| transcript | |
|---|---|
|
00:00 - 0:00:17
[Music]
|
|
|
0:00:17 – 0:00:19
Hello and welcome to a new edition
|
|
|
0:00:19 – 0:00:23
The diversion. I'm Sascha
|
|
|
0:00:23 – 0:00:27
Markman and I swore, no, I
|
|
|
0:00:23 – 0:00:32
Stay away from the subject regularly. Today's topic is kind of a fever dream. But
|
|
|
0:00:32 – 0:00:39
Let's get back to the current status. I apologise that last week there was no
|
|
|
0:00:39 – 0:00:45
There was a consequence or two weeks ago there was no consequence, because I had a full-fledged
|
|
|
0:00:45 – 0:00:55
He stayed and was sick. Yes, that's what you get when you go to the doctor and wait in the waiting room
|
|
|
0:00:55 – 0:01:02
30 other people who have all coughed and cuddled and no one has any kind of protective mask
|
|
|
0:01:02 – 0:01:11
He wore it. Conclusion, I will not go to the doctor without a mask, because this was the second time,
|
|
|
0:01:11 – 0:01:14
I went to the doctor and got sick again.
|
|
|
0:01:14 – 0:01:30
Yes, today's topic. A fever dream. So the first 20 percent for a partially secured
|
|
|
0:01:30 – 0:01:40
Right-wing extremist party, the AfD. Wow. I really had to swallow. I mean with the CDU,
|
|
|
0:01:40 – 0:01:50
With 28 percent or so, I'm not quite as fine now, but the 20 percent for the
|
|
|
0:01:50 – 0:01:57
I think the AfD is strong. We have to live with that first. And a Friedrich Merz as
|
|
|
0:01:57 – 0:02:06
candidate for chancellor. But the fever dream goes even further. I mean, after Donald Trump won the U.S. election.
|
|
|
0:02:06 – 0:02:12
has won and somehow shortly after its introduction, already during its introduction,
|
|
|
0:02:12 – 0:02:22
signed one of his directives and "execute" blablabla and banged out so many
|
|
|
0:02:22 – 0:02:32
has like no other and blatant things, there was now a meeting on the weekend between
|
|
|
0:02:32 – 0:02:38
Zelensky under Trump and the first thing you did, you got yourself
|
|
|
0:02:38 – 0:02:40
Funny why he doesn't wear a suit.
|
|
|
0:02:40 – 0:02:47
I mean everyone who's been following this for three years
|
|
|
0:02:47 – 0:02:57
He knew that the man had been wearing suits before.
|
|
|
0:02:57 – 0:03:04
This robbery, since the war there, he does not do that anymore. Now you could go and
|
|
|
0:03:04 – 0:03:11
Think about why you're doing it, but reduce it instead. me
|
|
|
0:03:11 – 0:03:16
It felt like it was in the schoolyard, where you chose a classmate,
|
|
|
0:03:16 – 0:03:23
which can now be bullied to the ground for no reason. Yes, and what happened next,
|
|
|
0:03:23 – 0:03:31
With your forefinger outstretched, you are the one who is to blame for all, and you are the one who is to blame.
|
|
|
0:03:31 – 0:03:42
It provokes the third world. This is total perpetrator-victim conversion and such modes of speech,
|
|
|
0:03:42 – 0:03:50
Thoughts, actions I know only of maximum daffodils, if they go with their
|
|
|
0:03:50 – 0:04:01
Gaslighting, depending on how you pronounce it, distorts reality and actually
|
|
|
0:04:01 – 0:04:10
The victim is the perpetrator. And that happened there. These are such clothes, events, happenings,
|
|
|
0:04:10 – 0:04:16
where I didn't think I would experience it again somehow. We have seen,
|
|
|
0:04:16 – 0:04:25
In the first administration of Trump, that there were already febertraum-like conditions,
|
|
|
0:04:25 – 0:04:32
So there you were just before the 41 degree body temperature, but now we are actually
|
|
|
0:04:32 – 0:04:38
already at the point where the proteins start to coagulate and the body is close to it,
|
|
|
0:04:38 – 0:04:49
cessation of activity. I mean, in other words, the world has been just as it has been since then.
|
|
|
0:04:49 – 0:04:59
At the end of the Second World War, the alliance between America, Europe and
|
|
|
0:04:59 – 0:05:05
In other parts of the world, this kind of support was almost cancelled.
|
|
|
0:05:05 – 0:05:12
I mean, it's not a good deal for America. And I find this approach,
|
|
|
0:05:12 – 0:05:23
that you react to a country like an entrepreneur, a big company, totally wrong and also so
|
|
|
0:05:23 – 0:05:32
A lot of bananas. If you think about it, now we come to the digressive part of this
|
|
|
0:05:32 – 0:05:42
The whole thing. What happened when the Harz laws were introduced? There was someone
|
|
|
0:05:42 – 0:05:48
Successfully brought out of the economy, who had once made a cassation,
|
|
|
0:05:48 – 0:05:56
after Gerhard Schröder became chancellor and then looked at how to make money now
|
|
|
0:05:56 – 0:06:03
You can save with what measures. And then there were the Hartz laws, especially in the
|
|
|
0:06:03 – 0:06:15
Fourth, unemployment benefit and social assistance combined to unemployment benefit II,
|
|
|
0:06:15 – 0:06:27
Hartz IV for short. Strangely enough, the following happened. Germany became export world champion.
|
|
|
0:06:27 – 0:06:36
The economy was great, really good. Strangely enough, the workers have
|
|
|
0:06:36 – 0:06:45
Not benefiting at all. Since the introduction of these laws, wage levels have become lower and lower.
|
|
|
0:06:45 – 0:06:56
The profits of companies are increasing. What's that for? Could it be that people are afraid
|
|
|
0:06:56 – 0:07:05
or were afraid to fall into unemployment benefit 2, because at that time you had to pay even small
|
|
|
0:07:05 – 0:07:11
sell apartment because you could live on it and make other things into money,
|
|
|
0:07:11 – 0:07:20
because you could live from it and get completely naked in front of the agency for work or back then
|
|
|
0:07:20 – 0:07:33
Working groups, the AGs, which were there to get performance. And so you have
|
|
|
0:07:33 – 0:07:41
Take any job, no matter how badly paid it was, just so you don't get in there. There are
|
|
|
0:07:41 – 0:07:47
Yes, now a party that has gotten 20 percent, which has also said that you get
|
|
|
0:07:47 – 0:07:55
benefits, such as unemployment benefit or unemployment benefit or citizen benefit, somehow
|
|
|
0:07:55 – 0:08:01
That sort of thing. If you have paid in so many months or years, if you
|
|
|
0:08:01 – 0:08:08
would like to have the same performance, the same duration of performance as is currently available, would have to
|
|
|
0:08:08 – 0:08:16
You have been employed by the AfD for 39 years, so that you are unemployed for two years.
|
|
|
0:08:16 – 0:08:22
Get the money. Otherwise, it's only a few months. I think six or so is in the party program
|
|
|
0:08:22 – 0:08:29
inside. And then for every additional month you have to be busy for a year. Make one
|
|
|
0:08:29 – 0:08:36
so that actually even more fear to fall into this performance, because then you
|
|
|
0:08:36 – 0:08:44
Could wages be pushed further to re-invigorate the economy? Because it is
|
|
|
0:08:44 – 0:08:51
Yes, it is an open secret that the countries around us all say yes, yes, Germany is not
|
|
|
0:08:51 – 0:08:59
only the puff of Europe, but also a low-wage country and in some places also quite a
|
|
|
0:08:59 – 0:09:14
Tax haven. But if you ask our politicians, you can have high incomes and high values, goods and services.
|
|
|
0:09:14 – 0:09:21
Do not inherit taxes, because then everyone would disappear from Germany. Strangely enough,
|
|
|
0:09:21 – 0:09:26
If you talk to billionaires or even read interviews from them,
|
|
|
0:09:26 – 0:09:35
A lot of people say we'd like to pay more taxes, but we can't. Good,
|
|
|
0:09:35 – 0:09:42
Then I wonder why they don't go there and go on a grand scale, because of me too.
|
|
|
0:09:42 – 0:09:48
publicly effective, socially engaged and then stop projects such as the board or other things
|
|
|
0:09:48 – 0:09:58
They are very supportive financially. I mean, you have to imagine the normal
|
|
|
0:09:58 – 0:10:05
mortal man here in Germany can't imagine how much is a million.
|
|
|
0:10:05 – 0:10:14
So if I go now, count from one to a million and average one second
|
|
|
0:10:14 – 0:10:22
I need to sit there for 11 days. And then I do it 24 hours. Of course,
|
|
|
0:10:22 – 0:10:26
if I want to sleep eight hours in between and then I can count 16 hours,
|
|
|
0:10:26 – 0:10:34
but then there are other things, food, washing, toilets, then I still need
|
|
|
0:10:34 – 0:10:41
longer. But let's say you now count 24 hours, one second for a number and that's
|
|
|
0:10:41 – 0:10:51
It's already difficult, because to larger numbers 586.347, I need longer for more than a second.
|
|
|
0:10:51 – 0:10:57
But we'll do it for the bill. And if I do the same until a billion,
|
|
|
0:10:57 – 0:11:04
because that's a thousand times, because a billion is a thousand million, that's not
|
|
|
0:11:04 – 0:11:12
Only 11 days, that's a few.
|
|
|
0:11:12 – 0:11:18
year. That's almost 32 years.
|
|
|
0:11:18 – 0:11:21
I think something like 31.7. This is
|
|
|
0:11:21 – 0:11:24
A lot, that's a long time. So just so to
|
|
|
0:11:24 – 0:11:29
understanding. A million eleven days,
|
|
|
0:11:29 – 0:11:33
1 billion 31 and 32 respectively
|
|
|
0:11:29 – 0:11:40
years. It's hard to imagine, isn't it? So even if a billionaire has 10 million
|
|
|
0:11:40 – 0:11:50
If he withdraws, donates or has to pay taxes in the course of a certain period of time, he will not be able to do so.
|
|
|
0:11:50 – 0:12:04
because they have such high incomes, incomes and even from passive work, because dividends from
|
|
|
0:12:04 – 0:12:09
leasing, leasing and so on, this is not a job that I have now actively done,
|
|
|
0:12:09 – 0:12:15
It happens on its own that you don't even notice it. And that's how they argue,
|
|
|
0:12:15 – 0:12:22
So from these billionaires, the Germans, who would all run away if there were a
|
|
|
0:12:22 – 0:12:28
Wealth tax, wealth tax, or whatever. Yeah, it's kind of hard, isn't it?
|
|
|
0:12:28 – 0:12:39
Yes, yes. Why is it now that you want to stop this West-East thing,
|
|
|
0:12:39 – 0:12:46
We want to end this support for Europe from an American point of view. Why
|
|
|
0:12:46 – 0:12:54
Is the East, i.e. Putin and China, interested in the West or in Europe?
|
|
|
0:12:54 – 0:13:03
Well, from an economic point of view, Europe is not a huge number compared to others,
|
|
|
0:13:03 – 0:13:09
China has also overtaken Germany as the world export champion. But it is after all
|
|
|
0:13:09 – 0:13:15
It is still a very big economic power, because as we have just learned,
|
|
|
0:13:15 – 0:13:22
due to the special circumstances, especially in Germany, and we also have good products
|
|
|
0:13:22 – 0:13:32
production, not only cars, but also other industrial products, controls for industrial plants,
|
|
|
0:13:32 – 0:13:38
then in Europe, other products are produced that Dutch build, the only machines,
|
|
|
0:13:38 – 0:13:46
They are capable of producing processors. It is also the only company in the world that
|
|
|
0:13:46 – 0:13:53
Dispose of these things. And the Chinese are also so embarrassed by the suffering,
|
|
|
0:13:53 – 0:13:59
Because the halt these high-tech products do not get through sanctions. In any case, can
|
|
|
0:13:59 – 0:14:07
If Europe is weak, its business and activities will be at a different level.
|
|
|
0:14:07 – 0:14:17
Is it as if Europe is strong? Economically, militarily. I had the days
|
|
|
0:14:17 – 0:14:28
It was such a debate that Europe should now be united. Who is a colleague
|
|
|
0:14:28 – 0:14:33
the view that an economic union, as we had before the EU, would be perfectly sufficient.
|
|
|
0:14:33 – 0:14:45
Among other things, it was thought that Europe would not be able to do this. There are too many individual candidates.
|
|
|
0:14:45 – 0:14:51
Too many opinions and ideally this will be a dystopia and in the worst case
|
|
|
0:14:51 – 0:14:56
Everyone would go to the gargles because no one would get along with each other.
|
|
|
0:14:56 – 0:15:09
I don't know what to think about it. I think Europe should be more united.
|
|
|
0:15:09 – 0:15:17
I know a lot of people think the European Parliament is talking too much into it.
|
|
|
0:15:17 – 0:15:29
concerns of the country. But if we somehow still want to have an importance and don't sink
|
|
|
0:15:29 – 0:15:36
want to go into insignificance if the countries such as Africa or also in South America
|
|
|
0:15:36 – 0:15:46
and parts of Asia will become stronger – and they will – and we need to be more united.
|
|
|
0:15:46 – 0:15:56
to be. Just like America. America was also a lot of states. And we have seen,
|
|
|
0:15:56 – 0:16:03
after the Second World War, where people had come closer and closer and
|
|
|
0:16:03 – 0:16:11
approximated that trade within Europe, the free movement of persons and also the common
|
|
|
0:16:11 – 0:16:17
Currency and I know there are a lot of people scolding the euro because it makes everything so expensive,
|
|
|
0:16:17 – 0:16:28
Europe has been getting better and better. Of course, no system is perfect and there are always
|
|
|
0:16:28 – 0:16:36
Mistakes and problems, but on the whole we are doing better. I can do without problems,
|
|
|
0:16:36 – 0:16:43
thanks to freedom of movement and open borders, go over to Holland for shopping and
|
|
|
0:16:43 – 0:16:49
back again. And as a Dutchman, I can go to Germany and go back without
|
|
|
0:16:49 – 0:16:55
I stand at the border for hours without running the risk of them taking my car apart.
|
|
|
0:16:55 – 0:17:00
I come from a time when you had to stop regularly at the border and get your IDs.
|
|
|
0:17:00 – 0:17:08
show. I didn't find it funny every time. And if anyone had a package, a pound of coffee
|
|
|
0:17:08 – 0:17:15
Too much, you had to be scared. Or you had too much gas in the canister,
|
|
|
0:17:15 – 0:17:21
Because the stuff was more expensive in Holland than in Germany. Then you really have problems
|
|
|
0:17:21 – 0:17:29
I got it. It's going to be expensive. However, I think we need to be stronger.
|
|
|
0:17:29 – 0:17:36
The next point is alternative news.
|
|
|
0:17:36 – 0:17:45
Alternative news sites, News.
|
|
|
0:17:45 – 0:17:50
Yeah, that's an issue, too.
|
|
|
0:17:50 – 0:17:53
I am here with my circle of acquaintances,
|
|
|
0:17:53 – 0:18:02
He is very knowledgeable in these areas and accuses me, because I
|
|
|
0:18:02 – 0:18:11
Read the system press or even take a look at the Tagesschau or the topics of the day that
|
|
|
0:18:11 – 0:18:19
I'm totally indoctrinated with this system press. And let's be honest,
|
|
|
0:18:19 – 0:18:32
I believe that journalism has an independent source of income. Better than someone,
|
|
|
0:18:32 – 0:18:40
There's someone behind it, a publishing house. Behind the publishing house
|
|
|
0:18:40 – 0:18:46
other interests. There are people with money. And if you look at the star, the mirror,
|
|
|
0:18:46 – 0:18:51
If you look at the focus, then you see again and again that there is such a certain coloration
|
|
|
0:18:51 – 0:19:00
It's inside. Then e-mails appear in such a way that someone, the editor-in-chief of the BILD, says,
|
|
|
0:19:00 – 0:19:11
We need to push the FDP. And again and again there are such indications or
|
|
|
0:19:11 – 0:19:18
or even a message, where the boss, the owner of the publisher has said,
|
|
|
0:19:18 – 0:19:21
We have to go in that and that direction.
|
|
|
0:19:21 – 0:19:25
Now you could say, yes, but Sascha, you're full of gays now.
|
|
|
0:19:25 – 0:19:34
No, there are journalists who are financed by a penalty payment by independents,
|
|
|
0:19:34 – 0:19:38
Let's just uncover those things.
|
|
|
0:19:38 – 0:19:42
I mean, in the end, all we can do is sit down, look at everything, and take a look at ourselves.
|
|
|
0:19:42 – 0:19:48
Form an opinion. Only I think that if I were a journalist who
|
|
|
0:19:48 – 0:19:55
I don't have to pay attention to how I work and what I do and I get a
|
|
|
0:19:55 – 0:20:01
Money, I trust it more like someone who, according to the editor's opinion,
|
|
|
0:20:01 – 0:20:10
The owner writes down his things. Just as a small train of thought.
|
|
|
0:20:10 – 0:20:23
So, then I noticed, lately, especially now that here too our
|
|
|
0:20:23 – 0:20:34
Friedrich Merz Ritzel, the new candidate for chancellor, who is most likely our chancellor
|
|
|
0:20:34 – 0:20:48
We have such an extreme fear and an eye on the left. That's evil. And this also has the
|
|
|
0:20:48 – 0:20:57
An acquaintance of mine. So for them, all that's left is somehow Antifa. I mean Antifa.
|
|
|
0:20:57 – 0:21:05
It's a compound word and that means anti-fascist. Anyone who opposes fascism
|
|
|
0:21:05 – 0:21:13
In the end, it's also Antifa. Now you can say yes, okay, then you're just a little bit
|
|
|
0:21:13 – 0:21:21
More left-wing. Most of them are anti-fascist or anti-fascist.
|
|
|
0:21:21 – 0:21:30
But anyone who opposes fascism can also be called an anti-fascist. But if I
|
|
|
0:21:30 – 0:21:40
see left-wing extremists everywhere and even if grandma are against right-wing extremists, then I have to
|
|
|
0:21:40 – 0:21:46
I wonder if everyone is on the left, am I not the only one on the right?
|
|
|
0:21:46 – 0:21:51
Because if everything is next to me on the left, then I'm the right.
|
|
|
0:21:51 – 0:21:54
You know what I mean? Do you understand what I mean?
|
|
|
0:21:54 – 0:22:05
I stopped discussing with people who consume alternative media because that makes no sense.
|
|
|
0:22:05 – 0:22:10
I am accused of being a system lemming.
|
|
|
0:22:10 – 0:22:14
Someone who is fooled,
|
|
|
0:22:14 – 0:22:19
and the others who consume alternative media, alternative press,
|
|
|
0:22:19 – 0:22:24
By the way, I mean alternative media, alternative journalism,
|
|
|
0:22:24 – 0:22:28
It's another word for me, like a lie.
|
|
|
0:22:28 – 0:22:33
It just sounds nicer when I call it alternative truth.
|
|
|
0:22:33 – 0:22:41
I always feel that people think they are the enlightened and they have recognized the truth as the only one.
|
|
|
0:22:41 – 0:22:43
It's like an Illuminati.
|
|
|
0:22:43 – 0:22:46
I'm privy to secrets, you're not.
|
|
|
0:22:46 – 0:22:51
Yeah, you're just a lemming and you're following the system press.
|
|
|
0:22:51 – 0:23:00
Yes, the funny thing is, if I now have someone who knows these strange wisdoms,
|
|
|
0:23:00 – 0:23:10
spread these illuminations, ask, can you provide me with evidence, can you then disclose this,
|
|
|
0:23:10 – 0:23:19
can you clearly disclose your research steps, that I can see how you
|
|
|
0:23:19 – 0:23:26
Your results have come. Either there's bullshit coming, or there's nothing coming. But I'll go
|
|
|
0:23:26 – 0:23:34
now to a journalist who works in the system press, in the lying press, then
|
|
|
0:23:34 – 0:23:45
I get a log where I can understand, point by point, how the research was done.
|
|
|
0:23:45 – 0:23:55
has been verified, like the documents, the findings, where there are gaps, where there are
|
|
|
0:23:55 – 0:24:04
You can and should do all the research to the point where the
|
|
|
0:24:04 – 0:24:12
The conclusion comes from this. I can fully understand. I get the alternatives
|
|
|
0:24:12 – 0:24:21
It's not! And that's the point. One is verifiable and the other is not. I mean,
|
|
|
0:24:21 – 0:24:31
I could also make a blog now and we call it "Biotope of Knowledge" and there
|
|
|
0:24:31 – 0:24:37
That's how I swore to myself all my brain-wearing clothes. And there will be
|
|
|
0:24:37 – 0:24:46
I'm just getting a Python script ready, which just bombards Chat-GBT with random stuff
|
|
|
0:24:46 – 0:24:53
and then it should generate news from it, i.e. stories in news style,
|
|
|
0:24:53 – 0:24:58
From which I can build my articles. These can be the most blatant things. So
|
|
|
0:24:58 – 0:25:06
Ilien are already among us, the earth is a disk and the earth is a doughnut,
|
|
|
0:25:06 – 0:25:17
such a Turus, i.e. the scientific name for a doughnut form. And we all don't live
|
|
|
0:25:17 – 0:25:25
see on the outside, but on the inside and through the distortion of the media
|
|
|
0:25:25 – 0:25:33
We don't want our world to be like this doughnut from within. Yeah, I could do it.
|
|
|
0:25:33 – 0:25:40
I'm sure from a million readers I may become one or two loyal followers.
|
|
|
0:25:40 – 0:25:52
But at least one believes it. I mean, I'm someone who's scientifically
|
|
|
0:25:52 – 0:26:03
has been trained. I went to school, I studied, I worked, I
|
|
|
0:26:03 – 0:26:12
I did an education, I studied and I had to do scientific research during the period.
|
|
|
0:26:12 – 0:26:21
work. I had to evaluate scientific results, I had to collect data, data
|
|
|
0:26:21 – 0:26:32
process and draw conclusions from it. And I'm someone who stands on facts and
|
|
|
0:26:32 – 0:26:40
It is not about alternative facts that allow a lot of room for interpretation.
|
|
|
0:26:40 – 0:26:54
And we now have in world history, in America, in Europe, people who are more likely to
|
|
|
0:26:54 – 0:27:06
Fictitious facts believe, as in verifiable facts. A Friedrich Merz demands that we
|
|
|
0:27:06 – 0:27:13
build at least two nuclear fusion reactors in Germany. Apart from that,
|
|
|
0:27:13 – 0:27:21
that we are at the very beginning of research, one could most likely, purely theoretically,
|
|
|
0:27:21 – 0:27:28
If all goes on like this, maybe in 50 years the first research reactors will be built,
|
|
|
0:27:28 – 0:27:37
They work halfway. I mean, we currently have runtimes of a few seconds,
|
|
|
0:27:37 – 0:27:46
where a plasma becomes so hot that the nuclei of atoms fuse. But that must be yes
|
|
|
0:27:46 – 0:27:52
be permanent, so that this thing produces more energy than we put into it, to stop the
|
|
|
0:27:52 – 0:28:00
Maintaining the process. Then it is said that we need nuclear power plants. Such a nuclear power plant
|
|
|
0:28:00 – 0:28:09
Building takes 20 years. Then Friedrich Merz is most likely already dead. And in
|
|
|
0:28:09 – 0:28:17
the period when he is in charge of saying that the government is leading, these are probably
|
|
|
0:28:17 – 0:28:27
For four years, nothing will happen. They're just there when they even started.
|
|
|
0:28:27 – 0:28:34
have to plan. So such a wind farm simply builds itself within two to three years with
|
|
|
0:28:34 – 0:28:41
Approval procedure and construction. And then such a thing really costs money compared to such
|
|
|
0:28:41 – 0:28:50
Wind farm. A wind farm, on the other hand, is a small thing. A nuclear power plant costs billions and none.
|
|
|
0:28:50 – 0:28:58
Energy company has more desire to build a nuclear power plant. Others in Europe are leaving, not because
|
|
|
0:28:58 – 0:29:06
The government wants this, but because the companies that run the nuclear power plants say it's worth it.
|
|
|
0:29:06 – 0:29:15
No more, other forms of energy are cheaper. Yes, then you sit there and marvel,
|
|
|
0:29:15 – 0:29:27
How about people who have studied and should work scientifically and
|
|
|
0:29:27 – 0:29:37
have understanding of it, so such may be incidental and half-truths or total
|
|
|
0:29:37 – 0:29:47
Spreading untruths without turning red, but others say they are windmills of terror.
|
|
|
0:29:47 – 0:29:55
I can really imagine how a woman Weidel sits there, like Don Kirchhott and against
|
|
|
0:29:55 – 0:30:04
the windmills fight, she comes running and then stops trying with a briefcase,
|
|
|
0:30:04 – 0:30:14
To knock over such a wind turbine. Because it is a windmill of terror. The entire chain of reasoning,
|
|
|
0:30:14 – 0:30:25
That renewable energy is as much more expensive than nuclear energy is so wrong. And you can see it
|
|
|
0:30:25 – 0:30:34
from data that is there. So production and if you take into account the construction and the dismantling,
|
|
|
0:30:34 – 0:30:43
Nuclear power is so far away from good and evil. Above all, this storage situation,
|
|
|
0:30:43 – 0:30:50
what happens to nuclear waste and high-level radioactive waste during the dismantling of a nuclear reactor.
|
|
|
0:30:50 – 0:30:57
We don't have any reasonable solutions for that either. And all these things become
|
|
|
0:30:57 – 0:31:05
not mentioned and the cost of it and we are talking about a radiant waste for millions of
|
|
|
0:31:05 – 0:31:15
years. I mean, people hear, yes, so Uranium 236 has a half-life of bla bla bla bla. The
|
|
|
0:31:15 – 0:31:22
People don't know what a half-life is. If I have a kilo of brailleoctive material
|
|
|
0:31:22 – 0:31:29
and this has a half-life of ten years, then after ten years half of it is gone
|
|
|
0:31:29 – 0:31:34
And after another ten years, half of it is gone.
|
|
|
0:31:34 – 0:31:38
And after another ten years, half of it is gone.
|
|
|
0:31:38 – 0:31:42
We've been there for 30 years and I still have an eighth.
|
|
|
0:31:42 – 0:31:48
One eighth, if I'm not mistaken, is 125 grams.
|
|
|
0:31:48 – 0:31:53
Yes, you can argue about it now.
|
|
|
0:31:53 – 0:32:01
And I mean, there are substances and compounds that have much longer half-lives
|
|
|
0:32:01 – 0:32:09
Like 10 years. So some have 100,000, some even more, some only 1000. But
|
|
|
0:32:09 – 0:32:17
In the multitudes that arise there are eternity, as the stuff is in the rays, and
|
|
|
0:32:17 – 0:32:24
It is so radiant that it is deadly. I mean, burned-out fuel that's in a
|
|
|
0:32:24 – 0:32:31
Castor containers must be packed in, actively cooled for a longer period of time,
|
|
|
0:32:31 – 0:32:39
because the fuel elements, which have burned out, are still so hot and so active with their
|
|
|
0:32:39 – 0:32:46
Splitting processes that would otherwise get problems within this castor container.
|
|
|
0:32:46 – 0:32:55
Nobody talks about it, but that's the way it is. That's physics, folks. This is very simple,
|
|
|
0:32:55 – 0:33:02
Simple physics. Sure, I'm also thinking about my future. And, Lord God,
|
|
|
0:33:02 – 0:33:08
Who will pay for all this? Spice cucumbers, vinegar cucumbers are the only product.
|
|
|
0:33:08 – 0:33:17
So, now we've deduced a whole bunch of topics that I've been dealing with since then.
|
|
|
0:33:17 – 0:33:27
keep busy for some time and when I open TikTok or YouTube and then stop
|
|
|
0:33:27 – 0:33:45
Then I watch the news or the videos of opinion YouTubers, then I'm really scared
|
|
|
0:33:45 – 0:33:55
for my future. Not because I'm not going to live a good life, but that all this,
|
|
|
0:33:55 – 0:34:05
What I've known so far is gone, will collapse. I can still remember,
|
|
|
0:34:05 – 0:34:14
the mood at the end of the 90s, when the Cold War was over and the wall had also fallen and
|
|
|
0:34:14 – 0:34:24
The Eastern bloc has disintegrated in such a way that we are now on the right track in the world. This has
|
|
|
0:34:24 – 0:34:31
I've said it a few times in different formats, but somehow we didn't get out of it.
|
|
|
0:34:31 – 0:34:37
history learned from the past, but we are somehow at one point,
|
|
|
0:34:37 – 0:34:45
Where everything is back on track. And now we come back to the situation on
|
|
|
0:34:45 – 0:34:52
It's the beginning. I'm really wondering if we're not going to have the beginnings of a
|
|
|
0:34:52 – 0:35:01
The Third World War. On the one hand, you have America, which has been for many decades.
|
|
|
0:35:01 – 0:35:18
long been allies of large parts of the world. Europe, parts of Asia, Australia and
|
|
|
0:35:18 – 0:35:29
On the other hand, you had Russia, next to China and a few other countries and there
|
|
|
0:35:29 – 0:35:38
The rules of the game were very clear. And now you have completely new rules of the game. On
|
|
|
0:35:38 – 0:35:48
on the one hand America, on the other hand Russia and then China, maybe then
|
|
|
0:35:48 – 0:35:57
South America and Africa and these are completely new borders and you share the
|
|
|
0:35:57 – 0:36:10
The world is resurrected. And I'm really scared that we're totally in the back...
|
|
|
0:36:10 – 0:36:19
Losing the connection. These are the fears and fears I have now.
|
|
|
0:36:19 – 0:36:27
I have. I hope you can understand this a little bit and I have something again
|
|
|
0:36:27 – 0:36:32
But not so much, because somehow I was on the subject. me
|
|
|
0:36:32 – 0:36:38
I had to keep catching up in places. We have time for a real digression.
|
|
|
0:36:38 – 0:36:44
I think we'll do one where we start at A, then go over Z and go back again.
|
|
|
0:36:44 – 0:36:55
B. What do you think? By the way, if you have heard the pickles, you can
|
|
|
0:36:55 – 0:37:06
Leave a comment there. It's a matter of my fiancée's heart. For whatever reason. Goodbye, Mr. Sasha.
|
|
|
0:37:06 – 0:37:22
[Music]
|
Description:
Some events feel like a bad dream – but what if they are real? In this episode, we dive into political abysses, social turning points, and economic inconsistencies that seem so surreal that one might think reality has fever.
From elections and world politics to alternative truths and the big question: Are we on track to learn from our mistakes – or are we just repeating them in new packaging?
A journey through thoughts, digressions and the unvarnished analysis of our time. With a pinch of sarcasm, a dose of critical gaze and the infamous pickle question.
Listen in now – but be careful: This episode could shake your worldview.
If you say a number every second, you can easily calculate how long it will take you for 1,000,000,000 (one billion) seconds:
1,000,000,000 seconds = 1,000,000,000 ÷ 60 = 16,666,667 minutes
16,666,667 minutes = 16,666,667 ÷ 60 = 277,778 hours
277,778 hours = 277,778 ÷ 24 = 11,574 days
11,574 days = 11,574 ÷ 365 ≈ 31.7 years
So it would take you about 31.7 years – provided you count continuously, without sleep, food or breaks.
With realistic breaks (sleep, food, etc.), you'd be more likely to need 40-50 years. 😅
The full-length scandal between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy
Change of Government: Is nuclear power coming back?
Hartz IV: Who really benefits from this? | ZDF Magazine Royale
Wealth committed? The responsibility of the super-rich - MONITOR
Topics Outline:
1 ️⃣ Intro & Personal update
- greeting
- Sorry for the fancy episode.
- History of the disease & thoughts on visiting a doctor
2 ️⃣ Political fever dream
- 20 % for the AfD – what does that mean?
- CDU and Friedrich Merz as candidates for chancellor
- Parallels to political developments in the United States
3 ️⃣ Donald Trump, Zelensky & the political climate
- Trump's dealings with Zelenskyy
- Perpetrator-victim reversal & gaslighting in politics
- New global shifts in power
4 ️⃣ Hartz IV, Anxiety culture & Economy
- Review of the introduction of the Hartz laws
- Impact on wages and the labour market
- The Role of Fear in Economic Policy
5 ️⃣ Billionaires, Taxes & Social Responsibility
- Why rich people don't have to pay taxes
- Lack of social responsibility despite wealth
- A vivid explanation of millions vs. billions
6 ️⃣ Europe, America and the New World Order
- Why Europe needs to be more united
- How geopolitical conditions are shifting
- Is a European Union still up-to-date?
7 ️⃣ Alternative Media vs. System Press
- The Debate About Fake News & Truth Claims
- Why alternative media are often unproven
- Journalism between independence & interests
8 ️⃣ Merz, nuclear power & the energy debate
- Unrealistic demands for nuclear fusion
- The Truth About Nuclear Power vs. Renewable Energy
- Misconceptions about radiation & half-lives
9 ️⃣ Fears of the future & the impending world conflict
- New geopolitical tensions
- Are we on the road to a third world war?
- Comparison to the mood of the 1990s
🔟 Outro & Thoughts on Closing
- Conclusion of the episode
- The pickle insider 😉
- adoption
Links to the issue:
-
The full-length scandal between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy
-
Change of Government: Is nuclear power coming back?
-
Hartz IV: Who really benefits from this? | ZDF Magazine Royale
-
Wealth committed? The responsibility of the super-rich - MONITOR
Advertising:
Contributors to this episode
Sascha
Playing time: 0:37:22
Date of admission: 01.03.25
This episode is from season 4, there are a total of 4 seasons.
One According to Funk Publication Cartel Production - Where stories are transmitted unmistakably.
Podcast license:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Note: This post contains affiliate links. If you shop through these links, I'll get a small commission at no extra cost to you.
English