02
Yes, media law is a very expensive matter.
|
|
|
1:48:02 – 1:48:06
That's true. One should secure oneself there.
|
|
|
1:48:06 – 1:48:14
It is best to take out professional liability insurance.
|
|
|
1:48:14 – 1:48:20
Yes, there are. They're not even that expensive.
|
|
|
1:48:20 – 1:48:23
They also make sense above all else.
|
|
|
1:48:23 – 1:48:28
Not everyone gets it. That's the other thing.
|
|
|
1:48:28 – 1:48:31
An establishment must be registered.
|
|
|
1:48:31 – 1:48:37
That's right. Of course, you also have to register a company first.
|
|
|
1:48:37 – 1:48:40
That's what it looks like.
|
|
|
1:48:40 – 1:48:49
Yes, then we thank you very much for turning on today and hopefully good
|
|
|
1:48:49 – 1:49:00
Listen to what Leon von Talnews had to say. And likes to switch to the next
|
|
|
1:49:00 – 1:49:09
Once again on the self-producer's file. Or at Rektal Digital or Lautfunk. Or
|
|
|
1:49:09 – 1:49:18
I also love Talnews, the good Leon. I would be very happy. Because there are also
|
|
|
1:49:18 – 1:49:26
Always one or the other exciting articles and stories. I think you guys do podcasts, too.
|
|
|
1:49:26 – 1:49:33
ne? Yeah, in between. I mean, you have to flush something in the feed one time or another
|
|
|
1:49:33 – 1:49:40
became. If you liked what you saw, you can like the video.
|
|
|
1:49:40 – 1:49:47
Leave a comment or like to hyp. We are also happy about criticism. Yours
|
|
|
1:49:47 – 1:49:55
you are welcome to participate in the comments and also like to express criticism, as long as it is factual
|
|
|
1:49:55 – 1:50:06
Contributes to the context. That's right, I'd say goodbye.
|
|
|
1:50:06 – 1:50:08
Farewell to you!
|
|
|
1:50:09 – 1:50:14
Hello, hello, welcome to uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:50:14 – 1:50:16
So, hey, wimp
|
|
|
1:50:16 – 1:50:18
Now someone is being publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:50:18 – 1:50:22
Disassembled? What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:50:22 – 1:50:24
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:50:24 – 1:50:26
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:50:26 – 1:50:32
Just hate in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:50:32 – 1:50:34
Uncensored and outrageous, no, obsessively forward
|
|
|
1:50:34 – 1:50:37
When it becomes a permanent loop, they call it a discussion.
|
|
|
1:50:37 – 1:50:42
[Music]
|
|
|
1:50:42 – 1:50:47
[Music]
|
|
|
1:50:47 – 1:50:52
[Music]
|
|
|
1:50:52 – 1:50:57
[Music]
|
|
|
1:50:57 – 1:51:02
[Music]
|
|
|
1:51:02 – 1:51:12
[Music]
|
|
|
1:51:12 – 1:51:19
Hello, hello, welcome to us sensual and outrageous
|
|
|
1:51:19 – 1:51:24
So, go away, now someone will be publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:51:24 – 1:51:28
What's that supposed to be? What's that supposed to be? What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:51:28 – 1:51:30
No, but there, but there, no
|
|
|
1:51:30 – 1:51:32
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:51:32 – 1:51:35
Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:51:35 – 1:51:38
Indecent and outrageous
|
|
|
1:51:38 – 1:51:41
No, obsessively burned
|
|
|
1:51:41 – 1:51:43
When sport becomes a perpetual grind
|
|
|
1:51:43 – 1:51:45
You call it
|
|
|
1:51:45 – 1:51:47
discussion
|
|
|
1:51:47 – 1:52:16
[Music]
|
|
|
1:52:16 – 1:52:20
Hello, hello, hello, hello
|
|
|
1:52:20 – 1:52:22
Welcome to us sensing
|
|
|
1:52:22 – 1:52:26
And outrageous
|
|
|
1:52:26 – 1:52:29
So, so, so, cell phone away
|
|
|
1:52:29 – 1:52:32
Now someone is being publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:52:32 – 1:52:33
disassembled
|
|
|
1:52:33 – 1:52:34
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:52:34 – 1:52:36
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:52:36 – 1:52:39
I'm not brave, I'm not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:52:39 – 1:52:42
Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:52:42 – 1:52:44
Sensitive and outrageous
|
|
|
1:52:44 – 1:52:47
My fruit is the truth, the word works to perpetual liquor,
|
|
|
1:52:47 – 1:52:48
You call it discussion.
|
|
|
1:52:48 – 1:53:11
Welcome to us, sensual and outrageous.
|
|
|
1:53:13 – 1:53:17
So cell phone away, now someone will open again, disassembled
|
|
|
1:53:17 – 1:53:19
De-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de
|
|
|
1:53:19 – 1:53:22
What's that supposed to be? What's that supposed to be? What's that supposed to be? What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:53:22 – 1:53:24
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:53:24 – 1:53:28
Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:53:28 – 1:53:30
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:53:30 – 1:53:32
Only one incessant trade port to the loop
|
|
|
1:53:32 – 1:53:34
We're an animal, it's a discussion.
|
|
|
1:53:34 – 1:53:46
Hello, hello, hello, hello Welcome to Uncensored and Outrageous
|
|
|
1:53:46 – 1:53:50
So, cell phone away, now someone is publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:53:50 – 1:53:51
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:53:51 – 1:53:52
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:53:52 – 1:53:53
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:53:53 – 1:53:54
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:53:54 – 1:54:00
Not brave, not uncomfortable Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:54:01 – 1:54:03
Uncensored and outrageous, no
|
|
|
1:54:03 – 1:54:05
Obsessive, harant, if it turns into a loop
|
|
|
1:54:05 – 1:54:07
Name here until discussion
|
|
|
1:54:07 – 1:54:14
H-H-H-H-Hello, hello
|
|
|
1:54:14 – 1:54:17
Welcome to us, she outrageously emphasizes us
|
|
|
1:54:23 – 1:54:25
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:54:25 – 1:54:27
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:54:27 – 1:54:28
What isn't that?
|
|
|
1:54:28 – 1:54:30
I don't think it's uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:54:30 – 1:54:33
Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:54:33 – 1:54:35
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:54:35 – 1:54:37
No, obsessive lap tip
|
|
|
1:54:37 – 1:54:40
So perpetually confused, it absolves discussion
|
|
|
1:54:42 – 1:54:46
Hello, Hello, welcome to uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:54:46 – 1:54:49
So, so, so, so, so, so, so, cell phone away
|
|
|
1:54:49 – 1:54:52
Now someone is being publicly disintegrated again
|
|
|
1:54:52 – 1:54:56
What's that supposed to be? What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:54:56 – 1:54:59
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:54:59 – 1:55:03
Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:55:03 – 1:55:05
Uncensored and outrageous, no
|
|
|
1:55:05 – 1:55:08
Obsessive, persistent, appearing in the gross continuous loop
|
|
|
1:55:08 – 1:55:09
Now there is discussion
|
|
|
1:55:09 – 1:55:15
Hello, hello, welcome to us sensual and outrageous
|
|
|
1:55:15 – 1:55:19
So, so, so, so, so, so, so, cell phone away
|
|
|
1:55:19 – 1:55:21
Now someone is being publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:55:21 – 1:55:23
Disassembled, disassembled, disassembled, disassembled
|
|
|
1:55:23 – 1:55:24
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:55:24 – 1:55:26
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:55:26 – 1:55:29
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:55:29 – 1:55:31
Only old hatred in the livestream
|
|
|
1:55:31 – 1:55:33
And the system comes, comes, comes, comes
|
|
|
1:55:33 – 1:55:35
Unsensed and outrageous
|
|
|
1:55:37 – 1:55:39
Auction, auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:39 – 1:55:41
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:41 – 1:55:43
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:43 – 1:55:45
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:45 – 1:55:47
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:47 – 1:55:49
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:49 – 1:55:51
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:51 – 1:55:53
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:53 – 1:55:55
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:55 – 1:55:57
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:57 – 1:55:59
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:55:59 – 1:56:01
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:56:01 – 1:56:03
Auction, auction, auction
|
|
|
1:56:03 – 1:56:05
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:56:05 – 1:56:07
My Inclusive Hand Fence Cleaning
|
|
|
1:56:07 – 1:56:09
Zutau loop in the
|
|
|
1:56:09 – 1:56:11
Is discussion
|
|
|
1:56:11 – 1:56:15
Hey, hello, hello, welcome to
|
|
|
1:56:15 – 1:56:17
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:56:17 – 1:56:19
So, so, so, so, so
|
|
|
1:56:19 – 1:56:21
Cell phone gone, now it'll be back
|
|
|
1:56:21 – 1:56:23
Someone publicly dismantled
|
|
|
1:56:23 – 1:56:25
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:56:25 – 1:56:27
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:56:27 – 1:56:29
I am not brave,
|
|
|
1:56:29 – 1:56:31
Not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:56:31 – 1:56:34
Old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:56:34 – 1:56:36
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:56:36 – 1:56:37
No, obsessively persists
|
|
|
1:56:37 – 1:56:39
In Spotted Blue Loop
|
|
|
1:56:39 – 1:56:41
Do you have a misdiscussion
|
|
|
1:56:41 – 1:56:44
Hey, hey, hello, hello
|
|
|
1:56:44 – 1:56:47
Welcome to Uncensored and Outrageous
|
|
|
1:56:47 – 1:56:50
So, so, cell phone away
|
|
|
1:56:50 – 1:56:53
Now someone is being publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:56:53 – 1:56:56
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:56:56 – 1:56:58
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:56:58 – 1:57:00
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:57:00 – 1:57:07
Only old hatred in the livestream system And uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:57:07 – 1:57:10
No, obzis them driving when tip becomes blue loop,
|
|
|
1:57:10 – 1:57:12
There's a discussion with you
|
|
|
1:57:12 – 1:57:15
And uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:57:15 – 1:57:18
No, obzis them driving when tip becomes blue loop,
|
|
|
1:57:18 – 1:57:20
There's a discussion with you
|
|
|
1:57:21 – 1:57:27
Hello, hello, welcome to uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:57:27 – 1:57:33
Mobile phone staggers, now someone is publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:57:33 – 1:57:36
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:57:36 – 1:57:40
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:57:40 – 1:57:44
Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:57:44 – 1:57:47
Uncensored and outrageous, no
|
|
|
1:57:47 – 1:57:49
obsessive, haram, fenst, sizzling, constant loop
|
|
|
1:57:49 – 1:57:51
Wild, do you call it a discussion?
|
|
|
1:57:55 – 1:57:59
H-h-hello, hello, welcome to uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:57:59 – 1:58:06
I do so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so cell phone away, now is dismantled behind someone publicly
|
|
|
1:58:06 – 1:58:09
What's that for?
|
|
|
1:58:09 – 1:58:12
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:58:12 – 1:58:20
Not brave, not uncomfortable Only old hatred in the live stream system
|
|
|
1:58:21 – 1:58:23
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:58:23 – 1:58:26
Obsessive, related when God becomes a perpetual loop
|
|
|
1:58:26 – 1:58:28
Nice, jellis discussion
|
|
|
1:58:28 – 1:58:31
Hello, hello
|
|
|
1:58:31 – 1:58:34
Welcome to Uncensored and Incomprehensible
|
|
|
1:58:34 – 1:58:37
So, cell phone away
|
|
|
1:58:37 – 1:58:40
Guys, will anyone be there in public again?
|
|
|
1:58:40 – 1:58:43
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:58:43 – 1:58:45
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
1:58:45 – 1:58:48
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:58:50 – 1:58:51
Live stream system
|
|
|
1:58:51 – 1:58:52
On, am, am, am, am
|
|
|
1:58:52 – 1:58:54
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:58:54 – 1:58:55
No, obcessively rammed
|
|
|
1:58:55 – 1:58:57
When it's under continuous loop
|
|
|
1:58:57 – 1:58:58
Call us discussion
|
|
|
1:58:58 – 1:59:00
On, am, am, am, am
|
|
|
1:59:00 – 1:59:01
The, the, the, the, the
|
|
|
1:59:01 – 1:59:03
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:59:03 – 1:59:04
No, obcessively rammed
|
|
|
1:59:04 – 1:59:06
When it's under continuous loop
|
|
|
1:59:06 – 1:59:08
Call us discussion
|
|
|
1:59:08 – 1:59:10
On, am, am, am, am
|
|
|
1:59:10 – 1:59:11
The, the, the, the, the
|
|
|
1:59:11 – 1:59:12
Hello, hello
|
|
|
1:59:12 – 1:59:13
Welcome to us
|
|
|
1:59:13 – 1:59:15
Uncensored and outrageous
|
|
|
1:59:16 – 1:59:21
So so, cell phone away, now someone is publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:59:21 – 1:59:26
So like that, that's what or be
|
|
|
1:59:26 – 1:59:29
Not brave, not uncomfortable
|
|
|
1:59:29 – 1:59:33
Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
1:59:33 – 1:59:36
Uncensored and outrageous, my obsessive errant
|
|
|
1:59:36 – 1:59:40
The short power loop is menet, destruction
|
|
|
1:59:43 – 1:59:46
Welcome to us in trembling and fashion
|
|
|
1:59:46 – 1:59:52
Cell phone gone, someone will be publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
1:59:52 – 1:59:55
And with us the name of the Prater says, what is that?
|
|
|
1:59:55 – 1:59:57
What, what should be?
|
|
|
1:59:57 – 2:00:00
Not courageous and not undisputed
|
|
|
2:00:00 - 2:00:03
Just old hatred, maybe stream system
|
|
|
2:00:03 – 2:00:06
To us in trembling and giving
|
|
|
2:00:06 – 2:00:08
No, if they're negotiating them, please loop
|
|
|
2:00:08 – 2:00:11
Feeding, let's call it discussion
|
|
|
2:00:11 – 2:00:22
Welcome to Uncensored and Outrageous
|
|
|
2:00:22 – 2:00:26
So, cell phone away Now someone is publicly dismantled again
|
|
|
2:00:26 – 2:00:29
What's that supposed to be?
|
|
|
2:00:29 – 2:00:37
Not brave, not uncomfortable Only old hatred in the livestream system
|
|
|
2:00:37 – 2:00:43
Uncensored and outrageous, no obsessive, burned when bread becomes a permanent loop
|
|
|
2:00:43 – 2:00:45
Do you call it discussion?
|
|
|
2:00:45 – 2:01:08
[Music]
|
It was time again: We take off the velvet gloves completely and dissect the drama surrounding YouTube ‘animal protection’, failed judicial bluffs and the chronic double standard of a totally overwhelmed bubble.. This episode features Leon von TalNews, which exclusively and in detail unpacks what really happened behind the scenes and in the courtroom.
What happens if you can no longer control the consequences of your own online trading? One flees collectively into the victim role, serves adventurous stories to the judiciary and ultimately fails crashingly at the harsh reality.
The file numbers of this episode:
- The courtroom showdown: How the injunction against TalNews collapsed in seconds and why Lawan got entangled in absurd Rewe vs. Aldi contradictions before the judge.
- The legal aftermath: Lying under oath? The background to the alleged false affidavit and why the Chose now lies with the public prosecutor's office.
- The chipping scandal: The truth about the 14-page catalogue of questions, illegal chipping actions on cats in their own construction and why official animal welfare associations have completely broken off contact.
- The debt collection file Impulsiva: How an unlicensed text copy of TalNews ended up in the order for payment procedure and why there was a sudden attempt in court to hastily settle debts with cash on hand.
- The fairy tale of the press card: A ruthless analysis of press codes, baseless AI-generated threat emails and worthless documents from the Internet.
- The spiral of escalation: Why some creators are completely overwhelmed with real life, get lost in pathological details and you would actually have to turn off the WLAN for self-protection.
Mercilessly analytical, fact-based and as usual without filters.
Stream now and join in the discussion! How do you see the case? Let us have your feedback in the comments – as long as it remains factual and contributes to the context. Don't forget to like, share and subscribe to the channel!
📋 Topics Outline:
Part 1: The Prelude & The Origin of Chaos
- Musical intro & Editorial update: ‘Uncensored and outrageous’ parody and the solemn recovery from male flu.
- The spark in the net: How Lawan exposed himself through his own live streams regarding animal welfare and which creators jumped up first.
- The investigative search for traces: The address research on snouts.de and why the TalNews dispatcher on site did not know who he was photographing.
Part 2: The questionnaire & The escape to the police
- The 14-page WhatsApp shock: Delivery of the questionnaire at 5:30 p.m. and Lawan's panicked five-time call during Leon's working hours.
- The nucleus of the file: What was in the letter – from illegal chipping actions to messie states to invented trademark rights.
- The phone call & The blockade: Good advice on data economy, the defiance response via text message and the final WhatsApp block.
- The Blocked Commissioner: Lawan's nocturnal gang to the criminal police and why the head of department immediately stopped the proceedings for lack of crime.
Part 3: The Judiciary Crime & The Bubble Dynamics
- Post from the judicial officer: The yellow envelope reaches the editors – content: The absurd prohibition of rapprochement in the urgent procedure.
- The affidavit: Why the decision went through at all and how Lawan falsely swore to have seen Leon personally at the house.
- The big deletion in the background: How Impulsiva hastily removed incriminating material under the pretext of ‘child protection’, while Frank demanded reflection time.
- The fairy tale of the press card: Leon dismantles Impulsiva’s claim about her ‘association card’ and explains the hard hurdles of the genuine press code.
Part 4: The day of reckoning in the courtroom
- Guards and personal protection: Why Leon appeared in the Duisburg court for fear of physical assaults of the bubble with guard protection.
- Pulse vein in the red area: The arrival of the parties and the first shock for Lawan, because her lawyer was allegedly stuck in Cologne.
- Rewe v Aldi before Judge Ehrweiler: How the applicant got entangled in massive contradictions on the witness stand and had to deny the existence of eyewitnesses.
- The total surrender: The hectic, dictated withdrawal of the interim order at the end of the trial.
Part 5: Foreplay, debt collection & The phenomenon of double standards
- ‘Schätschibitti’ and the love delusion: How Lawan reacted to TikTok after the trial, disguised voices and accused Leon of a romantic obsession.
- The debt collection file Impulsiva: The history of text theft at TalNews, ignored reminders and the dubious attempt at cash payment on the hand.
- Copyright warning bluffs: Why Leon's mailbox remains empty despite big announcements and how professional quotation and licensing law really works.
- The blacklist of animal welfare: The official (but secret) statement of the Tierschutzverein Oberhausen and the final conclusion about the total loss of control in the net.
Links to the issue:
Advertising:
Related episodes:
Contributors to this episode
Leon Wagemann
Sarah
Sascha
Playing time: 2:01:09
Date of admission: 03.06.26
This episode is from season 4, there are a total of 4 seasons.
One According to Funk Publication Cartel Production - Where stories are transmitted unmistakably.
Podcast license:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Note: This post contains affiliate links. If you shop through these links, I'll get a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Related posts
Discover more from LautFunk Podcast & Blog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Author: Sascha Markmann
Sascha Markmann is a creative mind with a moving biography: Computer scientist, philosopher, religious scholar and psychologist – and at the same time a person who has rediscovered life after a stroke. After working as a paramedic and elderly caregiver, Sascha found his way into the world of creative expression: As a blogger, musician, podcaster, philosopher and visual storyteller, he combines technical know-how with emotional depth and an oblique sense of humor. His contributions are somewhere between borderline, acid bassline and assistance – honestly, directly and with a wink. Guiding principle: “Audio-visual dullness with no usefulness – but perhaps that's why it's so valuable.” View all posts by Sascha Markmann
English
Hallo hier ist Leon von TALNEWS, danke für das nette Gespräch. Immer wieder gerne! 🙂