According to Funk Podcast & Blog

Format	size	Download
MP3 Audio	82 MB	Download
AAC m4a	42 MB	Download

transcript
00:00 - 0:00:19 [Music]
0:00:19 – 0:00:22 Rectal digital
0:00:22 – 0:00:28 Welcome to Rektal Digital, the file "Flattermann Episode 4".
0:00:28 – 0:00:31 The podcast for anyone who thinks while scrolling.
0:00:31 – 0:00:33 What the hell did I just see?
0:00:33 – 0:00:41 This week Lina explains things again, this time with mirrored illustration and subsequent overlay.
0:00:41 – 0:00:49 And then she is terrified by a statement by Sascha in TikTok Live with Julia, which he had literally quoted from a Lina video.
0:00:49 – 0:00:54 Wrongly understood, wrongly corrected, but most importantly outraged!
0:00:54 – 0:01:00 We are once again the followers who do everything just for clicks and still appear in their content like unguided truths.
0:01:00 – 0:01:02 It's ironic. It's up and running.
0:01:02 – 0:01:09 In the Maren livestream they wanted to talk about the key-generated music of Hotte.
0:01:09 – 0:01:15 The result was a miserable evening about Hater with Hotte and Malki in permanent nick mode.
0:01:15 – 0:01:17 Finally, the advice to Frank.
0:01:17 – 0:01:21 No more reactions, no more jokes, just stay calm.
0:01:21 – 0:01:23 But calm is not clickable.
0:01:23 – 0:01:30 Trashtime, me and Yvonne provide evidence and screenshots
0:01:30 – 0:01:33 While the stream prefers to be twisted and omitted
0:01:33 – 0:01:35 Well-known games, new round
0:01:35 – 0:01:40 And then, the flatterer of the week
0:01:40 – 0:01:43 With Sunday foreign shame at its best
0:01:43 – 0:01:47 Cuddling, pups talk, cut penis details
0:01:47 – 0:01:51 Ex-Truesto and Christine, who have Broken Heart Syndrome
0:01:51 – 0:01:54 It is confused with sudden cardiac arrest.
0:01:54 – 0:01:56 Finally.
0:01:56 – 0:01:58 Frank walks 800 meters past the clinic,
0:01:58 – 0:02:00 He misses his surgery because he sees very little.
0:02:00 – 0:02:03 A taxi is not an option.
0:02:03 – 0:02:05 because of allegedly no card payment.
0:02:05 – 0:02:08 Google says it does exist.
0:02:08 – 0:02:10 Goods, tragicomedy,
0:02:10 – 0:02:11 trigger TikTok logic.
0:02:11 – 0:02:13 Listen in now.
0:02:13 – 0:02:16 At Rektal Digital,
0:02:16 – 0:02:18 the file, Flattermann 4.
0:02:18 – 0:02:20 Look me in the eyes, clothes.
0:02:20 – 0:02:28 Hello and welcome to Rektal Digital. Hello Sarah.
0:02:28 – 0:02:29 Hello to Sasha.
0:02:29 – 0:02:31 Well, how are you?
0:02:31 – 0:02:41 Yeah, I'm fine. The last few days have been a bit exhausting, but so slow is
0:02:41 – 0:02:44 improvement in sight. The weekend is approaching.
0:02:44 – 0:02:55 Oh, yeah, the weekend. No appointments, rest, no visit, rest. Yes, we are looking forward to it.
0:02:55 – 0:03:02 Here's a little call to action. If you like what we do here,
0:03:02 – 0:03:08 then give us a like, subscribe to us and if you have something to say, then write us a
0:03:08 – 0:03:14 comment, no matter what platform, no matter
0:03:14 – 0:03:17 whether youtube or on the podcatcher or at
0:03:17 – 0:03:20 Spotify doesn't matter, the main thing is that you do it.
0:03:20 – 0:03:22 what. exactly.
0:03:22 – 0:03:26 And that's what I'd say we're coming
0:03:26 – 0:03:29 Let's go to the first section. yes
0:03:29 – 0:03:32 The last few weeks have been very
0:03:32 – 0:03:34 A lot of time has passed, I've had so much.
0:03:34 – 0:03:36 Write down what happened.
0:03:34 – 0:03:38 We were able to do that after today, we were able to throw it all out.
0:03:38 – 0:03:44 Exactly because we have today Thursday, 18.9.2025.
0:03:44 – 0:03:48 We're just past nine.
0:03:48 – 0:03:49 Okay.
0:03:49 – 0:03:58 And the last few hours have really shocked us and led us to
0:03:58 – 0:04:02 that we have made a rapid change of subject and no longer our
0:04:02 – 0:04:07 can use scripts that we have created over the last few weeks, with topics,
0:04:07 – 0:04:11 which we have collected. We had to rebuild it spontaneously.
0:04:11 – 0:04:20 So let's just say that since 5.15 p.m. we could totally forget that because there is
0:04:20 – 0:04:28 So much is happening in today's live of Frank and Maren, we were able to omit all this.
0:04:28 – 0:04:37 From 5.15 p.m. all the spectators were already ready for the live stream and at 5.45 p.m.,
0:04:37 – 0:04:44 pardon, at 17.46 clock, today only with a minute delay, Frank then has his livestream
0:04:44 – 0:04:50 started. In any case, applause at the point that it was only one minute today. You improve
0:04:50 – 0:04:53 You, there's a compliment out there, anyway.
0:04:53 – 0:05:00 Good, but still there are a few things from the past weeks,
0:05:00 – 0:05:04 which we would like to discuss again in the housemaking.
0:05:04 – 0:05:14 On the one hand, there was quite a explainer bear video from the good Lena to the not quite serious,
0:05:14 – 0:05:23 sarcastic and ironic illustrations you've made about them in terms of
0:05:23 – 0:05:29 the fact that she wanted to explain and show us something, but all this in the
0:05:29 – 0:05:36 The camera was mirrored. Exactly, and for the viewers who don't know what it's about now,
0:05:36 – 0:05:46 First of all, Lina blocked our accounts on all her social media channels,
0:05:46 – 0:05:56 But that doesn't mean we don't see your content. She also likes to distribute tips.
0:05:56 – 0:06:00 So I always wonder why do you actually distribute spikes when people,
0:06:00 – 0:06:05 For those of you who don't see it? That doesn't really make sense.
0:06:05 – 0:06:13 I don’t think Lina has heard of the – sorry – Barbara’s Trisand effect.
0:06:13 – 0:06:22 Because if she locks out all of them and wants to address them and then only for
0:06:22 – 0:06:28 her community, for her little bubble that explains everything, she carries this content yes
0:06:28 – 0:06:33 into their bladder and they arrive in their bladder.
0:06:33 – 0:06:39 So what she really wants to prevent, provokes her with it.
0:06:39 – 0:06:47 Exactly, and there is an important point to add. I've always wondered,
0:06:47 – 0:06:53 What was Lina's content before she co-created content with Frank?
0:06:53 – 0:07:01 Because there is hardly anything to see about it at the moment. You hardly have a
0:07:01 – 0:07:09 Ordinary storytelling. It's all about, let's say, the Frank bubble and...
0:07:09 – 0:07:14 Distribute spikes. But nothing can be seen of their actual content. And they
0:07:14 – 0:07:21 She says she has such a loyal following. And I wonder what's really going on with yours.
0:07:21 – 0:07:28 Eight such great followers who follow her before the Frank became part of her content? Stay
0:07:28 – 0:07:34 Aren't people really on the track when it's all about the Frank bubble?
0:07:34 – 0:07:40 You can also see it in the numbers on Instagram, not Instagram, on TikTok. The
0:07:40 – 0:07:45 They have collapsed massively. Yes, yes.
0:07:45 – 0:07:53 Because people actually want to see their daily memes, but then they get
0:07:53 – 0:08:00 Look for content where it isn't interested. Then she enters
0:08:00 – 0:08:10 Reconnaissance video about a TikToker she found interesting with, but didn't say the name,
0:08:10 – 0:08:19 But he has warned against it because he has very special preferences. And yes, it was also asked,
0:08:19 – 0:08:26 Tell me, if you don't tell us who it is, how do we know who to beware of?
0:08:26 – 0:08:29 Do you want someone to understand the logic?
0:08:29 – 0:08:35 In any case, we have a suggestion for improvement at this point and that is really serious.
0:08:35 – 0:08:42 If you do not want the name Doxxing, especially since you usually have no problem with Doxxing at all,
0:08:42 – 0:08:50 If you have, then maybe you shouldn't make an educational video about person XY,
0:08:50 – 0:08:56 You should make a general video. According to the motto "Hey guys, there's something for me
0:08:56 – 0:09:02 This is happening and I want to warn you in general that this and that is happening to you on the Internet.
0:09:02 – 0:09:09 or that people come to you with those and preferences because, I don't know, you're in danger
0:09:09 – 0:09:15 Because it's funny, it doesn't matter. But maybe you should raise it like this,
0:09:15 – 0:09:21 Instead of using an explicit person to take care of the person,
0:09:21 – 0:09:28 But you don't call the person. I don't want to say anything wrong, but you have,
0:09:28 – 0:09:35 I don't know how many people are into very, very strange things.
0:09:35 – 0:09:44 She could write to me, I would like to report this. So like I said, I worked on a phone sex hotline.
0:09:44 – 0:09:52 I have the best view of it, so I can tell you all about it. There's nothing that doesn't exist.
0:09:52 – 0:10:04 And these funny fetishes affect males as well as females. Oh God, yes, even women can have very creepy preferences, but I can tell you that.
0:10:04 – 0:10:08 But let's leave it that way.
0:10:08 – 0:10:12 Maybe you'll work on it in the future if you don't want to dox a person,
0:10:12 – 0:10:19 that you may have a video of a general nature and really wind it up as a reconnaissance video.
0:10:19 – 0:10:23 Is a content improvement times, apart from the Flattermann theme.
0:10:23 – 0:10:27 Maybe you'll take some constructive criticism.
0:10:27 – 0:10:32 Definitely in an explanatory video, where the overlay mirror was wrong.
0:10:32 – 0:10:38 So the picture she had painted was mirrored and she had to make an overlay on it,
0:10:38 – 0:10:43 In order to be able to read what she had meant, she had different categories.
0:10:43 – 0:10:45 Explained by haters.
0:10:46 – 0:10:50 What is the brain?
0:10:50 – 0:10:57 Or what about paying?
0:10:57 – 0:10:59 Quiet
0:10:59 – 0:11:05 Pretty sharp his brain
0:11:05 – 0:11:07 What is such a tooth?
0:11:14 – 0:11:19 In short, a Lassiz action
0:11:19 – 0:11:24 And the rope in the...
0:11:24 – 0:11:32 ...circle
0:11:32 – 0:11:56 [Music]
0:11:57 – 0:12:06 So those who have a problem with Frank, then those who are Wollny fans and the followers.
0:12:06 – 0:12:19 And she has unmistakably encircled us as a follower, located us, because we do this only a few clicks.
0:12:19 – 0:12:26 Yes, and unfortunately we have to say at this point, that is not so, because then
0:12:26 – 0:12:32 If you have to pull from the front, how did we get to the channel of Flatterman in the first place?
0:12:32 – 0:12:39 It was so that I had originally followed Karlanta, at TikTok and also on Instagram
0:12:39 – 0:12:44 It's been a long time since she made content with Frank.
0:12:44 – 0:12:56 And via Kalanta one became aware of Frank's YouTube channel. And thus this
0:12:56 – 0:13:04 Repetol is almost open. They started watching videos where Kalanta was affected.
0:13:04 – 0:13:10 with Frank, but then also saw more and more content from Frank,
0:13:10 – 0:13:16 Which you really didn't want to see. There are also some very strange cryptic
0:13:16 – 0:13:22 News on Instagram seen in his stories, which you could not assign,
0:13:22 – 0:13:28 because you were not in this bubble at all and have nothing to do with this bubble
0:13:28 – 0:13:33 wanted. Those were the origins of it. In the beginning, I was always wondering,
0:13:33 – 0:13:44 "What's wrong with that?" And that was one of the reasons why you avoided this channel and I almost never watched these Instagram stories.
0:13:44 – 0:13:55 But the decisive point was then this live stream, where he was live with Lina, the self-proclaimed expert.
0:13:55 – 0:14:02 And that was the point where we started our first podcast episode.
0:14:02 – 0:14:04 Yeah, and we took it pretty late.
0:14:04 – 0:14:11 And we also noticed a little bit that we were actually already through with the day.
0:14:11 – 0:14:17 And we were almost no followers there now.
0:14:17 – 0:14:26 We haven't had any contact with people who have a problem with you.
0:14:27 – 0:14:33 But we had made this out of ourselves, this podcast,
0:14:33 – 0:14:38 because this content has simply gone massively on the sack and the way,
0:14:38 – 0:14:40 How all this is raised.
0:14:40 – 0:14:41 That's right.
0:14:41 – 0:14:47 And so we got in and after the podcast came a lot of resonance, where we
0:14:47 – 0:14:53 We were also surprised because we didn't expect it that way at first.
0:14:53 – 0:14:55 And they were written.
0:14:55 – 0:15:03 by a lot of people. And that's how you slowly got into this game. And slowly,
0:15:03 – 0:15:11 I have to say, one almost regrets that one has entered this Rabbit Hole at all,
0:15:11 – 0:15:19 Because this is a barrel without soil. And from week to week, day to day, you keep rising
0:15:19 – 0:15:26 Going further and further into the deepest abysses, which is what it actually is for.
0:15:26 – 0:15:33 There were stories between the different protagonists and actions that ran there.
0:15:33 – 0:15:37 Then you have solidarity with them again, then there is again
0:15:37 – 0:15:43 If a break happens, then you have solidarity with someone else, then there was a break.
0:15:43 – 0:15:50 That's unbelievable, it's like a little script for a bad soap opera,
0:15:50 – 0:15:53 But you just stick to it because it's so exciting.
0:15:53 – 0:16:01 But this is such a soap opera where you'd never admit that you're pulling this in,
0:16:01 – 0:16:07 Yes, because this is already unpleasant somewhere, yes, and you are then also asked by the environment,
0:16:07 – 0:16:09 Why are you pulling this shit in at all?
0:16:09 – 0:16:15 And then there's just the point, you've started with the podcast format,
0:16:15 – 0:16:25 You want to continue with it, but at certain points you sometimes sit there and are
0:16:25 – 0:16:33 I'm just stunned by the stories they tell you. And you wonder
0:16:33 – 0:16:38 how a person has been able to establish themselves on social media for so long and why
0:16:38 – 0:16:48 a certain hate culture has not taken hold of it much, much earlier and the whole thing
0:16:48 – 0:17:02 Much, much more is hung in quotation marks. Yes, then in the recordings and reaction videos
0:17:02 – 0:17:09 With Kalenta and the Wollnys we were mentioned again at the very beginning.
0:17:09 – 0:17:13 So I'm gonna do what it came down to for me.
0:17:13 – 0:17:16 Oh, junk radio.
0:17:16 – 0:17:18 Oh, and that's what I put in my head.
0:17:18 – 0:17:18 So, ah.
0:17:18 – 0:17:26 Yes, so I found that again so epic, this moment, this staging.
0:17:26 – 0:17:33 So we really have to be like such a nail, such a purulent pre-uncle.
0:17:33 – 0:17:35 On his ass.
0:17:35 – 0:17:35 Yes, yes.
0:17:35 – 0:17:42 Yes, the point is, every time I see this, I always have to start laughing terribly,
0:17:42 – 0:17:48 Because if I really want to avoid being in conversation,
0:17:48 – 0:17:51 I should avoid sharpening.
0:17:51 – 0:17:53 Yes, yes.
0:17:53 – 0:18:17 Yes, and he always tries to suggest that I don't mind and he is above everything and these are always the points where he just shows how much it triggers him and there you are honest, that amuses you already in the place and you smile at that and think, well Frank, go on.
0:18:17 – 0:18:26 Yeah, then one thing caught our attention. Frank now makes the master, so to speak, and
0:18:26 – 0:18:33 Lina tries to avoid this as much as possible in her videos. I also found that very remarkable.
0:18:33 – 0:18:40 Yeah, me too. First of all, you do not make up everything and everything that others say yes,
0:18:40 – 0:18:49 It is, so to speak, Hate. You can tell that you care a lot more than you can admit.
0:18:49 – 0:18:51 Yes, so to say, to give.
0:18:51 – 0:19:00 Yes, of course. Because, of course, she has made countless stories about us and also us.
0:19:00 – 0:19:07 mentioned in TikTok videos and yes also in the background in the WhatsApp groups yes
0:19:07 – 0:19:16 They talked about us very thematically. And I think it's really funny at this point,
0:19:16 – 0:19:20 'Cause you realize she's into it. She actually has something on her
0:19:20 – 0:19:27 Changed language patterns. I mean, that's positive, so to speak, but you also like to go back
0:19:27 – 0:19:32 You can also re-integrate it into every second sentence. This is just such a
0:19:32 – 0:19:38 own Lina brand. But that's just something, that has recognition value.
0:19:38 – 0:19:42 Yes, maybe you should just register it as a brand.
0:19:42 – 0:19:46 Yes, another tip, if you once again make independent content at TikTok,
0:19:46 – 0:19:52 when at some point three brain cells have slipped properly and you once again have your own
0:19:52 – 0:19:58 Doing something and taking care of your true followers, you could, so to speak,
0:19:58 – 0:20:02 Re-integrate when you make a small format about yourself.
0:20:02 – 0:20:09 You know, such a little reminder, such a thing where you say that's Lina and that doesn't have to be
0:20:09 – 0:20:10 Absolutely unsympathetic.
0:20:10 – 0:20:15 But yeah, I mean, we don't have to give her any tips here.
0:20:15 – 0:20:21 So I mean, it is always interpreted negatively anyway, because Lina paints
0:20:21 – 0:20:24 The world as she likes it.
0:20:24 – 0:20:28 Oh, you said that nicely. Yeah, right?
0:20:28 – 0:20:36 So, let's move on to the next section. Last week's livestreams,
0:20:36 – 0:20:41 This has been cut short by the current events.
0:20:41 – 0:20:46 Exactly, that's why we won't go into it for too long.
0:20:46 – 0:20:57 So there's just in the last video live streams Frank and his wife had talked about it
0:20:57 – 0:21:01 They had no experience of racism.
0:21:01 – 0:21:04 They have never been exposed to racism.
0:21:04 – 0:21:13 I found this such a critical statement, because there is no racism by definition against it.
0:21:13 – 0:21:22 Racism is white because racism is white. Exactly. It was invented by white people.
0:21:22 – 0:21:34 against other cultures. Yes, yes. And there may be xenophobia against whites. Yes, yes. But racism
0:21:34 – 0:21:41 There is no such thing, and I would ask you to make that clear again.
0:21:41 – 0:21:47 a next livestream and please go back to the topic, dear Frank and wife,
0:21:47 – 0:21:59 because we don't like the fact that you leave it that way, especially in the context of the one
0:21:59 – 0:22:10 The guest you had. [Siebert] Yes, I'm thinking of a person who's going to Turkey right now.
0:22:10 – 0:22:23 emigrated. Yes, yes. Okay, all right. It was awkward to see this and I think we have
0:22:23 – 0:22:28 since now enough promised, because you can read it on the Internet, so you don't just have to ask chat GBT,
0:22:28 – 0:22:34 Dear Frank, but you can also just throw Google, there are Wikipedia articles
0:22:34 – 0:22:41 There are plenty of scientific papers that can be read about what racism is.
0:22:41 – 0:22:48 Those who practice racism and I think that should now be enough to the point.
0:22:48 – 0:22:56 Yes, and if not, it could of course also ask people who unfortunately have God's racism.
0:22:56 – 0:23:01 were exposed. That would be a nice topic for Frank in his livestream,
0:23:01 – 0:23:08 Let's talk about this topic, because obviously you can talk about racism.
0:23:08 – 0:23:14 Yes, there is still a lot to learn. Especially when it comes to everyday racism. They were also these
0:23:14 – 0:23:19 Things you mentioned there. In everyday situations, they don't have racism.
0:23:19 – 0:23:26 experience. I was really embarrassed to see that. Yes, and also very hard this statement.
0:23:26 – 0:23:39 Yes, then there was also the big topic around Frank's eyes in a livestream and there was a
0:23:39 – 0:23:45 Livestream on TikTok, where I was a guest, where I almost made a request myself.
0:23:45 – 0:23:50 So I have not been asked if I want to participate, but I am myself as a guest
0:23:50 – 0:23:57 He went there, asked a question, was accepted, and then Frank talked about it.
0:23:57 – 0:24:05 a small tiny part so excited and even then presented it later in this way
0:24:05 – 0:24:11 It was as if it was a live stream from me, from junk radio. And now I would
0:24:11 – 0:24:19 I'd like to discuss it again, because it's so wrong and that really shows a big difference.
0:24:19 – 0:24:29 Problem that Frank Flattermann shows again and again in his stories on Instagram. Because this
0:24:29 – 0:24:34 Snippets that were made were then torn out of the context that the
0:24:34 – 0:24:42 It sounds vicious. Because, I quote now, the statement had been by Julia,
0:24:42 – 0:24:49 I think the doctor injected too deeply at the eye injections.
0:24:49 – 0:24:58 And that's what she said, yes, but that's what was said before, that Frank was with Chet-GBT.
0:24:58 – 0:25:05 had a little conversation and then there came the statement that Chet-GBT has the guess,
0:25:05 – 0:25:11 that Julia likes to be adopted by the Wollny family, or by Silvia
0:25:11 – 0:25:25 would like to. He left that out. Just like the story where Oliver Pocher introduced the petition
0:25:25 – 0:25:31 And then he made fun of what he had done.
0:25:31 – 0:25:36 The small family war that's going on there. And how unnecessarily this is done in public.
0:25:36 – 0:25:43 Yeah, if I could just hook up, I wasn't on the livestream,
0:25:43 – 0:25:50 I could have been heard for about 30 seconds, because when you were in the bedroom,
0:25:50 – 0:25:56 in the livestream, I was just playing in the living room and came over briefly,
0:25:56 – 0:26:02 because I brought you something, a snack and I was quite surprised,
0:26:02 – 0:26:10 'Cause you were talking and I was wondering, are you on the phone? Such an atypical time.
0:26:10 – 0:26:15 And then you said, no, no, I'm live on TikTok. And of course I was even more shocked,
0:26:15 – 0:26:23 Because we haven't been to TikTok for a long time. And then I had
0:26:23 – 0:26:28 Say hello for a moment. But I also left again and I got from this livestream
0:26:28 – 0:26:39 Absolutely nothing to notice. But what I want to say is that Frank, Lina or Marin,
0:26:39 – 0:26:44 They like to take small quotes and tear them out of context.
0:26:44 – 0:26:51 Yes, even what Lina had shared. It was just a snippet of a very long
0:26:51 – 0:26:59 Conversation. Exactly where the context is missing to the statement. Quite simply, so that you have a snippet again,
0:26:59 – 0:27:07 where you can almost tear other people apart on the net without showing the full context. and Frank,
0:27:07 – 0:27:15 At this point I would like to say, first of all, yes, you should ask beforehand whether you want to use the material.
0:27:15 – 0:27:21 You can use it, but let's shit about privacy, that's okay. But
0:27:21 – 0:27:28 What you can't shit about is what is good journalism and what is bad journalism.
0:27:28 – 0:27:33 And how do you report a thing? One does not report one thing unilaterally.
0:27:33 – 0:27:38 And you don't even go there and take a statement and tear it completely out of the
0:27:38 – 0:27:44 context out. That's what, that's not fair to the other parties. Yes, it became
0:27:44 – 0:27:51 To say something that was a critical and stupid statement, I agree. Perhaps if they had
0:27:51 – 0:27:59 can save at the point, yes, but you have torn it out of context and put it now
0:27:59 – 0:28:07 extra in such a light that such a thing for no reason is simply distributed as an evil tip against you
0:28:07 – 0:28:14 It was that you rather provoked Frank before, you don't say that
0:28:14 – 0:28:19 this place. Of course, this does not suggest that other people make such a statement,
0:28:19 – 0:28:26 That's not to say. But if someone like you is provoking so hardcore other people,
0:28:26 – 0:28:34 One should not be surprised at the headwind. And this victim narrative is just something,
0:28:34 – 0:28:40 Which is insanely against the grain in your entire bubble.
0:28:40 – 0:28:46 Yes, that's just as much an example as Lina had shown the shreds,
0:28:46 – 0:28:49 At least he had freed the voices.
0:28:49 – 0:28:49 Wow!
0:28:49 – 0:29:00 Yes, when it came to hearing from 50 people every day,
0:29:00 – 0:29:08 What a great person she is. I told you about 50 people. She then claimed in
0:29:08 – 0:29:15 Another story, I would have said of 50 men. She had written,
0:29:15 – 0:29:22 She hears from 50 people, both privately and professionally, what a great person she is during the day. me
0:29:22 – 0:29:28 I don't know where the big difference is between 50 people and 50 people. So this must
0:29:28 – 0:29:33 Let me tell you a few things about the difference in definition. But I have in
0:29:33 – 0:29:38 I didn't say anything wrong. I didn't just say she got 50 men.
0:29:38 – 0:29:44 No, she used all this to make it clear again, I'm the victim here.
0:29:44 – 0:29:49 They hate me, for whatever reason. And they put me in a bad light.
0:29:49 – 0:29:56 Yeah, and that's the point. So, dear people, I have my question and this is a serious one
0:29:56 – 0:30:04 This is a question for the Flutties. So for me, people mean male, female, divers,
0:30:04 – 0:30:15 It is a human individual. For me, this belongs to the category of people and people. How
0:30:15 – 0:30:24 please, dear Lina, how deep the hydrogen peroxide has penetrated your scalp that you
0:30:24 – 0:30:35 The idea is to claim that Sascha would have said 50 men. You can see, as I said,
0:30:35 – 0:30:42 simply that you try by all means to draw people to your side, to put you in the
0:30:42 – 0:30:50 Pushing for victimhood in order to portray the other side almost badly again. But these are the
0:30:50 – 0:30:57 Means you work with, Lina. And another example of why we don't like you can
0:30:57 – 0:31:04 I'll tell you, in our first podcast episode, we criticized you. Rightly, of course
0:31:04 – 0:31:12 Even with tips, we admit that at the place. What you did in response,
0:31:12 – 0:31:23 has blown up any frame, because you went and checked Sascha's website
0:31:23 – 0:31:30 and found out that Sascha is seriously ill, had a stroke, is in need of care,
0:31:30 – 0:31:39 where the nursing service really goes in and out and Sascha is really seriously impaired in
0:31:39 – 0:31:46 his day-to-day life and you had nothing better to do with it than his degree of care in question
0:31:46 – 0:31:53 to make and publicly call in your story, that the people
0:31:53 – 0:32:00 MDK should be informed and you should also check whether this is so at all.
0:32:00 – 0:32:04 Dear Lina, I wish you at this point that you will never get into this situation,
0:32:04 – 0:32:11 where Sascha is located or is able to care for persons in need of care,
0:32:11 – 0:32:18 Especially if they are loved ones. It's one thing,
0:32:18 – 0:32:28 Criticizing someone for what they do. It's another thing to try quasi-maliciously,
0:32:28 – 0:32:37 Destroying someone else's life. And that's something you did. And this is the
0:32:37 – 0:32:42 Point why you forfeited all sympathy points with us. And I'd be interested too,
0:32:42 – 0:32:50 The flatties think so. If someone tells you, you, I don't like your t-shirt,
0:32:50 – 0:32:56 because, I don't know, I don't like the print on it, the color doesn't suit you,
0:32:56 – 0:33:05 for example, the right to say to someone as an example, yes, that may be yes,
0:33:05 – 0:33:10 But you're in a wheelchair now, are you disabled at all? I don't think so.
0:33:10 – 0:33:13 Yeah, you look way too healthy.
0:33:13 – 0:33:19 Yeah, so just because someone doesn't like your t-shirt, for example, you go and put
0:33:19 – 0:33:25 For example, the disability of someone else. But these are mistakes,
0:33:25 – 0:33:31 Which escapes real logic. And that was just for Lina,
0:33:31 – 0:33:38 Properly distributing maliciously. And this falls under the category of the most disgusting things,
0:33:38 – 0:33:44 You can do it to other people online. Next to doxing, next to death threats. Because you
0:33:44 – 0:33:52 Trying to destroy the existence of other people. And dear Lina, in this place you may
0:33:52 – 0:34:01 Don't forget to take legal action if this game happens.
0:34:01 – 0:34:08 Going in a certain direction. All this has been secured, there's evidence and I'd take your
0:34:08 – 0:34:13 Make smaller buns because you have to learn, there's a difference
0:34:13 – 0:34:20 Between criticism, hate and someone want to systematically destroy life.
0:34:20 – 0:34:30 You also have to say to question the knack of doing it just because you're doing podcasts,
0:34:30 – 0:34:36 It is also possible to work more than three hours a day.
0:34:36 – 0:34:44 Just as we don't know about your life, you don't know about our lives.
0:34:44 – 0:34:49 Because we don't post stories where we hop around in the garden.
0:34:49 – 0:34:53 We don't post pictures where you can see anything.
0:34:53 – 0:34:57 That doesn't exist with us.
0:34:57 – 0:35:02 The only thing we're doing is this podcast and I'm writing blog articles.
0:35:02 – 0:35:07 How and where I do this, you don't know.
0:35:07 – 0:35:10 Think about it.
0:35:10 – 0:35:11 Exactly.
0:35:11 – 0:35:19 And just because you share your life publicly doesn't mean others have to.
0:35:19 – 0:35:26 And that's exactly why this tip was screwed together with the ballpoint pens in the last podcast.
0:35:26 – 0:35:27 That's fine.
0:35:27 – 0:35:32 Well, let's get to the elephant that's really in the room.
0:35:32 – 0:35:38 Today's live from Maren and Flattermann.
0:35:38 – 0:35:41 What a fever dream.
0:35:41 – 0:35:45 It's more than just a fever dream.
0:35:45 – 0:35:55 We come to the deepest abysses that a human being can actually have in such qualities and also in deeds.
0:35:55 – 0:36:04 where you really morally ask yourself, what went wrong and how can three other
0:36:04 – 0:36:11 People in a livestream also tolerate and support the whole thing.
0:36:11 – 0:36:22 In total there were four. It was Maren, Frank, Hotte and Michael. And it should be today
0:36:22 – 0:36:28 actually go around the video of this AI song by Hotte and then about the,
0:36:28 – 0:36:34 What was that? Oh, some trash format. The trash format became,
0:36:34 – 0:36:39 Even a small spoiler, not at all thematized, because Mare said that the other is
0:36:39 – 0:36:49 So exciting now, let's just leave it out. So for a moment, Hotte had an AI-generated
0:36:49 – 0:36:56 Song had done what he had uploaded to his channel, where it was about the presumed
0:36:56 – 0:37:09 Death of one, yes I did not know him, Fir went and that of course beat quite an apartment
0:37:09 – 0:37:16 It also disappeared relatively quickly. You have to say at this point,
0:37:16 – 0:37:23 When we heard this live stream today, we had no idea how Lautfunk was doing it.
0:37:23 – 0:37:30 He told me who that was. We learned this in retrospect and were still wondering,
0:37:30 – 0:37:37 What a strange story this is told in the livestream. And
0:37:37 – 0:37:46 First of all, this was, as it was interpreted in the live stream, yes, for the site of today.
0:37:46 – 0:37:57 Yes, so a Yvonne posted a story where she said that someone in the
0:37:57 – 0:38:05 Dying lies and that it is very painful for her, because that is a good friend. And then
0:38:05 – 0:38:14 There was then this AI song, where Hotte just rip fir somehow appeared in it. That had yes
0:38:14 – 0:38:23 And had made such waves that Trash Time, Taimi, had made a very outraged story about it,
0:38:23 – 0:38:29 How can you make a song like that without knowing it's dead?
0:38:29 – 0:38:35 If I understood that correctly, wasn't the lyrics livestreamed in Turkish?
0:38:35 – 0:38:39 I don't know. To me, it sounded like the song was in Turkish.
0:38:39 – 0:38:43 I'm not sure, so here's a question mark.
0:38:43 – 0:38:49 But Hotte also has this video or the statement or the song very much
0:38:49 – 0:38:54 quickly after receiving the criticism, and from many sides,
0:38:54 – 0:38:55 Also in private.
0:38:55 – 0:39:01 That's right, he said, that's also a memory protocol, he had hundreds of
0:39:01 – 0:39:07 received from comments, then put the thing on private and then still has
0:39:07 – 0:39:15 He made a 30-minute explainer video where he apologized for doing it.
0:39:15 – 0:39:21 And this thing has now been addressed in this live.
0:39:21 – 0:39:26 Yes, and now comes the hammer and then comes almost this now,
0:39:26 – 0:39:32 as it is presented in the live stream versus reality, which is also provable by the way
0:39:32 – 0:39:37 Based on stories and photos that were posted in the stories.
0:39:37 – 0:39:41 Hotte did the same with Frank.
0:39:41 – 0:39:43 And then everyone agreed,
0:39:43 – 0:39:47 that this Yvonne Post did,
0:39:47 – 0:39:51 Your partner is already dead.
0:39:51 – 0:39:52 Or a good friend.
0:39:52 – 0:39:55 Or a good friend, sorry, a good friend would be dead.
0:39:55 – 0:39:59 And that's why she's taking it back a little bit
0:39:59 – 0:40:02 She needs time because she's not doing well.
0:40:02 – 0:40:08 There was something very, very different in this post.
0:40:08 – 0:40:11 And you can read that aloud, if you like,
0:40:11 – 0:40:14 Because we took a screenshot of it.
0:40:14 – 0:40:16 Okay, I'm reading.
0:40:16 – 0:40:19 These days my world is still.
0:40:19 – 0:40:24 A close friend of mine, whom many of you know, is dying.
0:40:25 – 0:40:30 This diagnosis pulled the floor under my feet five months ago.
0:40:30 – 0:40:33 Words can hardly describe how much.
0:40:33 – 0:40:36 Now I can't read it because there's a big fatter on it.
0:40:36 – 0:40:38 All right.
0:40:38 – 0:40:44 So folks, you've noticed, and we didn't know that before.
0:40:44 – 0:40:47 We didn't know that until after the live stream.
0:40:47 – 0:40:56 And we also have no idea about a past that exists between Yvonne, Hotte and Flattermann.
0:40:56 – 0:40:59 We have no idea about this Rabbit Hole at this point.
0:40:59 – 0:41:04 But we can talk about the current situation.
0:41:04 – 0:41:07 And that is the state of affairs.
0:41:07 – 0:41:13 Hotte then claimed in the livestream, together with Flattermann,
0:41:13 – 0:41:22 that they had read this in such a way that this said buddy "good friend" would already be dead,
0:41:22 – 0:41:27 This is not to be read in any syllable, because you have heard it yourself now and you can
0:41:27 – 0:41:33 You can also do your own research by going to the side of this Yvonne.
0:41:33 – 0:41:37 Yes, the problem is, stories are 24 hours away.
0:41:37 – 0:41:44 Exactly. The point of the matter, but maybe she saves it in the highlights, that will
0:41:44 – 0:41:49 They certainly do, because that's an important thing, let's hope at this point.
0:41:49 – 0:41:54 If not, you can write to us. We have this one screenshot,
0:41:54 – 0:42:03 You can see it if you want to see it. Otherwise, there is nothing more to
0:42:03 – 0:42:11 But it's very interesting that you try to minimise the fact that you now have a
0:42:11 – 0:42:18 The song was published. And since Yvonne has been told that there is a past,
0:42:18 – 0:42:23 which is anything but positive and this Yvonne probably said months ago,
0:42:23 – 0:42:30 that she now wants her peace and wants to close this chapter, Potte has quasi
0:42:30 – 0:42:38 He did this song, and I don't think he did it as the next love.
0:42:38 – 0:42:46 But as a provocation. Why should you make a post that concerns the enemy,
0:42:46 – 0:42:54 What if someone died there? In this case, it has nothing to do with a decency gesture.
0:42:54 – 0:42:59 how he wants to present this in the livestream, but with the fact that you also have a
0:42:59 – 0:43:07 I wanted to spread lace, at the point where it hurts. In a very disgusting way.
0:43:07 – 0:43:13 And the bad thing is, this livestream was about him justifying himself and the
0:43:13 – 0:43:20 It was Yvonne's fault. And that Trashtime almost hooked up there,
0:43:20 – 0:43:26 It had nothing to do with Yvonne. No, not at all. Above all,
0:43:26 – 0:43:35 this reversal of guilt and we have it again and again with all the people who are in this bubble,
0:43:35 – 0:43:43 Again and again we have this typical reversal of guilt. Yeah, they're building shit, then, yeah, but that's how it was
0:43:43 – 0:43:50 That's because he and she said so and so. Like splashing them in the eye, like splashing them in the eye
0:43:50 – 0:43:57 50 people. It is always interpreted in such a way that others are to blame and we are actually the victim.
0:43:57 – 0:43:58 Exactly.
0:43:58 – 0:44:06 All four agreed. And that was really so many moments in this livestream,
0:44:06 – 0:44:11 where I just felt bad as a viewer because they were talking about a dying person
0:44:11 – 0:44:18 I'm talking and have totally re-bagitalized what a big shit happened,
0:44:18 – 0:44:25 Someone went there who said goodbye in a pretty stupid way.
0:44:25 – 0:44:32 And that gesture could have gotten stuck today. Like I said, I don't think it has the
0:44:32 – 0:44:37 The next love was. If it had been for the next love, he would have
0:44:37 – 0:44:44 privately written and would have written, no idea, my condolences, I wish you the best
0:44:44 – 0:44:51 for this difficult time and a lot of strength, no idea anything in the direction, instead of
0:44:51 – 0:44:58 because he knew exactly and that was the intention behind it, 100 percent of my opinion
0:44:58 – 0:45:07 He wanted to do it again, in a place where there was a
0:45:07 – 0:45:13 Woman really suffers and is broken and is on the ground, so quasi when someone is on the ground,
0:45:13 – 0:45:19 Again, in a special, in my opinion, antisocial way.
0:45:19 – 0:45:22 Especially in an extremely vulnerable situation.
0:45:22 – 0:45:25 Exactly.
0:45:25 – 0:45:36 After this full hustle, full culprit-victim reversal spiked podcast and
0:45:36 – 0:45:43 Of course, there was a story about the livestream from Trashtime in which they made the accusations.
0:45:43 – 0:45:55 He denied it and tried to clarify the matter. And then we're on the Yvonne
0:45:55 – 0:46:01 I remembered it because at the end of the day, she was linking to me again.
0:46:01 – 0:46:06 At least Trash Time gives credits, opposite to others.
0:46:06 – 0:46:08 That's right. Flattermann always talks about it.
0:46:08 – 0:46:12 I've got you in the links downstairs, there's show notes in there.
0:46:12 – 0:46:14 And then you look, and there's never a link.
0:46:14 – 0:46:19 No, he never mentions people in the shownotes. Not in principle.
0:46:19 – 0:46:23 He's the big flatterer, he doesn't need it.
0:46:23 – 0:46:24 Neither does the source.
0:46:24 – 0:46:29 In any case, Trash Time had made more than clear in her story,
0:46:29 – 0:46:39 How horrified she was at this constellation of four, how much they have portrayed themselves as victims again and how evil everyone else is again.
0:46:39 – 0:46:43 And then we went to the profile of the Yvonne.
0:46:43 – 0:46:53 And there was also a lot of news about the dynamics within these acquaintances.
0:46:53 – 0:47:01 So first of all, it was a woman who sat there and then stopped making these stories,
0:47:01 – 0:47:06 It was completely dissolved and several times the tears were really close.
0:47:06 – 0:47:10 It also seemed authentic to me.
0:47:10 – 0:47:14 Michael had said before that in the stories it was always me, me, me,
0:47:14 – 0:47:15 She and I are a narcissist.
0:47:15 – 0:47:16 Exposed.
0:47:16 – 0:47:26 expressed. By and large, this seemed very authentic to me, which the woman had given of herself.
0:47:26 – 0:47:35 And yes, how can I say, she had just been shocked by the fact that you stop again maliciously,
0:47:35 – 0:47:42 that she had been maliciously blamed, that she was to blame for the fact that others would agree,
0:47:42 – 0:47:51 that this Tamme would now be dead, whereby he is dying and is already no longer approachable.
0:47:51 – 0:47:57 And he had asked her when he was no longer able to communicate,
0:47:57 – 0:48:00 She should be his mouthpiece.
0:48:00 – 0:48:07 Yes, point is, this woman, whom I didn't know so far, also felt incredibly sorry for me,
0:48:07 – 0:48:17 Because if you were in a grief process yourself or with a human being to
0:48:17 – 0:48:24 who is dying, even if they are relatives or friends, you know,
0:48:24 – 0:48:29 How much you suffer from it. And even if you haven't experienced it yet, you should be doing so much.
0:48:29 – 0:48:38 Have empathy that you know this is an absolutely emotional roller coaster of feelings
0:48:38 – 0:48:51 You're really capable of shit. Like I said, the woman was authentic. I can go to
0:48:51 – 0:48:58 Don't tell the woman anything else because we don't know her, but this situation has happened again.
0:48:58 – 0:49:06 shown that things are simply completely misrepresented and that unnecessarily
0:49:06 – 0:49:16 Tips are distributed in a framework that can hardly be surpassed in inhumanity.
0:49:16 – 0:49:16 Yes, yes.
0:49:16 – 0:49:23 I hope these people don't do it themselves someday.
0:49:23 – 0:49:32 What was of course still interesting in the livestream of Maren and Frank had been,
0:49:32 – 0:49:42 In the end, they were told to hold back. Not to all the inhibition,
0:49:42 – 0:49:51 to jump on all the hate, as they always say so nicely, from now on and he should
0:49:51 – 0:49:56 Go there, be a little cooler, maybe a little social media detox for a while
0:49:56 – 0:50:02 and would then perhaps react a little more calmly to the whole thing,
0:50:02 – 0:50:11 When you criticize him. I found this really interesting because Frank is referring to
0:50:11 – 0:50:20 A bunch of his story content from Häme to critics. Right and no matter if he
0:50:20 – 0:50:29 this inhibitor has now written itself or quasi used the stories of the flood teas, which yes
0:50:29 – 0:50:37 They are, of course, instrumentalized. There remain tips that he distributes because he has to do the whole thing
0:50:37 – 0:50:44 Do not share. No, he naturally wants to strengthen his position and wants to say, hey guys,
0:50:44 – 0:50:49 Not only do I agree, but XY agrees. But at the end of the day, it's for
0:50:49 – 0:50:55 Again, it's just a matter of distributing that tip. And, of course, he wants to
0:50:55 – 0:51:03 Generate attention. Action means reaction. He who sows wind will reap storm. And
0:51:03 – 0:51:11 He is also aware of this. The bad press is also the press. Slowly he realizes,
0:51:11 – 0:51:18 It's going to be too much because more and more people are going against it. And they rightly do.
0:51:18 – 0:51:26 because it slowly reaches a point where many people no longer look away and sometimes
0:51:26 – 0:51:35 Tell them the limits and say, "Frank, it's enough now slowly." And many people have
0:51:35 – 0:51:40 We have also been contacted by those who, for example, have turned away from Frank in the last few weeks.
0:51:40 – 0:51:48 Yes, or even people who are in this game for the long term and then just enlighten us
0:51:48 – 0:51:58 I wanted to know when the game started, what the triggers were, how Frank always reacted to it.
0:51:58 – 0:52:05 and so on. It wasn't just one person, it was several people. Yeah, and what's going on
0:52:05 – 0:52:12 What is striking is that more and more voices are also being voiced against Frank, especially from
0:52:12 – 0:52:19 People who used to be supporters or fans of Frank. And that's also something he noticed.
0:52:19 – 0:52:27 Only, he always puts himself in the victim role and distributes further tips. Would
0:52:27 – 0:52:34 If he didn't win, he'd have more fans. The whole thing has its origin somewhere.
0:52:34 – 0:52:42 found. In retro content. That's right. And there are dynamics. When I spikes and hems
0:52:42 – 0:52:51 Give it away, and I'll get love back. Yes, yes. And that's something you learn from an early age. So,
0:52:51 – 0:52:57 I just don't understand how to build this victim narrative around you. And
0:52:57 – 0:53:05 And we are also not guilt-free, because we have also gotten into it and also
0:53:05 – 0:53:13 We are now responding to reactions, to actions that were there and that is now quasi ours.
0:53:13 – 0:53:19 Reaction was also assigned in other episodes and we also distributed peaks and we
0:53:19 – 0:53:22 They're just as bad as a Frank is.
0:53:22 – 0:53:32 But this dynamic of the balls thrown at you wouldn't work if the other side didn't continue to play.
0:53:32 – 0:53:43 And even if Frank goes now and makes a lot of videos or live streams, where it's about great reconciliations with people,
0:53:43 – 0:53:50 Nevertheless, such dynamics continue to exist, even if he tries to polish the image.
0:53:50 – 0:53:57 polishing. However, this does not work as long as you continue to distribute tips and also tips in
0:53:57 – 0:54:04 Take the reconciliation video, for example. Yes, there was the other aspect,
0:54:04 – 0:54:12 that Maren had compared the comparison with the hatred that an Aline Bachmann had received
0:54:12 – 0:54:20 Or a good one, which she did not mention, but which is also in the NWO discussion
0:54:20 – 0:54:29 with in – against a Rainer Winkler aka Drachenlord. And she might have noticed,
0:54:29 – 0:54:36 But in no way does it have any idea of what dynamics and what blatant deeds there are.
0:54:36 – 0:54:43 It's based on. and structures. Yes, then she has a Jasnero who still talks about Aline Bachmann.
0:54:43 – 0:54:49 tried to clear up and pack their deeds in a chronological order,
0:54:49 – 0:54:57 yes, then complained that this family of the dead Aisha was not left alone
0:54:57 – 0:55:05 Let's go. The brother asked the Jasnero to make reconnaissance material, which Aline
0:55:05 – 0:55:14 Bachmann did it with his sister. And then she goes and compares this massive
0:55:14 – 0:55:21 Hatred, which Alina Bachmann and a dragon lord get from the NWO and also from other people,
0:55:21 – 0:55:31 With what Flattermann gets, what Frank gets. So these are worlds you can't
0:55:31 – 0:55:36 compare with each other. So I can't compare an apple to a pear,
0:55:36 – 0:55:44 Because there's a sky-wide difference between hate and criticism, my dear. But also
0:55:44 – 0:55:49 You haven't understood this yet and I always find it very interesting and also a little bit,
0:55:49 – 0:55:55 Sorry to say that, stupid, in my opinion.
0:55:55 – 0:56:05 If you almost mention Just Nero and the NWO then and also in such a special context.
0:56:05 – 0:56:09 They're very special people.
0:56:09 – 0:56:16 If you go and think about weddings of hatred towards Rainer Winkler,
0:56:16 – 0:56:26 that there was a ski jumping festival there and that almost 10,000 people in a "no 50 souls" place
0:56:26 – 0:56:32 and stood at the door of Rainer Winkler's house. Then you can't do that with the
0:56:32 – 0:56:39 Compare the fact that the Frank Batter man gets a few nasty podcasts, a few nasty
0:56:39 – 0:56:46 Stories and from time to time real nasty commentary among his videos. This is not
0:56:46 – 0:56:51 comparable. It's not the same thing. When you look at these dragon lord groups
0:56:51 – 0:56:57 Look, and I think the Schanzen Broadcast is one of the biggest groups. There are
0:56:57 – 0:57:05 60,000 people in there who have nothing else to do but every single step of the way.
0:57:05 – 0:57:10 by Rainer Winkler and the same is true of Aline Bachmann.
0:57:10 – 0:57:21 Exactly and this is also just a group of many, with many members and although Rainer Winkler
0:57:21 – 0:57:27 has already lost everything and is offline, so it is still a huge topic and will always be
0:57:27 – 0:57:34 still mentioned and quoted daily in thousands of messages and his entire life and also his
0:57:34 – 0:57:40 Current life is still being analyzed and it is being followed at every turn. Please,
0:57:40 – 0:57:47 Maren, don't try such stories as a pure Winkler has experienced, with the one of
0:57:47 – 0:57:53 To compare Flattermanns or to what you get in terms of dynamics, because that is a
0:57:53 – 0:58:02 False factual claims. This is, to figuratively discuss, the one is an ocean and the other is an ocean.
0:58:02 – 0:58:06 And what you get is a fly shot on the white sheet of paper.
0:58:06 – 0:58:09 Yeah, a little puddle.
0:58:09 – 0:58:14 So a small drop of a tear.
0:58:14 – 0:58:25 Of course, death threats, threats of physical attacks and so on go far too far.
0:58:25 – 0:58:37 And you have to distance yourself from that. But you can't compare what happened there with what happened at Flattermann and Co.
0:58:37 – 0:58:43 No, I'm sorry, I don't understand that either. That's where my puke came up a bit.
0:58:43 – 0:58:51 Yes, because above all a great splendour was created by ignorance.
0:58:51 – 0:59:02 And as I said, Marin, a) you should inform yourself better and you should be better informed,
0:59:02 – 0:59:09 What I'm not going to do now, you should really pay attention to what you say in the live streams,
0:59:09 – 0:59:20 because the whole thing already presents itself as very, very questionable for people who are more familiar with such topics and are better informed.
0:59:20 – 0:59:29 Again, this is the victim narrative. How about you talk about what mistakes you've made in the past?
0:59:29 – 0:59:33 Because what you always hear is you're talking about other people's mistakes.
0:59:33 – 0:59:34 That's right.
0:59:34 – 0:59:41 But what you never hear are mistakes he made himself or mistakes you made.
0:59:41 – 0:59:53 And I mean, you've seen that on your own in the other livestream, where our Turkish emigrant was seen,
0:59:53 – 1:00:00 where you absolutely didn't let the other person have a say and totally disrespectful …
1:00:00 - 1:00:02 Just push away.
1:00:02 – 1:00:11 You've pushed him away and talked to him completely disrespectfully, but you're totally reflective and a moral authority.
1:00:11 – 1:00:15 So I have to say, the action was absolutely worthy of a Kalenta Wollny.
1:00:15 – 1:00:22 So Kralenta goes there, critics are blocked or muted or immediately kicked out.
1:00:22 – 1:00:25 Maren did the same.
1:00:25 – 1:00:31 Old Mike wanted to explain himself a bit and then zack, just go away.
1:00:31 – 1:00:45 Even Frank smiled and looked down, because even Frank thought the same thing at the moment as the spectators who were there.
1:00:45 – 1:00:53 And Frank was only a silent viewer in his own live stream and watched this dynamic.
1:00:53 - 1:01:00 And as I said, Maren, this behavior was so disrespectful.
1:01:00 – 1:01:03 You overreacted so much.
1:01:03 – 1:01:07 And also because you didn't let him talk out,
1:01:07 – 1:01:13 You've just seen what your true personality is.
1:01:13 – 1:01:17 And you don't have to present yourself as a moral authority.
1:01:17 – 1:01:21 Especially with half-knowledge, you don't shine with people who know better.
1:01:21 – 1:01:23 Do you know what I mean?
1:01:23 – 1:01:27 This may be true for the typical 08/15 people.
1:01:27 – 1:01:34 who has virtually no idea about certain topics and dynamics,
1:01:34 – 1:01:39 But from people who deal with issues a little bit,
1:01:39 – 1:01:42 It just seems ridiculous and unhelpful.
1:01:42 – 1:01:45 I'm sorry, Maren, but
1:01:45 – 1:01:47 You have to endure that, too.
1:01:47 – 1:01:49 Yes, that was
1:01:50 – 1:01:55 Really, uh, Cringe, to say that in youthful language.
1:01:55 – 1:01:58 Okay, let's get to the next block.
1:01:58 – 1:02:00 Oh, and Buru!
1:02:00 – 1:02:05 Do you know the Lautfangshop?
1:02:05 – 1:02:06 No, no.
1:02:06 – 1:02:09 No, what's up?
1:02:09 – 1:02:12 Well, stuff, then. Really some stuff.
1:02:12 – 1:02:16 T-shirts, cups, bags, everything you don't need.
1:02:16 – 1:02:17 Clack!
1:02:17 – 1:02:19 Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop, pop, pop, blink.
1:02:19 – 1:02:20 Exciting.
1:02:20 – 1:02:21 On trend.
1:02:25 – 1:02:29 It's not, but the prices are normal.
1:02:29 – 1:02:33 No extra charge for the design, no profit
1:02:33 – 1:02:37 Nix non profit, every Sucki directly to the board
1:02:37 – 1:02:41 Yes, Bake, Schopp, Bake, Schopp, Bake, Bake, Schopp, Schopp, Schopp, Schopp, Schopp
1:02:41 – 1:02:47 According to Schopp, Schopp, Laut came home to the well-groomed average
1:02:51 – 1:02:54 Absolutely unnecessary, but you fled!
1:02:54 – 1:03:05 [Music]
1:03:05 – 1:03:06 Stop it!
1:03:06 – 1:03:08 [Music]
1:03:08 – 1:03:10 Would you like to announce it?
1:03:10 – 1:03:13 The Flatterman of the Week.
1:03:13 – 1:03:16 The Flatterman of the Week.
1:03:16 – 1:03:19 And I have the honor today
1:03:19 – 1:03:25 And we're talking about the little livestream from Sunday, 14.09.
1:03:25 – 1:03:35 There are two particularly beautiful places in memory, because one had over any
1:03:35 – 1:03:44 Reality soap talked and it went over hot teeth behind closed doors,
1:03:44 – 1:03:50 The question is whether there will be any snorting on TV.
1:03:50 – 1:03:57 Pretty good content for a Sunday afternoon.
1:03:57 – 1:03:59 Livestream in the late afternoon.
1:03:59 – 1:04:02 So bravura, applö, applö, applö.
1:04:02 – 1:04:05 Yes, above all, that I somehow
1:04:05 – 1:04:10 In Frank's case, everything has to be about one thing at a time.
1:04:10 – 1:04:12 Yes, it must always be insulting.
1:04:12 – 1:04:17 Yes, one could already say that this is almost pathological, such a focus on it.
1:04:17 – 1:04:25 Yes, then there were also intimate details of Lina and Rain.
1:04:25 – 1:04:25 Oh, my God.
1:04:25 – 1:04:40 Yes, where one had speculated about whether Rain's blood penis actually undergoes such a great transformation between erroneous and not erroneous.
1:04:40 – 1:04:51 Yeah, that was one of those things where I had the feeling that Frank's wife found it a little uncomfortable.
1:04:51 – 1:04:58 But it was kind of a topic in this reality show that they were watching.
1:04:58 – 1:05:04 Yeah, and then there was one more thing the Flatterman didn't do now, but his wife did.
1:05:04 – 1:05:07 I mean, she's also called Butterman with surnames, so it fits.
1:05:07 – 1:05:09 Yeah, I'll tell you.
1:05:09 – 1:05:10 That's fine.
1:05:10 – 1:05:19 Well, I don't even know the context, I have to admit at this point, but
1:05:19 – 1:05:23 I definitely remember one sentence of it.
1:05:23 – 1:05:26 Sorry for taking it out of context.
1:05:26 – 1:05:27 It's evil.
1:05:27 – 1:05:35 But Christine said that Broken Heart Syndrome is a sudden cardiac arrest.
1:05:35 – 1:05:40 And my reaction to that when I heard that was, "How please?"
1:05:40 – 1:05:47 I laughed so hard and just shook my head.
1:05:47 – 1:05:53 because she also took such an explanatory position, where she wanted to explain to other people,
1:05:53 – 1:05:55 What is Broken Heart Syndrome?
1:05:55 – 1:05:59 And Broken Heart Syndrome is not a sudden cardiac arrest.
1:05:59 – 1:06:05 In fact, this is often mistaken for a broken heart syndrome with a heart attack.
1:06:05 – 1:06:11 Yes, but if you are now the English a bit powerful, then you might get broken,
1:06:11 – 1:06:18 That could mean something like broken and hard for the heart. if you put that together,
1:06:18 – 1:06:26 then you come to a broken heart. yes and what does that mean? quite simply,
1:06:26 – 1:06:32 many people, for example, if a partner separates, or if a partner dies, or you
1:06:32 – 1:06:39 is subjected to an unbelievable amount of stress and has emotionalities in it and the feelings
1:06:39 – 1:06:47 If you are overwhelmed, Broken Heart Syndrome can be similar to a heart attack.
1:06:47 – 1:06:53 Because he has pretty much the same symptoms. Speak, you have chest pain,
1:06:53 – 1:07:03 You get an oppressive feeling, get bad air, have this radiating pain
1:07:03 – 1:07:04 in the back and arms.
1:07:04 – 1:07:11 That's right, because the psyche also plays along at the point and actually it will be in the
1:07:11 – 1:07:17 At first, the rescue service also treated it as if it were a real heart attack.
1:07:17 – 1:07:25 But the ultra interesting thing is with Broken Heart Syndrome as soon as the stress returns
1:07:25 – 1:07:32 is over and the person calms down, everything normalizes again and it's all back
1:07:32 – 1:07:33 at the normal level.
1:07:33 – 1:07:40 In very rare cases, Broken Heart Syndrome can also be fatal.
1:07:40 – 1:07:45 This is because the symptoms are, of course, real at the moment.
1:07:45 – 1:07:51 Therefore, people with Broken Heart Syndrome must also be monitored in the intensive care unit.
1:07:51 – 1:08:00 And special monitoring is needed, including medication, sedatives,
1:08:00 – 1:08:03 You just want to take the person back to another level.
1:08:03 – 1:08:07 But this has nothing to do with an actual heart attack, even if the
1:08:07 – 1:08:10 The symptoms are similar.
1:08:10 – 1:08:14 So as I said, dear people, please don't let me tell you that Broken Heart Syndrome
1:08:14 – 1:08:20 It is a sudden cardiac arrest. Exactly. Sudden cardiac arrest,
1:08:20 – 1:08:24 If it doesn't happen in the hospital, it's 100 percent deadly.
1:08:24 – 1:08:31 Yes, so if the circuit stops and someone doesn't pump manually,
1:08:31 – 1:08:39 If you take life-computer emergency measures, then this is potentially fatal.
1:08:39 – 1:08:48 Yes, so, Christina, at the point when you meme the explainer, please pay attention to it in the future
1:08:48 – 1:08:52 And maybe you should googling a term first. I have this extra now too
1:08:52 – 1:08:59 very simply explained without technical terms, so that even the flatties understand this. Yes,
1:08:59 – 1:09:06 But that fits right there. Yes, then there is the very large topic complex
1:09:06 – 1:09:14 Flattermann's eyes and there is always the eye update. But we don't even want to stop
1:09:14 – 1:09:22 to the drama and the drama of the eyes, because the danger of becoming blind
1:09:22 – 1:09:27 I've talked to a lot of people, so I don't know anyone for whom
1:09:27 – 1:09:33 Not what is very unpleasant, which is very scary. And I have the deepest
1:09:33 – 1:09:39 Understand that you have a huge shot when you are affected by it yourself
1:09:39 – 1:09:52 is. But what we noticed, there was a comment on a story that was posted,
1:09:52 – 1:09:59 I don't know if it was "Dress Chimey" or "It's Julia", that was "Karma does so
1:09:59 – 1:10:05 blind. And of course our good flutterman in old manner is immediately on it
1:10:05 – 1:10:11 He jumped in and, of course, was indignant about it and immediately pushed himself back into the role of victim.
1:10:11 – 1:10:21 So I found that completely wrong again, because it lacks the context to "Karma makes blind".
1:10:21 – 1:10:28 How does karma blind us? Is that on him? Is it coined on someone else?
1:10:28 – 1:10:36 Is that so in general? Is it based on the actual blindness of the blind or of the
1:10:36 – 1:10:41 The metaphor you're talking about? If it was against him now, it is, of course, maximally malicious.
1:10:41 – 1:10:48 Of course and also inappropriate and not right. But he had to go back immediately,
1:10:48 – 1:10:55 make a story about it and then really present yourself as a victim again, what a worse,
1:10:55 – 1:11:02 Worse, worse person can only post such a thing and he gets all the hatred off. So I found
1:11:02 – 1:11:07 that also the … my God, I would have excited myself at home about it like anything else and would have it
1:11:07 – 1:11:15 otherwise smirked away. Yes, Frank is also looking for formal. He needs that. More is needed
1:11:15 – 1:11:22 Not to say that. Then, of course, it had to be mentioned several times that I did so.
1:11:22 – 1:11:28 He had understood how he had been there in his reel and also in his YouTube short story,
1:11:28 – 1:11:34 a short video, had described that he had just walked past the hospital,
1:11:34 – 1:11:40 five kilometers, although this is only somehow 800 meters away, because he also money
1:11:40 – 1:11:44 He needed a taxi so he could get there and so on and so forth. Because you're in a taxi
1:11:44 – 1:11:53 You can't pay by card. Dear, dear Frank, a short internet search has revealed,
1:11:53 – 1:12:02 that all taxis from the Taxicentrale in Augsburg and/or surroundings all have a
1:12:02 – 1:12:08 Card reader are equipped. Then we thought, well, let's have a look,
1:12:08 – 1:12:15 What it looks like, so 50 kilometers around the place you specified from your mailbox.
1:12:15 – 1:12:25 And behold, the taxis even advertise with photos on Google that they have card readers.
1:12:25 – 1:12:32 And of course we have also looked at the websites of the various taxi companies,
1:12:32 – 1:12:40 even have an extra phone call, especially with taxi companies near you, when
1:12:40 – 1:12:46 presumed place of residence, in quotation marks, extra called again and assures us,
1:12:46 – 1:12:52 You can also pay by card. And that was confirmed to us.
1:12:52 – 1:12:57 Bam, bam, bam. And now I would like you, dear Frank, to prove that it is not so,
1:12:57 – 1:13:02 because dear Flattis, because he laughs like shit, sorry at the place, but it is just so,
1:13:02 – 1:13:08 He just wants to talk himself out again, because he's not concerned with the option.
1:13:08 – 1:13:12 has or has no money for a taxi, whatever, is not important at the point,
1:13:12 – 1:13:23 But you can see in the videos how he lies. Point. Your good Frank is so credible. This
1:13:23 – 1:13:32 are facts. Facts? True, facts are not claims, because you can, yes,
1:13:32 – 1:13:36 Like I said, any of you can do that. I mean ….
1:13:36 – 1:13:39 It'll take you two minutes. I like to have a morning in bed.
1:13:39 – 1:13:46 I went and called all the taxi companies. By the way, they are really nice
1:13:46 – 1:13:54 Take a taxi. Yeah, actually. So you can't say that everywhere. But Frank said
1:13:54 – 1:14:02 Also in his livestream, that it may be the case in big cities. In fact, I have to be Frank.
1:14:02 – 1:14:09 Right on some points. There are certain spots in Germany, especially in very rural areas.
1:14:09 – 1:14:15 Areas where this is actually not yet the case, but where you can also order a taxi days in advance
1:14:15 – 1:14:23 You have to be able to take a taxi at all. You can almost do it a few days before
1:14:23 – 1:14:27 Withdraw money and make sure you have money. And by the way, now one more point, because then
1:14:27 – 1:14:35 If you don't have cash, what do you do? Quite simply, I have
1:14:35 – 1:14:40 Even when I was younger and was celebrating with friends, for example. I then had to
1:14:40 – 1:14:45 Go home at night because there is no public transport. You can drive a car
1:14:45 – 1:14:51 Even when you've been drinking. If you don't do it, you can't. You have to
1:14:51 – 1:14:56 Call a taxi, of course. Then what do you do? Either you're lucky and you know one
1:14:56 – 1:15:00 Taxi driver and you say, yes, let's go to the ATM, I'll give you right away
1:15:00 – 1:15:06 The money and then it fits. Or, what also works for every taxi driver, as well as
1:15:06 – 1:15:11 at every gas station, by the way, when you refuel and realize that you have no money with you,
1:15:11 – 1:15:16 you give this taxi driver as long as the identity card, driver's license etc. pp.,
1:15:16 – 1:15:23 then goes to a cash machine, withdraws money and gives the taxi driver the money,
1:15:23 – 1:15:26 because his pledge, he has his security, if he runs away,
1:15:26 – 1:15:32 In any case, he will be able to ask for the cash and, if necessary, the money
1:15:32 – 1:15:38 can be invited and that is something that
1:15:38 – 1:15:40 all taxi drivers out of goodwill, because
1:15:40 – 1:15:41 How often do you get a taxi?
1:15:41 – 1:15:45 You have to take what you don't
1:15:45 – 1:15:47 It has been planned and there you have to
1:15:47 – 1:15:48 You have an option if you don't have money.
1:15:48 – 1:15:51 At least you have to have at least the
1:15:51 – 1:15:53 Possibility to take a taxi for a short time
1:15:53 – 1:15:57 ATMs to drive. So to
1:15:57 – 1:16:00 Excuses are our dear Flatty
1:15:57 – 1:16:07 Sorry, Flattermann of course not embarrassed, but good, he can continue to stage himself as he likes.
1:16:07 – 1:16:12 Had you not asked the acquaintance, who was himself a taxi driver,
1:16:12 – 1:16:22 that there will not be another regulation soon, that there must be a cashless payment option at the taxis nationwide?
1:16:22 – 1:16:36 So yes, because I don't only have a friend, but I recently spoke to a taxi driver when I needed a taxi myself.
1:16:36 – 1:16:47 Soon all taxis that don't have one will have 100.% Seat contacts have GPS tracking on all seats, just as taxis have GPS tracking.
1:16:47 – 1:16:53 It will definitely be introduced in the future in such a way that it is planned in the next few years,
1:16:53 – 1:17:00 This means that you can definitely pay with a card in all taxis.
1:17:00 – 1:17:10 And yes, Frank, at this point, as I said, just say in the future, no, about
1:17:10 – 1:17:14 I really haven't thought about the option.
1:17:14 – 1:17:20 or say "I don't know, I didn't have money for it" but he didn't have to say that.
1:17:20 – 1:17:25 You can just say, "I hadn't thought about it, it wasn't an option for me."
1:17:25 – 1:17:29 Instead of telling some shit in a video.
1:17:29 – 1:17:35 This just makes you inauthentic and it shows, as I said, that you are lying.
1:17:35 – 1:17:39 information that is publicly and openly available.
1:17:39 – 1:17:47 On lautflaunt.de, the Onlyfans account, where you are guaranteed not to see naked skin.
1:17:47 – 1:17:49 Uh, let's...
1:17:49 – 1:17:50 What's wrong with that?
1:17:50 – 1:17:56 Well, everything that happened to land on my phone last week.
1:17:56 – 1:18:02 Screenshots, shaky photos of lunch,
1:18:02 – 1:18:07 Maybe a 4-second video of a cable I fixed.
1:18:07 – 1:18:16 So? Just everyday rubbish. Exactly, but exclusively, because why not?
1:18:16 – 1:18:27 Puff, sound catcher! The content you didn't miss, but can now have.
1:18:27 – 1:18:40 No erotic content, no refund, zero more like.
1:18:40 – 1:18:54 And then we come to our next section, the explanatory videos,
1:18:54 – 1:19:04 Or the "I explain myself" videos. Frank felt compelled to watch a video of Trashtime
1:19:04 – 1:19:13 Let's face it again, because it was about the problems that Mike had in another one.
1:19:13 – 1:19:21 Video of, or in another live even, of Bataman had piled up where he reported
1:19:21 – 1:19:29 had that he now has massive personal consequences from the interview, what he did with Frank
1:19:29 – 1:19:34 He had lost his job, he was subjected to hostility.
1:19:34 – 1:19:43 And yes, then Trash Time wanted to make me another video with Mike to
1:19:43 – 1:19:49 give him another room, after Maren had told him how he wanted to explain himself,
1:19:49 – 1:19:58 He just stole it and threw it back and forth. Yes, and that's where he tried,
1:19:58 – 1:20:05 And then he said, "There's something here and there." But that was
1:20:05 – 1:20:15 Somehow mischievous, because before that Frank knew that the trash-time dar, which is in the preparation,
1:20:15 – 1:20:24 He made hints that there might be a hole, a whistleblower at Trash-Timey or Mike.
1:20:24 – 1:20:28 Interesting.
1:20:28 – 1:20:37 But it has not been talked about in any way that Mike stops really wild statements and
1:20:37 – 1:20:44 He was in the livestream with his wife.
1:20:44 – 1:20:47 What we really wanted to talk about,
1:20:47 – 1:20:50 However, due to the current development, they have been thrown out.
1:20:50 – 1:21:01 And Maren had then taken a survey, just in the live chat,
1:21:01 – 1:21:04 I wonder if people would donate to Mike.
1:21:04 – 1:21:08 would donate. And only at the beginning, how Mike came to be there, you have to do something
1:21:08 – 1:21:13 Instead of the chat in there. You have to help him. After that he made all his wild statements.
1:21:13 – 1:21:21 When I did, it looked different. And in this live where Maren made the poll
1:21:21 – 1:21:29 The chat was clearly of the opinion that we would not support Mike.
1:21:29 – 1:21:40 Especially since Maren did this again on the spot out of malice, because on that day was
1:21:40 – 1:21:49 Yes Maren a real Karen in the place. That's why the poll turned out to be a vicious one.
1:21:49 – 1:21:57 emphasized, however that may be. Many people wouldn't have the right and the right to think.
1:21:57 – 1:22:02 support and, above all, in contrast to other people in the live stream
1:22:02 – 1:22:09 There is no stage for it. But yes. Then there was the thing, the big debate about it,
1:22:09 – 1:22:19 that Trash Time would continue with stories about him on Instagram and again and again
1:22:19 – 1:22:29 Frank would step around and post one story at a time. And interestingly, it was
1:22:29 – 1:22:38 Today, after the live streams on Trash Time, it's again possible to hear that Frank
1:22:38 – 1:22:47 often writes privately and shares information from others, shares private messages, and
1:22:47 – 1:22:54 And somehow you have the feeling that if you listen to all this, that Frank
1:22:54 – 1:23:00 communicates to the outside that he wants to have peace and to reconcile with everyone, but
1:23:00 – 1:23:08 He goes back and forth again and again and incites the whole discussion around him by
1:23:08 – 1:23:13 People who haven't talked to him for weeks, and we've noticed that,
1:23:13 – 1:23:21 if we haven't done anything about Frank for three weeks, that we have been thematized over and over again in his live shows.
1:23:21 – 1:23:32 He talks about people, addresses them, even picks up posts that were not about him at all, but about others.
1:23:32 – 1:23:38 And he almost always brings himself into the consciousness of the people.
1:23:38 – 1:23:44 And that's what he tried to portray over and over again in these "I explain myself" videos.
1:23:44 – 1:23:48 He is the good and everyone else is the bad.
1:23:48 – 1:23:52 Yeah, but now imagine he wouldn't.
1:23:52 – 1:23:58 He would be terribly afraid for his clicks, for his call numbers,
1:23:58 – 1:24:02 which is now felt to be his only source of income,
1:24:02 – 1:24:06 where he even asked people when he was in the hospital,
1:24:06 – 1:24:16 You should watch his other videos, because he needs paras, he has to be able to finance all this somehow.
1:24:16 – 1:24:27 If that were quiet now, or if he were really just going to turn off original retro content, or even post it in the stories,
1:24:27 – 1:24:31 Then it would be damn quiet around him and he knows that very well.
1:24:31 – 1:24:40 And that's why the beef has to be lit again and again, because it just mustn't be quiet,
1:24:40 – 1:24:46 Nomi, because then the fans disappear and the coal disappears and then it sees completely,
1:24:46 – 1:24:48 Very bad for Frank.
1:24:48 – 1:24:56 But that's exactly what Maren, Hotte, Michael and Frank accuse the others of.
1:24:56 – 1:24:56 Yes, yes.
1:24:56 – 1:25:04 For example, with us, we have not monetized YouTube. This podcast is not
1:25:04 – 1:25:10 monetized. Sure, there's a bit of advertising on the website, but you can
1:25:10 – 1:25:16 Enjoy things completely without advertising by downloading the podcast with a podcatcher,
1:25:16 – 1:25:22 Listen on Spotify, watch on YouTube and it's all completely ad-free. And
1:25:22 – 1:25:27 And we don't earn a single penny with this project.
1:25:27 – 1:25:40 But he accuses everyone else of doing this only because they make money monetarily.
1:25:40 – 1:25:43 Yeah, but that's not what we're talking about.
1:25:43 – 1:25:54 We are concerned with educating about grievances on the net and about people who almost completely beat the strings.
1:25:54 – 1:25:59 It's about putting these people in the loop.
1:25:59 – 1:26:08 And this is our mission. Our mission is not to become famous, generate thousands of clicks or somehow earn coal.
1:26:08 – 1:26:15 It's never been our thing. Our thing is to be loud at the place where you should be loud and
1:26:15 – 1:26:22 Don't look away. And if you consider the name of this format rectal-digital, where it comes from,
1:26:22 – 1:26:31 This is a medical examination in which you have two fingers, preferably index fingers.
1:26:31 – 1:26:37 and inserts the middle finger into the anus of a person and thus scans the rectum.
1:26:37 – 1:26:46 Digital for two fingers, Digitus, and rectal for the rectum, for the asshole.
1:26:46 – 1:26:53 And when you put it together, you realize that it's all about
1:26:53 – 1:26:57 an anal examination of the rectum.
1:26:57 – 1:27:04 In connection with the intro, where a modem dials into the Internet and then fart and
1:27:04 – 1:27:10 Shit sounds come, you can maybe pull yourself together, rhyme that it's around here
1:27:10 – 1:27:16 all the shit and bullshit and crap that exists on the internet, just
1:27:16 – 1:27:21 in a satirical, sarcastic and perhaps informative way
1:27:21 – 1:27:22 will.
1:27:22 – 1:27:25 That's it, that's it.
1:27:25 – 1:27:34 Right and dear Frank, we are already looking forward to the countless tips again in the live formats.
1:27:34 – 1:27:35 Oh yeah and the whole HEMA.
1:27:35 – 1:27:43 Yeah, and Lina and all that. We are happy and we will say until soon at the place.
1:27:43 – 1:27:57 We say thank you. 40 years, the floppers and goodbye. Don't you want to say goodbye? Farewell to you!
1:27:57 – 1:28:03 That's it with the file, Flattermann, Episode 4
1:28:03 – 1:28:11 We looked deep again And this time not only exposed the nakedness
1:28:11 – 1:28:13 But the basic values are equal to
1:28:13 – 1:28:25 While Lina continues to run away Frank commutes back and forth between victim image and mockery
1:28:25 – 1:28:33 And the whole circus is based on livestreams with pups jokes, blood pennies and half-knowledge
1:28:33 – 1:28:36 There is an inconvenient truth
1:28:36 – 1:28:40 This is no longer about entertainment.
1:28:40 – 1:28:46 Who consumes Flattermans content, dives into a biotope
1:28:46 – 1:28:50 in which empathy becomes a pose, criticism is considered an attack
1:28:50 – 1:28:54 Incitement is confused with attitude.
1:28:54 – 1:29:07 We have taken them apart again piece by piece, statement by statement
1:29:07 – 1:29:12 At the end of the day, they are not just in front of a digital pile of shards.
1:29:12 – 1:29:15 It's about something you have to honestly call that.
1:29:15 – 1:29:19 Abysses of humanity, who puts himself above others,
1:29:19 – 1:29:23 but does not show an attitude, he does not remain superior,
1:29:23 – 1:29:25 It's just debunked!
1:29:25 – 1:29:29 Until the next episode
1:29:29 – 1:29:32 by Rektal Digital
1:29:32 – 1:29:35 The Flattermann file
1:29:35 – 1:29:39 [Music]

In this episode of Rectal digital Let's open the file again. Flattermann – and it is no less absurd than before.
From Lina's mirrored explanatory videos to Christine's medical misunderstandings to Frank's taxi drama, we dissect the highlights (and low points) of a week full of live streams, outrage and victim narratives.

We are talking about:

Why Broken Heart Syndrome is not a sudden cardiac arrest
How half-knowledge and perpetrator-victim conversion to content are made
The AI song scandal around Hotte and the question of respect
Frank's eye updates, taxi excuses and endless whining
Foreign shame moments from pupstalk to blood penis

Satirical, snappy and without protection: We look where others look – and once again end up in the midst of the digital abysses of humanity.

Thematic breakdown

Intro & Welcome
– Presentation of the episode, Call to Action, spontaneous change of themes through current events.
Linas explainer video & Mirror-inverted illustration
– Blockages, spikes, explainer bear content and the follower discussion.
– Criticism of doxxing behaviour and false victimhood.
Origins & Dynamics of the Flattermann Bubble
– How to get into it at all.
– Resonance after the first episodes of the podcast.
– Solidarity, breaks and soap opera character.
Tips and Triggers in the Flattermann Cosmos
– ‘Scrap radio’ tip, language patterns (‘so to speak’), victim narratives.
Critical Statements on Racism
– Discussion on ‘racism against whites’.
– Enlightenment that xenophobia is ≠ racism.
Contextual statements & Victim role
– Livestream debates on eye injections, 50 people vs. 50 men.
– Victim staging and reversal logic.
Linas Crossing Borders with Care Level Allegations
– Attack on Sascha’s illness and care situation.
– Ethical limits and possible legal consequences.
Livestream of Maren, Frank, Hotte & Michael
– Intended subject: AI song by Hotte.
– Scandal over Yvonne's dying friend.
– Perpetrator-victim reversal, shift of guilt and lack of empathy.
Sacrifice Narratives & Comparisons with Dragon Lord / Aline Bachmann
– Inadmissible comparisons of hate dynamics.
– Lack of differentiation between criticism and hate speech.
Disrespect in Livestream
– Dealing with guest ‘Old Mike’.
– Violent conduct, lack of reflection.
The Flatterman of the Week
– Foreign shame content: Pupstalk, blood penis details.
– Christine misrepresents Broken Heart Syndrome.
– Information on the medical facts.
Frank's Eye Drama & Taxi Story
– Victim presentation and false statements on card payment.
– Search and refute the allegations.
Explanatory videos & Reversal of guilt
– Mike's statements, lost job, right-wing tendencies.
– Trash time, accusations, malice in the bubble.
Conclusion: Victim role vs. reality
– Frank lives from tips, provocations and clicks.
– Abysses of humanity in content form.
– Satirical summary and outlook.
Outro
– Summary, ironic conclusion.